• About
  • Masthead
    • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News
    • No image
      Performance at Punch’s Alley prompts confusion, safety concerns
    • No image
      UniLAd plans to support the local teacher union
    • No image
      Survey results reveal need for mental health support at colleges
    • News in Brief
    • Senate Report
  • Features
    • EnAct and YDSA hold crochet-in for climate action
      EnAct and YDSA hold crochet-in for climate action
    • Professor Cindy Ok Awarded Yale Younger Poets Prize
      Professor Cindy Ok Awarded Yale Younger Poets Prize
    • Trans non-binary runner talks about activism in running
      Trans non-binary runner talks about activism in running
    • Alumnae Spotlight
    • Faculty Focus
  • Opinions
    • It’s hard to not love ChatGPT
      It’s hard to not love ChatGPT
    • Under the “friendly” and “earthy” facade, Trader Joe’s hides unethical practices
      Under the “friendly” and “earthy” facade, Trader Joe’s hides unethical practices
    • Job insecurity for student workers has complex consequences
      Job insecurity for student workers has complex consequences
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
  • Arts
    • Rio Romeo releases single “Over & Over”
      Rio Romeo releases single “Over & Over”
    • Dolly Parton confirms “Rock Star” collaborations
      Dolly Parton confirms “Rock Star” collaborations
    • MFA opens visiting exhibit “Hokusai: Inspiration and Influence”
      MFA opens visiting exhibit “Hokusai: Inspiration and Influence”
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • No image
      What even is a BORG and why does it matter?
    • Indoor Track & Field Team Prepares for Outdoors
      Indoor Track & Field Team Prepares for Outdoors
    • What even are BORGs and why do they matter?
      What even are BORGs and why do they matter?
    • Athlete of the Month
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top ten times feminism led us astray
      Top ten times feminism led us astray
    • Song Victims
      Song Victims
    • How to: Prep your Preschooler for the College Application Process
      How to: Prep your Preschooler for the College Application Process
By Andrea Jackson OpinionsOctober 1, 2014

GOP bill ignores cost of birth control

Republican senator Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire and a slew of other Republican senators introduced the “Preserving Religious Freedom and a Woman’s Access to Contraception Act” to the Committee on Finance this past July. The new legislation proposed by Ayotte would allow women to buy birth control pills over the counter without a prescription. The Republican senator’s legislation is problematic because insurance companies are not obligated to pay for over-the-counter drugs. Unless the Republican bill to legitimize prescription-free contraception is paired with a bill that forces insurance companies to cover over-the-counter medications, women’s accessibility to contraceptives will be stifled.

The biggest let down about the Republican legislative proposal is that it will only urge the FDA to study over-the-counter sales. It is not an effective policy that will be implemented immediately. Instead, if passed, it will take years for the FDA to run scientific evaluations of oral contraceptives’ safety and efficiency and before allowing contraceptives to be sold over-the-counter.

Opposers of the legislation argue that it is merely a reaction to Democratic claims of the GOP’s “War on Women” and is just a tactic to entice women voters. The proposal is an unexpected move by the Republican Party because of the GOP’s tendency to reject similar legislation.

As previously noted, the idea of offering birth control pills over-the-counter is not a new idea. It is a simple and obvious idea, and many developing countries have allowed the sale of over-the-counter birth control pills. The result of over-the-counter birth control pills in these countries is one anyone would expect: lower rates of undesired pregnancies and higher accessibility to contraceptives.

Adversaries of the proposal argue that allowing birth control pills to be purchased without a prescription will actually raise the cost of contraceptives for women, specifically uninsured lower-class women.

According to Paul Waldman, a writer for the Washington Post, uninsured women would pay $600 a year for over-the-counter birth control pills. Interestingly, the Obamacare plan would not cover the cost of over-the-counter medications, which do not qualify for Obamacare’s zero-out-of-pocket policy.

The affordability of birth control pills is a huge obstacle that many lower and middle-class women face. While there may be other obstacles such as which pill to take or how women will get advice from their doctor, none are as stifling as the price tag attached to a woman’s health care. Once this obstacle is defeated, then perhaps all the other details can be addressed.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleMillennials gain from postponing adulthood
Next articleRepublicans must include more women in party base

You may also like

Cat GPT logo

It’s hard to not love ChatGPT

Fruit and vegetable section

Under the “friendly” and “earthy” facade, Trader Joe’s hides unethical practices

Wellesley college students at a career fair

Job insecurity for student workers has complex consequences

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top