• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
      Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
    • Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age
      Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age
    • Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation
      Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Controversial
      The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Controversial
    • Lucy Dacus Brings a Minimal Yet Powerful Performance to Northeastern University
      Lucy Dacus Brings a Minimal Yet Powerful Performance to Northeastern University
    • “Glass Onion” Takes Shots at Easy Targets
      “Glass Onion” Takes Shots at Easy Targets
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Rejected Snooze Articles for the Week
      Rejected Snooze Articles for the Week
    • Happy Valentine’s Day from Spog
      Happy Valentine’s Day from Spog
    • The Four Best Places to Loudly FaceTime Someone on Campus
      The Four Best Places to Loudly FaceTime Someone on Campus
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Christine Arumainayagam OpinionsSeptember 29, 2017

Slang should be adopted into newer versions of dictionary

Photo courtesy of Keith Brofsky/Getty Images

Merriam-Webster, now almost 200 years old, is one of America’s most popular dictionaries. This September, their editors announced that they have added more than 250 words to the dictionary— a modest addition compared to last February’s 1,000 new words.

The new words from this month range from ‘froyo’ to ‘pregame’ to ‘alt-right.’ Many of these new words will be met with raised eyebrows. Whenever new words are added to the dictionary—especially slang words—there’s always backlash from older generations that would rather dig their heels in the past and cleanse the English language of impurities. These people may think that our language is regressing.

But as Merriam-Webster wisely states on their website, “As always, the expansion of the dictionary mirrors the the expansion of the language.” If a word becomes popular, there’s no reason it shouldn’t be included in the dictionary, even if some believe that slang doesn’t have a place there. The dictionary isn’t forcing people to use those words. It’s merely providing a tool to understand them.

Adding new words to the dictionary is not a simple process. Editors, or lexicographers, of any dictionary keep a close eye on language trends. When they notice a word surging in popularity, they take note. Lexicographers spend hours reading various published materials, including books, magazines and websites. When they notice that a new word is becoming popular, they put the word into a ling system that includes the spelling, the context and the citations. Merriam-Webster’s ling system began as early as the 1880s.

But popularity isn’t the only criterion; to be added to the dictionary, words must be used across a wide variety of sources over an extended period of time. There is no specific number of citations or a specific length of time that must pass, as the lexicographers make decisions on a case-by-case basis.

Sometimes new words are connected to current events and die off fairly quickly. Sometimes the words have been around for a while, and just haven’t gotten the stamp of approval yet. Often, new words reflect advancing technology, and sometimes they’re clearly born from the internet—like the word ‘troll,’ for instance. Some recent additions include the words ‘selfie’ and ‘binge-watch.’ These words have become incorporated into our everyday speech, so it only makes sense that we should be able to find them in the dictionary.

Merriam-Webster even has a separate page called “New Words & Slang” for user-submitted words that haven’t quite emerged from the fringes and into everyday use, or that haven’t yet passed through the necessary research stages to allow them to take their spot in the dictionary. Examples of these include ‘woot’ and ‘ginormous.’

When people police words, or ridicule people for not using ‘proper English,’ we head down a slippery slope. Is there really a single correct way to speak English? That belief can lead to classism, because not everyone in America lives in a white, upper-middle-class suburb. Distinct words and phrases can emerge from communities that don’t fall into this category, and there isn’t a good reason why one way of speaking should be considered superior to the other.

Words can acquire alternate meanings as people stray from dictionary definitions. Take the word ‘literally,’ for example. I’ve met people who are outraged about sentences such as: ‘I’m literally going to explode.’ They’d most likely be outraged if they knew that this second usage of the word ‘literally’ has become so common that it has found its way into the pages of Merriam-Webster.

Some want the dictionary to remain stagnant. But English is always evolving—perhaps much faster than ever before now that the majority of us have access to the internet. Additionally, English has the highest population of non-native speakers. Incorporating new words and phrases into dictionaries and our own vocabularies certainly isn’t a new phenomenon.

Personally, I want to be able to look up the definition word up in Merriam-Webster without having to resort to the utter mayhem that is Urban Dictionary, where anyone can invent a new word out of the blue. It’s hard to tell which definitions actually represent the way the word is used and which ones are just pulling your leg (you might be interested to take a look at the most popular definition of ‘wellesley’).

Our language shapes the dictionary, not the other way around. The only reason your favorite historical figure wouldn’t have used the word ‘binge-watch’ was because Net ix didn’t exist yet. If language didn’t evolve, we’d all still be grunting and pointing.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleHarvard fails to live up to mission by rescinding fellowship to Chelsea Manning
Next articleU.S economic growth is aided by immigrant jobs

You may also like

Logos of social media apps such as Twitter, Tiktok, Netflix, Spotify, and Discord.

Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity

Abstract painting of various boxes meant to imply computer and phone screens

Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age

A collection of a wide variety of foods in the colors of the rainbow

Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation

4 Comments

  • Mommy says:
    May 7, 2018 at 4:59 PM

    Its huge change in language in no time since 20th century.New Slang words are coming in and going out so quick that with in years rooftop to underground.

    Reply
  • poop says:
    December 16, 2019 at 3:03 PM

    incredibly inaccurate bioch

    Reply
  • Your mom says:
    December 16, 2019 at 3:07 PM

    John I told you not to post on this website any more it’s dangerous plus you’re grounded for the bad word momma sees all remember that next time.

    Reply
  • poop says:
    December 17, 2019 at 2:05 PM

    fuck you

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

  • Logos of social media apps such as Twitter, Tiktok, Netflix, Spotify, and Discord. Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
  • Stone-Davis dining staff report mistreatment
  • The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Contro...
  • A collection of a wide variety of foods in the colors of the rainbow Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflat...
  • Red envelope that contains money to celebrate the Lunar New Year. America’s cultural appropriation is a modern form of i...

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top