• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
      Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
    • It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
      It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
    • What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
      What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • No image
      Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy
    • No image
      Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand
    • Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
      Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
      Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
    • Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
      Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
    • The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
      The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Jodi Wei ArtsOctober 26, 2016

Dear People of the Internet: Stop defending everything that is offensive

Tuesday of last week, New Yorkers in lower Manhattan were shocked as a nearly-naked, cloven-hoofed Hillary Clinton appeared in the streets. Perched atop a map with a blood-covered pinpoint on Benghazi strewn with political cartoons and deleted emails, the Democratic presidential nominee’s likeness was garishly depicted with an open blouse, accompanied by an exaggerated Wall Street banker puckering his lips in apparent preparation to breastfeed from Clinton. The statue caused an uproar as a Clinton supporter, known only as “Nancy,” knocked over and broke parts of the statue while alleged artist 27-year-old Anthony Scioli—suspiciously absent in any Internet searches despite contemporary art’s heavy reliance on viral publicity—fought desperately to save it. Eventually, police asked Scioli to remove the statue because of his lack of permit.

The Clinton statue comes months after anarchist collective Indecline’s coordinated effort to erect naked Donald Trump statues in Seattle, San Francisco, Cleveland, Los Angeles and New York. In August, the group’s NYC Trump statue, depicted sans testicles and cheekily named “The Emperor Has No Balls,” received an entirely different reaction—bystanders took selfies, crowds gathered and jeered, the New York City Parks Department even tweeted, “NYC Parks stands firmly against any unpermitted erection in city parks, no matter how small.”

As with anything tied to this hellish election cycle, opinion writers jumped at the chance to give their two-cents on the distinct disparity of reactions. Linda Stasi of the “New York Daily News” defended the Hillary statue as “protest art—no matter if you find it obscene or ugly or not” and that knocking over the statue was “an attempt on Nan part to stop freedom of expression.” Meanwhile, Carin Kuoni, a professor of contemporary art and political engagement at The New School told the Associated Press, “The history of how the female body appears has clearly been so negatively coded and inscribed that it makes for a completely different intervention when you see the sculpture of a naked woman than when you see a naked man.”

I’m more inclined to agree with Kuoni on this issue. Not all statues are created equal, and the rancor and misogyny embedded in the Clinton statue warranted the type of reaction it received. It is one thing for an artist to poke fun at the size of a man’s genitalia, especially when the subject of ridicule has publicly made statements defending the size of his penis in his pursuit for the presidency of the United States, but another thing entirely when the artist goes so far as to define the subject by her mistakes and liken her to Satan. Not only that, but the statue of Clinton is shown breastfeeding a Wall Street banker. Talk of male genitalia has more or less been normalized, but in a time when breastfeeding in public is still a touchy subject, this provocative imagery is surely meant to denounce a female bodily function, which is inherently sexist, and points to the bigger issue some may have with a female presidential nominee.

Not every politically-charged street artist can be Banksy, and the artist of the Hillary statue proves this by focusing not on the far-reaching issues of society, but by reiterating the tired defamation of Clinton. So often on the lips of conservative opponents, the phrases “deleted emails” and “Benghazi” no longer have that scandalous shine. The statue is nothing but a tasteless attempt at a political cartoon come to life, and yet people still choose to defend it.

Scioli, or whomever the statue can be attributed to, attempted protest art and his efforts backfired incredibly, but he did spark a conversation about obscenity and free speech. It’s not a matter of thin-skinned liberals taking offense to anything and all; the statue represents exactly what has gone wrong in this election cycle: a focus on name-calling and petty insults rather than answering to real issues. The First Amendment protects this kind of protest, of course, but the fact that it does, does not mean people should find it acceptable. Nancy may have acted alone, but she acted on the feelings of dozens of others, and the right of free speech goes both ways—Twitter users blasting Nancy for her actions are tamping her right to express her displeasure of the statue.

Men and women might have been created equal, but they still are not treated as such, and until equality is the case in all senses of the word, Nancy was justified to act on what she saw as offensive, because it was designed in a way that intentionally insulted women and dirtied an aspect of womanhood. So please, quasi-progressive op-ed writers and Twitter users, remember the misogyny that has followed Hillary’s—and every other professional woman’s—career before rushing to defend it.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleBob Dylan’s Nobel Prize Win Redefines the Boundaries of Literature
Next articleDr. Annie Segan and Photographer John Shearer discuss the legacy of storytelling in photojournalism

You may also like

Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy

Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand

Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top