• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Welcoming Wellesley’s Green Class of 2025
      Welcoming Wellesley’s Green Class of 2025
    • 2020 Alumnae Achievement Awards Held Virtually; 3 Awardees Honored
      2020 Alumnae Achievement Awards Held Virtually; 3 Awardees Honored
    • Students Remember the Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsberg
      Students Remember the Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsberg
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • No image
      You have no valid reasons to oppose raising the minimum wage
    • No image
      Free the pee: cut the hygiene theater and let us use other bathrooms
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • “Judas and the Black Messiah” subverts, soars as Civil Rights story
      “Judas and the Black Messiah” subverts, soars as Civil Rights story
    • Black Entertainment Without Black Trauma: Recommendations for BHM!
      Black Entertainment Without Black Trauma: Recommendations for BHM!
    • Queer Storylines in “The Prom” Fall Flat
      Queer Storylines in “The Prom” Fall Flat
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • COVID-19: Popping the Wellesley Bubble
      COVID-19: Popping the Wellesley Bubble
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By thewellesleynews Opinions, Staff EditorialSeptember 21, 2016

As Wellesley propels itself in rank, women’s colleges underperform

Graphic by Jee Lee '19, Digital Editor

In its annually published ranking of national liberal arts colleges, U.S. News and World Report awarded Wellesley an unprecedented third place. The institution scored 94 out of a possible 100 points for its “undergraduate reputation, faculty resources, student selectivity” and more.

While this list may be a source of great pride for us, it signifies the dismal truth about the treatment of women’s colleges in America. The system used by USNWR to quantify universities is inherently biased towards co-educational institutions. In fact, Wellesley was the only single-gender institution within in the top ten, the next highest being Smith College in twelfth place.

This has been the case for many years now as women’s colleges have struggled to place within the top five. In 2010, Wellesley managed to achieve fourth place, which, at the time, was the highest position achieved by any women’s college. Aggregated data from Washington Post shows that Wellesley is an anomaly compared to other single-sex institutions. In fact, Smith, Scripps and Bryn Mawr have hovered around the low to mid twenties, while Barnard and Mt. Holyoke have ranked around thirtieth and fortieth.

In reality, the criteria used to determine such rankings are biased against women’s colleges due to factors such as the wage gap, workplace discrimination and acceptance rates.

Because Wellesley only accepts students who actively identify as women, our applicant pool is severely limited compared to those of otherwise similar institutions. For instance, according to its student newspaper, Amherst received 8,397 applications, while Wellesley obtained roughly half of that number: 4,888. However, both offered about 1,200 candidates admission to the class of 2020, making the former’s acceptance rate much lower. When factored into USNWR’s ranking system, Amherst appears to be twice as selective as Wellesley, when, in reality, it had the benefit of a larger applicant pool.

Furthermore, colleges are ranked based on their undergraduate academic reputation, which is judged by leading academics and public high school counselors. Therefore, this arbitrary assessment may not be an accurate reflection of “academic excellence”.

Finally, women’s colleges, though known for powerful alumnae connections, often rank lower than co-educational institutions in alumnae giving rates, according to statistics from The Wall Street Journal’s article, “A Bigger Piece of the Alumni Pie.” This trend is, in large part, due to the wage gap. As The New York Times noted in 2015, colleges “are good at tracking down rich alumni to hit up for donations, but people who make little or no money are harder and less lucrative to find.” Most women earn roughly 77 cents to the male dollar, and for single-sex colleges, entire generations of graduates are being shortchanged with regards to their earnings. In combination with student debt, how can we expect alumnae to donate to their alma maters? Although Wellesley is a significant exception to this feature, it is no surprise that most women’s colleges suffer from a lack of donations.

Regardless, the value of an education from Wellesley lies not in its high rank, but rather in its single-sex student body. As U.S. News and World reported in a 2013 article, “classrooms of only (or mainly) women students result in those students participating more actively in the classroom, and reporting higher levels of active learning, higher order thinking and more academic challenge throughout their four years than women in coed settings report.” The intangible qualities of a Wellesley degree are its distinguishing characteristics. The empowerment and confidence we gain simply from being in this unique setting cannot be quantified by the rankings produced by USNWR, nor can our experience be captured by a number. Rather, the environment provides us with leadership qualities that take us far in both our personal and professional careers.

A number does not represent the experiences that we share here, nor the wisdom that is imparted to us by our faculty and staff. It is not a measure of the diverse values we bring, nor the opinions we develop during our time on this campus. Wellesley is a conglomeration of diverse thoughts and backgrounds; the moments we share and discussions we partake in are the features that define this institution for us.

Certainly, it is these intangible values of growth and community that identify Wellesley’s importance. Though we view rankings as a form of validation, we must consider them secondary to our adventures and academic pursuits. Our time here is for personal discovery, to follow our passions and forge new ones.

Measures of an excellent school are often arbitrary and hardly capture the full experience. Colleges should not cater to rankings. When applying, high school students should depend on comprehensive profiles instead that are more investigative of the college experience, from classroom to personality.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleTrigger warnings promote engagement and respect diversity
Next articleMedia proceeds in necessary but sexist investigations of Presidential candidates’ health

You may also like

You have no valid reasons to oppose raising the minimum wage

Free the pee: cut the hygiene theater and let us use other bathrooms

A piece of pizza missing topings.

Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

  • Free the pee: cut the hygiene theater and let us use other b...
  • COVID-19: Popping the Wellesley Bubble
  • Queer Storylines in “The Prom” Fall Flat
  • Black Entertainment Without Black Trauma: Recommendations fo...
  • You have no valid reasons to oppose raising the minimum wage

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top