• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
      Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
    • Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age
      Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age
    • Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation
      Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Controversial
      The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Controversial
    • Lucy Dacus Brings a Minimal Yet Powerful Performance to Northeastern University
      Lucy Dacus Brings a Minimal Yet Powerful Performance to Northeastern University
    • “Glass Onion” Takes Shots at Easy Targets
      “Glass Onion” Takes Shots at Easy Targets
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Happy Valentine’s Day from Spog
      Happy Valentine’s Day from Spog
    • The Four Best Places to Loudly FaceTime Someone on Campus
      The Four Best Places to Loudly FaceTime Someone on Campus
    • PJ’s Letter to Santa
      PJ’s Letter to Santa
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Nikita Nagras Arts, ReviewsFebruary 17, 2016

“Pride and Prejudice and Zombies” struggles to channel tasteful absurdity

Actress Lily James as Elizabeth Bennett.

This year’s Valentine rom-com mashes monsters with muslin: “Pride and Prejudice and Zombies” is a two-hour saga set in zombie-torn Regency England. The cheerful English countryside swarms with the walking corpses of England’s noblest ancestors. No longer does Elizabeth Bennet sit daintily in a tea parlour and wait for a rich gentleman to whisk her away; instead, she hides daggers and muskets underneath flowing skirts and takes a break from her afternoon tea to slay every “unmentionable” in sight. A feisty heroine, a classic romance and the walking dead: a lethal formula, with disappointing results. The film is not popular amongst Austen fans and literary critics and for good reason. By necessity, reimaginings of films or literature alter characters beyond perception. They add lengthy backgrounds, justify unsavory characteristics, redeem villains and shade in gray areas. Pride and Prejudice and Zombies does none of these. Seth Grahame-Smith’s novel of the same name was a parody of Pride and Prejudice, a creative, if rather ineffectual, experimentation of a beloved classic. The film tries to cast Grahame-Smith’s comical concept in a serious light and consequently reduces Austen’s complex characters to irritating caricatures of themselves. Nonetheless, the movie as a standalone remains an enjoyable romp through apocalyptic England, and although not a retelling worthy of Austen, serves as another creative experiment to satisfy the many morbid fantasies of Austen fans.      

The film retains the most basic elements of the classic zombie movie, splattered with skeletons and exploding eyeballs. Darcy and Elizabeth hurl witticisms and bullets, Jane Bennet arrives at Netherfield drenched in rain and zombie guts, Wickham almost charms Elizabeth into creating an army of the undead, and Mr. Collins aims a gun at a zombie only to shoot Catherine de Bourgh in the face (well, at least we wish he had.) Placing Austen’s most beloved characters amidst zombies provokes understandably absurd reactions from the characters and even explains the motives behind the characters’ actions. Mrs. Bennet’s frantic plotting to get her daughters married before they become zombie fodder elicits sympathy from the audience, and conversely, Mr. Bennet’s neglect in instilling more propriety and sophistication in his daughters makes perfect sense in the apocalyptic context. After all, when a zombie can disrupt a ball and consume half the guests within five minutes, the arts of war should take precedence over the arts of seduction. Charlotte Lucas, possessing no combat skills, must marry Mr. Collins and receive the protection of Lady Catherine de Bourgh if she wishes to survive. Faced with a prospect of an early and gruesome death, even the minor characters have edges and a sharpness of personality lacking in Austen’s sleepy English countryside. They are darker and more digestible, and perhaps even more three-dimensional; sycophantic fawning turns into pleas for protection and betrayals into self-preservation.

   The film places Jane Austen’s most beloved characters in absurd situations and provokes even more absurd reactions from the characters. For instance, when Mr. Darcy makes his infamous proposal, Lizzie fiercely attacks him–not just verbally but with her well-trained fists and feet. A sexually-charged combat between the two lovers ensues, as Austenites swoon over the scandalous breach of Regency protocol and Mr. Darcy’s taut biceps.

Photo courtesy of Screen Gems

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleIn “Hail, Caesar!” kidnapping steals the plot… again.
Next article“Women in Games and Play” panel discusses video games as art and culture

You may also like

The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Controversial

image of lucy dacus playing the guitar in multicolored lights.

Lucy Dacus Brings a Minimal Yet Powerful Performance to Northeastern University

“Glass Onion” Takes Shots at Easy Targets

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

  • Logos of social media apps such as Twitter, Tiktok, Netflix, Spotify, and Discord. Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
  • Stone-Davis dining staff report mistreatment
  • A collection of a wide variety of foods in the colors of the rainbow Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflat...
  • The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Contro...
  • Red envelope that contains money to celebrate the Lunar New Year. America’s cultural appropriation is a modern form of i...

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top