• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
      Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
    • It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
      It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
    • What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
      What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • No image
      Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy
    • No image
      Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand
    • Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
      Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
      Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
    • Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
      Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
    • The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
      The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Elana Bridges Arts, Arts In The NewsOctober 4, 2017

Sarah Oppenheimer reconfigures our understanding of space and time

Oppenheimer’s 2012 installation piece, D-33 Photo courtesy of Sarah Oppenheimer

On Friday, a crowd of faculty, students and friends of the college joined together in Jewett Arts Center’s (JAC) 450 lecture room to hear from celebrated visual artist Sarah Oppenheimer.

One of Oppenheimer’s most notable projects is entitled “S-281913” and has been commissioned by Perez Art Museum Miami. “S-281913” consists of two glass structures that can be rotated on their axes to allow the viewers to manipulate the visual material present in their reflections. Oppenheimer’s visual art represents the overlap between sculpture and architecture.

The event began with a PowerPoint presentation and eventually moved out into the Jewett sculpture court.

The PowerPoint portion of her lecture dealt with conceptions of boundaries, arrays of space and the ways in which she has reconfigured these values to allow viewers to experience the combination of these concepts in an untraditional way. She described how the infrastructure of buildings shape the way people view art because integral structures, such as columns, are blind spots that interfere with what people experience. In addition to her focus on boundaries, Oppenheimer extensively discussed the idea of existing at several times in space. Time, like space, can overlap.  For example, people in a building exist in a different time than that of the building itself.  Thus, “you have the time of us in the building and the time of the building itself,” Oppenheimer said. She incorporated visual representations of her argument, to help the audience visualize a concept that goes against the seemingly-unchangeable nature of building structures. To bridge the conceptual gap between boundaries and time, Oppenheimer explained the movement of one space to another changes the isovist, which is the set of all points visible from a given vantage point with respect to an environment that is liable to change with position.

Oppenheimer prompted the large group to go downstairs into the Jewett Sculpture Garden and consider these ideas  while moving through the space. She urged her audience to think about how the objects in the space influenced what they saw and what they did not see, and how the absence of objects determined how they interacted with the space.

While moving throughout the sculpture garden, professors discussed how the space had changed and adapted to the needs of the community over time, highlighting Oppenheimer’s idea that boundaries are not fixed points but can be shifted and manipulated to control the flow of the space.

Oppenheimer was adamant about recognizing that all of her work comes from collaboration between her and her team. Whenever describing her work, she acknowledged the group effort it took create such a piece.

For example, she discussed  a project she completed for the PPOW gallery in New York. This work was a structure that dealt with the idea of spatial zones and the importance of not adhering to the predefined limits of a space, but reconfiguring the space to create an experience that highlights the temporal conditions of the work. With no background in physics, Oppenheimer embodies the notion that one can learn anything one is interested in. She began as a painter but quickly changed professions when she realized that painting could not help her solve the problem of depth and how one can manipulate it. She was fascinated with not only creating the parametric model she worked so hard to construct, but also understanding in the dynamics of how people interact with her work.

After the lecture ended, the conversation continued in JAC 354 during a lunch reception.

Oppenheimer sat with Wellesley students and spoke to them about their interests and fields of studies. She discussed the spontaneity of life and the importance of the ability to adapt to change and keep an open mind.  Without that outlook, Oppenheimer said, “I would have never been an architect.” “You can make any problem interesting, and if you are interested in a problem, you can always learn how to solve it,” she said.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleThe Great British Bake Off retains its wholesome charm
Next articleErin Judge ’02 and Lynn Sternberger ’07 discuss writing, Wellesley, and creative career paths

You may also like

Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy

Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand

Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top