• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
      Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
    • It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
      It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
    • What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
      What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • No image
      Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy
    • No image
      Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand
    • Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
      Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
      Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
    • Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
      Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
    • The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
      The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Alexandra Stanford OpinionsNovember 15, 2017

Reclaiming spaces at Wellesley will only be useful if students have input in the process

Photo by Lien Dao '20, Photo Editor

I pass the old Cafe Hoop weekly on my way to WZLY in the basement of Billings. The old painted Hoop sign adorns the doorway, and the walls are covered in the rambling scrawls of old Hoopies. The hallways are narrow, and the doorways are low; I can’t quite decide if it makes me feel nostalgic, claustrophobic or both. What I do know is that with a few couches, some string lights and funky rugs, the place might be able to reclaim its glory days as a fsocial space. Right now, it is used as a storage space and nothing else.

There are three distinct issues on campus causing social strain at Wellesley that call for attention. The first is that several minority groups on campus have yet to receive spaces of their own, which leads to decreased social organizing and satisfaction within these groups alongside a greater dissatisfaction with Wellesley’s ability to accommodate them socially. The second and third issues are on a broader scale, involving the lack of spaces for informal student organizing and a culture of high academic stress which ultimately impedes the creation of a more unified social atmosphere on campus. As conversations about how to renew old, neglected spaces on campus like the old Hoop space in Billings continue, it is imperative that we keep these three issues in mind, or these renewed spaces will fail to solve any aspect of the social strain at Wellesley.

College Government has recently announced the creation of a task force in charge of assessing spaces like Billings for the potential to convert them into additional social spaces on campus. Conversations about Wellesley’s lackluster social scene have been increasing in intensity around campus, and this announcement indicates that conversations like these are beginning to inspire action. The task force was formed partially in response to a town hall meeting held on the state of social interaction at Wellesley, where community members voiced opinions and concerns.

I sent out an informal poll with the intention of gauging opinion on the satisfaction of social spaces at Wellesley. I wanted to see if I could organize the social strain into concrete issues that might be addressed by the spaces being considered (like the old Hoop space in Billings.) The poll included a rating (0-10) of social satisfaction and several follow-up questions concerning current social space. Participants were also asked to say if they thought adding social spaces would help. The answer was a resounding yes, with several caveats.

The first broad issue affecting social satisfaction with Wellesley is the lack of dedicated spaces for certain groups on campus. While several spaces on campus are dedicated to various minority communities—Harambee House for students of African descent, Slater for International Students, etc.—there was one house that was mentioned in several responses: Acorns. Acorns is currently split between students who identify as Asian (Pan-Asian) or Latinx, but also houses advisors for Fusion and LGBTQ+ communities. It’s a small house for these student groups to share, a fact that discourages many students within these groups. Respondents expressed interest in the reclaimed spaces being designed specifically by and for cultural/minority groups like these. Other minority groups on campus like First-Gen also advocated for the spaces to be dedicated to this purpose.

The second issue is that students expressed dissatisfaction with the general social structure of Wellesley. Parties thrown on campus, they complained, are held either in private spaces where noise complaints are common (e.g. dorms) or in larger, public places where administrative presence is heavy (e.g. Tishman.) Both of these factors, they argue, are impediments to building the social connections so many students want to have on campus.

In more informal social spaces like El Table and Hoop, a different problem arises: homework follows students like a second shadow, contributing to the “stress culture” so often referred to at Wellesley.

In the poll, these were the three issues cited most often for the average social satisfaction score of 4.93 out of 10. This number was calculated based on the ratings between zero and 10 that students gave of their own social satisfaction at Wellesley, but the three issues above were found in the sections that asked students to elaborate on their answers. Although this poll is by no means perfect nor representative of the entire Wellesley population—in fact, a small fraction of respondents were perfectly content—it is essential that we pay attention to the three issues stated above. At Wellesley, we should strive to foster physical, social and emotional safe spaces for all students; simply because there are people already satisfied does not mean we should stop trying to improve the social atmosphere for those who are not.

What, then, should be the purpose of these reclaimed spaces? The kinds of reclaimed spaces I envision for Wellesley are  a constellation of individual spaces each unique to its own purpose. A space each for LGBTQ+, Latinx, First-Gen, Fusion, Pan-Asian, students among others. And ultimately, I envision another space furnished in funky rugs, rambling scrawls, and soft lights; a space where members of all groups can convene, where homework can never follow, and where individual rooms are up for reservation on a regular basis.

This means there are lot of conversations that need to happen, and it is ultimately up to the new task force to research and begin these sorts of conversations. With the proper amount of research, community input and, more pragmatically, funding, CG just might have a great idea on their hands—but only if they continue to send out polls, to hold town meetings, and to engage the members of the Wellesley community to decide what they want to see in such reclaimed social spaces. This collaboration is the only way that reclaiming spaces like Billings will have any effect on the social culture at Wellesley, and it is the approach CG must take for the spaces to be a success.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleThe Queen’s involvement in the Paradise Papers highlights the need for financial reform
Next articleThe opioid epidemic cannot be properly addressed as a public health emergency

You may also like

Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification

It’s time to put traditional grading to the test

Banner reading this website has been seized over images of a book shelf

What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top