• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Four Cases of COVID-19 Reported During Winter Break
      Four Cases of COVID-19 Reported During Winter Break
    • Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
      Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
    • Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
      Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • The block system is a joke
      The block system is a joke
    • Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
      Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
      Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
    • Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
      Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
    • “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
      “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • No image
      Maintaining wellness as the cold sets in
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Annabel Thompson Arts, Arts In The NewsMarch 7, 2018

Proposed “Stone Butch Blues” film raises questions about authorial legacies

Stone Butch Blues cover

Note: Leslie Feinberg used both she/her and zie/hir pronouns over the course of hir life. This article follows the style of Feinberg’s literary executor and uses both sets of pronouns.

The online 20th Anniversary Edition of the late Leslie Feinberg’s 1993 novel “Stone Butch Blues” includes a lengthy author’s note. It contains, among other things, Feinberg’s explanation about the long process zie went through to recover author’s rights, hir intentions to keep the novel available for free and a blanket response to requests for permission to make adaptations or derivative works. That response reads, in part: “No permissions, no contracts, no commercial use, no derivative use, no digital rights…No adaptations: don’t tell me you’re honoring me by saying you can tell this story better than I did.” She goes on to specify that she does not give permission for film adaptations, writing, “I don’t believe any movie can be made true to the intention of the book.”

However, an independent studio called 11B Productions is planning on adapting “Stone Butch Blues” anyway. A casting call was recently placed on Backstage.com for the role of the main character, and 11B Productions has listed the film on its website, with no information other than “coming soon.” The casting call has raised difficult questions about the nature of intellectual property, about respect for the legacies of artists and about how, if at all, a film adaptation of this novel could be successful.

“Stone Butch Blues,” a semi-autobiographical novel about a butch named Jess Goldberg who comes of age in the 1960s and has a complex relationship with gender, still holds great importance in the literary world, in the lesbian community and in the LGBTQ community as a whole 20 years after the novel’s publication and four years after Feinberg’s death. Among the many powerful aspects of the novel is its willingness and ability to talk about the complexities of gender, particularly for butch lesbians.

It’s also an incredibly heavy novel, dealing with rape and police brutality. As Feinberg wrote in the author’s note, “I worked briefly on a movie version of ‘Stone Butch Blues’ until I discovered that the producer’s prospectus was trying to raise capital from investors by offering a sexual fantasy: an invitation to watch butches being raped by police. I requested that no movie be made.”

Slate, an online publication that covers culture, and a few online commenters have speculated that the soon-to-be-film stemmed from this past, abandoned project. But we don’t know enough about the circumstances that led to the casting call to know whether or not the current project is legal. However, assuming that it is, this is still disrespectful to the author’s legacy.

Feinberg is hardly the only author to request that no film adaptation be made of hir work. J.D. Salinger was famously, vehemently, against any film adaptation of “Catcher in the Rye” and Gabriel García Márquez only wanted a film of “One Hundred Years in Solitude” under very specific — and nearly impossible — conditions: two minutes of film would be released each year for 100 years. Two core ideas often motivate authors to retain film rights for their novels: distrust of the film industry, as in Salinger’s case, when Hollywood’s mishandling of an earlier work of his led to him swearing off it forever, and the belief that some stories are better told the way they are. Feinberg notes both of these beliefs in hir author’s note. At the end of the day, however, it can be seen as worrisome when an author’s work is co-opted after their death, no matter the reason. Feinberg’s work is hers, and she requested it be kept solely in novel form to preserve her vision. Going against hir wishes after hir death, especially for such a historically important piece of work by a marginalized creator, feels disrespectful.

There’s also the issue of Hollywood mishandling LGBTQ stories. “I’d like to think that a successful, respectful and sensitive film could be made of ‘Stone Butch Blues,’” Wellesley College professor of American studies Paul Fisher said over email. “But the question in the abstract is different from the actual practice of the film industry, which doesn’t have a great track record, especially in representing trans stories and characters.” The fact that the filmmakers want to cast a transgender actor as Jess is at least a step in the right direction, considering how many Hollywood movies cast cisgender actors to play trans characters, most recently in films like “The Danish Girl” (starring Eddie Redmayne) and “Anything” (starring Matt Bomer).

Yet doing so is problematic in its own way. While Jess is definitely on the trans spectrum, the entire novel is about how complex their gender is. The casting call specifically calls for actors who are trans men and transmasculine nonbinary people and does not mention butch lesbians. This is in spite of the fact that many butch lesbians have journeys similar to Jess’, including going on hormones, getting top surgery and even transitioning, and then detransitioning. The fact that butch lesbians are excluded from the casting call could suggest a better-than-average understanding of issues of trans representation in Hollywood, but it could also suggest a flattening of Jess’ gender identity.

The fact that the role only calls for Caucasian actors is also an issue. It isn’t whitewashing per se: while Jess is Jewish, their race is left ambiguous. However, this ambiguity is important in the novel, as Feinberg writes: “For derivative artists, intent on making derivative art using a narrative I have written, this means that they take their individual idea of who is Black or white, fat or thin, able-bodied or disabled— and the derivative artist flattens and concretizes their own interpretation for all time, as if that’s the truth of ‘Stone Butch Blues’ for all time and all readers.” Insisting that Jess must be white also oversimplifies their character and tells a particular story – one that is less ambiguous and less complex than that in the novel.

Regardless of what happens with the film, “Stone Butch Blues” will always be an important novel. “Leslie Feinberg’s books have done a lot for trans liberation, and it would be great if a film could continue that work,” said Fisher, “but that’s a tall order.” He added, “Whether or not a film gets made, everybody should read the book — and they should read it before seeing the movie!”

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous article“What the Funk” and all your other LipSync questions, answered
Next articleThe psychology of secular saints: Americans worship celebrities for better or worse

You may also like

Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester

Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart

“Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

  • Four Cases of COVID-19 Reported During Winter Break

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top