• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
      Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
    • It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
      It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
    • What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
      What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • No image
      Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy
    • No image
      Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand
    • Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
      Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
      Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
    • Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
      Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
    • The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
      The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By The Wellesley News Staff Opinions, Staff EditorialApril 29, 2016

Multicultural requirement fails as a diversity education measure

Photo courtesy of Wellesley College.

As part of distribution requirements, students are required to take a single unit of coursework that demonstrates awareness of a non-Western culture or of social dynamics involving minority groups within a Western culture. Although Wellesley College attempts to demonstrate a commitment to multiculturalism, this requirement seems like pure lip service to diversity education.

In fact, the general tone on campus centers on bending the rules in order to fulfill this requirement rather than actually taking the class. It is no mystery that fulfilling the distribution requirements in addition to a major is difficult. Moreover, it seems nearly impossible to both graduate on time and take a few “fun” classes for which liberal arts schools are famous. However, despite that, multiculturalism should be a more significant, rigorous obligation in our Wellesley education.

The implication of the requirement is that students’ worldviews and opinions change as a result of this class. In our increasingly diverse global climate, this seems like an important stipulation that should be advocated for and protected by the school. A common criticism of Wellesley is the inherent focus on “white feminism,” suggesting that the philosophy the college advocates is not intersectional. For instance, the institution will be content as long as it is churning out women who will eventually be bankers, lawyers, doctors, C.E.O’s and occupants of otherwise traditionally high-earning jobs. There is inadequate emphasis on jobs in equally valuable sectors, like social service or justice. Having merely a single unit dedicated to multiculturalism and diversity seems consistent with this reputation. There is an indication that because a credit on multiculturalism doesn’t look impressive to Goldman Sachs or Harvard Law School, it doesn’t have merit. From a liberal arts school whose objective is to give students an overall education on a variety of topics, including cultures of the entire world, this viewpoint is unacceptable.

In addition, this requirement seems to simply be a token for the school. Does Wellesley truly believe that one class alone is enough to further a student’s multicultural knowledge? Given that this class is seen by the community as a throwaway, and that the bounds of the requirement are vague at best, the college needs to improve and emphasize its commitment to pluralism. Wellesley should dedicate itself to the diversity of the world and its own student body. International students and students of color have long seen the history of their people as irrelevant. The history of women, people of color and LGBTQIA+ students are often separate panels in textbooks, a separate and comparatively unimportant topic. Our single unit of multiculturalism is doing the same thing. It is a negligible course to appease the student body, but is separate from the overall requirements of a serious liberal arts curriculum. As a community, we must evolve our distribution requirements to better fit the needs of our students. That is, we must expand the provision to be more than just a single unit of vague multiculturalism. Rather, we must encourage departmental majors to ensure that they are offering courses that too promote diversity.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleAnti-Zionism should not be conflated with anti-Semitism
Next articleNew waitlist system guarantees a streamlined course registration

You may also like

Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification

It’s time to put traditional grading to the test

Banner reading this website has been seized over images of a book shelf

What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top