• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
      Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
    • Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age
      Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age
    • Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation
      Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Controversial
      The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Controversial
    • Lucy Dacus Brings a Minimal Yet Powerful Performance to Northeastern University
      Lucy Dacus Brings a Minimal Yet Powerful Performance to Northeastern University
    • “Glass Onion” Takes Shots at Easy Targets
      “Glass Onion” Takes Shots at Easy Targets
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Rejected Snooze Articles for the Week
      Rejected Snooze Articles for the Week
    • Happy Valentine’s Day from Spog
      Happy Valentine’s Day from Spog
    • The Four Best Places to Loudly FaceTime Someone on Campus
      The Four Best Places to Loudly FaceTime Someone on Campus
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By The Wellesley News Staff Opinions, Staff EditorialApril 7, 2016

Do not choose to abstain: Vote in College Government elections

Photo courtesy of Wellesley College

Tomorrow, the Wellesley community will elect its 2016-2017 College Government Cabinet. While the ballot lists both registered candidates and reserves a space for write-ins, it will also present the option to abstain. Abstain effectively counts as a no vote against both candidates, and if enough people choose that option, the election must be run again. While a Wellesley student may choose this alternative due to their disappointment with the candidates, that is no excuse at all to abstain by checking it off on the ballot or not voting at all, seniors included.

There are several reasons why a student may choose to abstain. Students may be faithless electors, who would rather toss a vote of no confidence than one of confidence. However, the elections are well-publicized and open. If a student has no faith in the current contenders, they cannot realistically expect for another student to step up to the plate. Rather, Wellesley has the write-in candidate option for this very reason, rendering the abstain option ineffective. Surely, if a student is disappointed in the candidates, that student must know of a peer better suited to fill the position.

The student could also choose to abstain because they see themselves as ignorant about most issues or poorly informed about the candidate’s experience and platform. Given the amount of open debates, office hours and candidate crawls, there are numerous ways to be educated about college government contenders. All competitors actively spam, reach out and provide many detailed online platforms that list their ideas, hopes and dreams for Wellesley. To be ignorant is to actively ignore opportunities to learn about contenders. As political philosophers like Jason Brennan argue, voters have a moral duty to be well-informed about the candidates for which they vote. The elected cabinet will make decisions that will affect all aspects of the college. Voting also demands responsibility. By no means, should a student forgo their responsibility. Rather, students should elect candidates who are capable but also willing to improve campus life. Seniors also have an obligation to vote. While the Class of 2016 is graduating this year, this cohort of students perhaps understands Wellesley and College Government the best. Seniors should responsibly exercise their right to vote and help ensure that the succeeding legacy is competent. College Government has a substantial influence on campus.

The argument to abstain is more sensible in significantly larger democracies, convoluted by the politics of the matter. Wellesley is, however, home to only about 2,344 students. Unlike in the wider U.S. elections, the argument that a large number of voters eliminates the significance of any single student does not hold. Every vote counts at Wellesley. More so, the College Government cabinet exercises a great deal of power over the Wellesley student body. Voting for experienced, reliable candidates is crucial to a successful, practical and directed year. A strong College government will also bolster increased and active participation by the Class of 2020. Tomorrow, the Wellesley community will elect a cabinet. For a college community that prides itself on ensuring agency and a voice to all students, we, the Wellesley News Staff, hope that this same community will actively educate itself on the candidates and vote wholeheartedly.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleGoing Red: Life as a Republican at Wellesley
Next articleA case of political incorrectness: Opinions section unfairly coerce students into having opinions

You may also like

Logos of social media apps such as Twitter, Tiktok, Netflix, Spotify, and Discord.

Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity

Abstract painting of various boxes meant to imply computer and phone screens

Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age

A collection of a wide variety of foods in the colors of the rainbow

Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

  • Stone-Davis dining staff report mistreatment
  • Logos of social media apps such as Twitter, Tiktok, Netflix, Spotify, and Discord. Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
  • The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Contro...
  • A collection of a wide variety of foods in the colors of the rainbow Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflat...
  • Red envelope that contains money to celebrate the Lunar New Year. America’s cultural appropriation is a modern form of i...

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top