• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Students Remember the Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsberg
      Students Remember the Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsberg
    • First-Year Students Reflect on Their Expectations for College, One Semester In
      First-Year Students Reflect on Their Expectations for College, One Semester In
    • “We Want to Fundamentally Change the Culture,” International Student Union says
      “We Want to Fundamentally Change the Culture,” International Student Union says
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • No image
      You have no valid reasons to oppose raising the minimum wage
    • No image
      Free the pee: cut the hygiene theater and let us use other bathrooms
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • “Judas and the Black Messiah” subverts, soars as Civil Rights story
      “Judas and the Black Messiah” subverts, soars as Civil Rights story
    • Black Entertainment Without Black Trauma: Recommendations for BHM!
      Black Entertainment Without Black Trauma: Recommendations for BHM!
    • Queer Storylines in “The Prom” Fall Flat
      Queer Storylines in “The Prom” Fall Flat
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • COVID-19: Popping the Wellesley Bubble
      COVID-19: Popping the Wellesley Bubble
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By thewellesleynews Opinions, Staff EditorialMarch 1, 2017

College should publicly disclose funding sources

Graphic by Jee Lee '19, Digital Editor

Following an announcement that the Freedom Project had accepted a large donation from the Charles Koch foundation, the Wellesley student community voiced aggravation and dissatisfaction with the College’s decision to permit this transfer of funds. While the money was exchanged with the stipulation that “the Freedom Project have absolute academic freedom and autonomy” according to Professor Thomas Cushman, we at The Wellesley News are disappointed that such information was not publicly disclosed to the student body. The reaction to this news is indicative of a larger issue: students are not made aware of how campus events are financed.

This sentiment is not exclusive to the Freedom Project. A number of official organizations on campus such as the Suzy Newhouse Center for the Humanities or the Madeleine Korbel Albright Institute for Global Affairs do not display benefactors on their websites beyond those who gave the respective organizations or individual fellowships their names. Even the grants that fund renovations are not disclosed. We certainly do not mean to imply that any on-campus institution is receiving suspicious donations, especially since all gifts must be approved by upper administration first. However, we do wish to express that the community as a whole would benefit from knowing how our programs are funded.

Understanding how our programs are financed is an opportunity for us to reflect on the potential biases that might inform certain event choices. While most money is gifted to the college without strings attached, it is important that students be aware of such conditions, especially in the event that money is granted with specifications. Knowledge of donation sources would foster thoughtful, campuswide communication. For instance, students have criticized the College’s renovations to the new dorms and continued neglect of older buildings without realizing that the funding for this project was gifted conditionally. Transparency would have encouraged a more thoughtful dialogue surrounding housing reform.

Furthermore, if money is granted with stipulations, there is a possibility that certain speakers brought to campus may reflect the biases of the donors. While it is unclear whether this is the case, public disclosure would dispel misunderstandings and speculation among students. Accusations regarding connections between funding and guests have long been made, but simple directives from the College would keep us better informed and prevent rumors from floating around. As students, we should be aware of the benefactors who fund our institution, and we should consider them in ongoing dialogues. We do not mean to argue that students should not attend events based on their funding, but it should be a choice we can all make based on the information given to us. At the very least, we should be able to know if the speakers brought to campus reflect a particular set of values, in order to promote engaging discourse regarding the free exchange of ideas.

We also recognize that donors have a right to maintain their anonymity, and we do not wish to infringe upon that. The College, even if funding sources were to be made public, should respect the privacy of individuals who do not wish to be recognized. Nevertheless, transparency surrounding the process by which money enters different programs would be beneficial. While we have a rudimentary understanding that President Johnson must approve gifts before they are transferred, it would be valuable to know what decisions are made during those discussions. A simple publication of some of the questions that might arise would be advantageous for students.

The Wellesley community and its ongoing dialogues would benefit from information regarding gifts made to the college. Knowledge of who or what organizations support our programs is crucial for productive and engaging conversations, as well as student involvement and understanding.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleThe federal government is too negligent of infrastructural failings
Next articleCultural alienation leads to increased extremism in the Caribbean

You may also like

You have no valid reasons to oppose raising the minimum wage

Free the pee: cut the hygiene theater and let us use other bathrooms

A piece of pizza missing topings.

Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

  • Harry Styles de-typifies masculinity in Vogue’s December Iss...
  • Students Remember the Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsberg
  • Queer Storylines in “The Prom” Fall Flat
  • Free the pee: cut the hygiene theater and let us use other b...
  • You have no valid reasons to oppose raising the minimum wage

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top