• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
      Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
    • It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
      It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
    • What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
      What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • No image
      Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy
    • No image
      Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand
    • Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
      Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
      Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
    • Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
      Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
    • The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
      The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Samantha Churchill OpinionsNovember 8, 2017

EPA scientists cannot serve government properly when barred from presenting ndings

Photo courtesy of Aaron P. Golstein/Getty Images

Wellesley students have a long, proud history of public service, but in the current political climate it has become increasingly clear that, for scientists as well as other professionals, working for government agencies is no longer the most effective way to serve the public. A few weeks ago, several Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) scientists were barred from presenting at a conference in Providence, RI regarding the Narragansett Bay Estuary Program. These scientists were originally supposed to discuss a report that analyzed the effects of climate change on sea level, ocean and air temperature and fish populations. One scientist was set to give the keynote address at one workshop and was forced to cancel his speaking engagement only a few days before the conference. Many scientists and democratic members of Congress have expressed outrage at what they have justifiably deemed an act of scientific censorship. The Trump administration has made a point of minimizing and even denying the scientifically proven effects of climate change, but this does not give them license to unilaterally control which data is presented and discussed.

The decision to block these scientists from presenting their findings came from the EPA headquarters in Washington which is run by administrator Scott Pruitt. Pruitt was appointed by President Trump and has also rejected the scientific consensus on climate change. Additionally, Pruitt sued the EPA to challenge the Cross State Air Pollution Rule less than three years ago. While it may initially seem nonsensical to appoint a climate change denier to head the EPA, it is exactly what we should expect from this administration. Trump’s campaign was not based on carefully crafted policies to address national issues, but rather on the exploitation of feelings. Any facts that did not t the narrative he was trying to tell were casually dismissed as “fake news.” Under Pruitt’s leadership the Trump administration has the power to suppress any scientific findings that come out of the EPA that do not t the beliefs of the administration.

Many partisan issues are a question of what the ideal outcome of any given policy should be. In most cases, the two major parties have very different ideas of what an ideal immigration, welfare or abortion policy would look like, and they have different ideas about the best way to implement those policies. But in most of these cases, both sides can generally agree that there is an issue that needs to be addressed. Climate change differs from many of these highly partisan issues in that we cannot even agree that it is a real issue, much less what the best way to solve it might be. The rest of the world has not only agreed that climate change is a real problem, but they have also settled on what they believe is the best way to address it by signing the Paris Climate Accord. Now that Nicaragua and Syria have both signed the treaty, the U.S. has become the sole holdout.

Despite the fact that there is a sweeping consensus in the scientific community, many conservatives still deny the validity of climate change. By not allowing EPA scientists to present their findings the Trump administration has demonstrated its willingness to compromise the integrity of the EPA for the sake of the administration’s agenda. In theory, the EPA, which was founded by republican Richard Nixon, is supposed to be a nonpartisan agency with a primary mission to protect human and environmental health, but that becomes difficult to do when scientists are barred from discussing their findings. This administration has a tendency to ignore the urgings of experts in favor of pursuing policy that is inconsequential or even dangerous, but that makes their supporters feel heard. Sometimes we forget that the U.S. is in fact not a pure democracy but rather a democratic republic. This means

that we elect representatives to look after our interests and craft policy on issues that are much too large or complex for the average person to make an informed decision on. The purpose of agencies like the EPA is to provide the government with the necessary information it needs to make informed decisions. But when these findings fall on deaf ears, it leaves many scientists justifiably outraged.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleMulticultural requirement must be de ned and expanded to t needs of students
Next articleLetter to the Editor

You may also like

Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification

It’s time to put traditional grading to the test

Banner reading this website has been seized over images of a book shelf

What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top