• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Students Remember the Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsberg
      Students Remember the Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsberg
    • First-Year Students Reflect on Their Expectations for College, One Semester In
      First-Year Students Reflect on Their Expectations for College, One Semester In
    • “We Want to Fundamentally Change the Culture,” International Student Union says
      “We Want to Fundamentally Change the Culture,” International Student Union says
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • The block system is a joke
      The block system is a joke
    • Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
      Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • Harry Styles de-typifies masculinity in Vogue’s December Issue, but is this enough? (spoiler: it’s not)
      Harry Styles de-typifies masculinity in Vogue’s December Issue, but is this enough? (spoiler: it’s not)
    • Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
      Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
    • Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
      Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • No image
      Maintaining wellness as the cold sets in
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Alexandria Otero OpinionsMarch 16, 2016

Bloomberg: the greater unity triumphs any presidential aspirations

Photo courtesy of Esquire

This past week, Michael Bloomberg, former Mayor of New York City, wrote a piece in The Bloomberg View stating that he would not be running for President as an independent because he feared that his candidacy would make a Donald Trump or Ted Cruz victory more likely. This election cycle, it seems likely that either front runner Trump or runner-up Cruz will be the Republican nominee in the general election. If he were to run as an independent in the general election, Bloomberg would only be appealing to moderate and right leaning democrats, leaving the angry far right and left untouched and making it easier for Trump or Cruz to get elected. The question that everyone seems to be asking is whether he made the right decision in not running. Would it have really made a difference? If anything, it would have just made the political climate even more divided.

This election cycle, candidates on both sides of the political spectrum have rightfully called out flaws in our political system. These critiques need to be said, and the conversation must be had. However, the angry voices on both the right and left are not open to compromise, as Bloomberg has noticed. If he were to run, there would not be any drastic change in the political system. It would just pull some swing voters away from a democrat like Hillary Clinton if she were to win the nomination.

 The right is going to stay put with Trump or Cruz. This could lead to the possibility of Congress picking the candidate in the event that neither would have enough electoral delegates. If this were to happen, Bloomberg would definitely not be elected, and neither would Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders. Most likely, the Republican House would pick the Republican nominee. As Bloomberg states, “That is a risk I cannot take in good conscience.

Bloomberg’s decision seems to be the correct one in this instance because his run would only further divide voters. It has become evident that there are ideological divisions in both parties. Most notably, the Republican party has been experiencing a seemingly irreconcilable schism between far right Tea Partiers and moderate voters. The Democrats are experiencing a generational divide between Clinton and Sanders supporters, which seems to be growing as the primary season continues. Bloomberg would not fit into any of these categories, and his campaign would likely be ineffectual.

Instead of running for President, Bloomberg decided to use his platform in politics to point out the flaws of the Republican front-runners’ positions. He spends a majority of his written piece condemning Trump and Cruz for their harsh anti-immigration policies, bigotry and racism.

He urges the public to make an informed decision about their candidate by “urging all voters to reject divisive appeals and demanding that candidates offer intelligent, specific, and realistic ideas for bridging divides solving problems, and giving us the honest capable government we deserve.”

Bloomberg, like many others in public life, does not think that running for President at this time is going to drastically change the general election for the better. For example, former candidate Mitt Romney was also asked about a potential bid, and he explicitly stated he would not be running.

Like Bloomberg, he has been very vocal in denouncing the Republican front runners. On the other side of the aisle, personalities such as John Oliver are also making appeals to the public to not vote for the Republican front- runners. Although we are not united in policy, a majority of leaders agree we cannot let President Trump or Cruz become a reality.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleProfessors cannot fully participate in student activism
Next articleDiversify the bestsellers’ list: Literature by minority authors should not be ignored

You may also like

A piece of pizza missing topings.

Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?

The block system is a joke

Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

  • Harry Styles de-typifies masculinity in Vogue’s December Iss...
  • First-Year Students Reflect on Their Expectations for Colleg...
  • Students Remember the Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsberg

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top