• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
      Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
    • It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
      It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
    • What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
      What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • No image
      Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy
    • No image
      Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand
    • Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
      Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
      Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
    • Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
      Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
    • The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
      The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Tabitha Wilson OpinionsApril 5, 2018

Google still needs to strive for diversity in the midst of lawsuits

Photo Courtesy of The Verge

The recent lawsuit against Google regarding its hiring practices is just a drop in the large pool of conversations regarding diversity and inclusion in large tech companies. The plaintiff, Arne Wilburg, a YouTube recruiter who was employed by Google for several years, claims that the company was discriminatory towards white and Asian men in its hiring process. Wilburg states that he was instructed to hire only those from “historically underrepresented groups” and alleges that Google “purges” applications from white and Asian males. While Wilburg’s claims may seem alarming to many, Google’s company statistics are far more alarming. Google’s total workforce is 69 percent male. Its technical workforce is even less impressive, with 80 percent male employees; of these, 92 percent are either white or Asian. If Google implemented some of the hiring processes that Wilburg mentioned, it has had little to no effect on the company overall. In fact, it will take radical reforms to change the lack of diversity within tech companies. Although Google’s actions lacked the right language and implementation, it should not be demonized for trying to fix such a prevalent problem within its company. In a company that is so enormously homogenous, Google recruiters should be excited to hire new and diverse talent; Wilburg’s lawsuit simply demonstrates resistance to change within the company and ignorance about diversity and discrimination.

Companies like Google have failed to hire employees from underrepresented backgrounds for far too long. Google only began reporting its diversity statistics in 2014, revealing that the company workforce was 61 percent male and less than five percent Black and Hispanic. When a company is overwhelmingly white and male, it discourages those who do not fit those characteristics from applying for jobs there. Even when women and people of color send in their applications, they are challenged with the inherent biases of the majority white and male recruiters. Unfortunately, white men are more inclined to hire people that look like themselves and hold negative stereotypes about women and people of color, even if they do so unconsciously. This creates a vicious cycle in which people from underrepresented groups are continuously left out—either by not getting a position that they were qualified for in favor of a less diverse candidate or by deciding to not apply in the first place. Both of these options put Google at a disadvantage in terms of growing a more diverse workplace. Applicants that take themselves of out Google’s hiring pool possibly do the same for other companies and then end up at smaller firms. It is also a lot to ask of candidates to join a space where they will clearly be a very small minority. Herein lies Google’s greatest challenge: how do they attract and hire diverse candidates while they currently have such a homogenous workforce?

Google’s response to this dilemma has been sloppy. If they indeed instructed recruiters to solely consider applicants from underrepresented groups and disregard traditional, white and Asian male applicants, recruiters could then feel that the more diverse applicants are less viable, and other employees would be aware of the “favor” being give to diverse applicants. Current employees can feel that newer, more diverse recruits used their identities rather than merit to secure their position. This can also perpetuate a culture in which nontraditional applicants and employees feel less welcome. Google needs to explain to recruiters that they do have inherent biases that must be addressed and also have workforce training to help dismantle problematic culture. This may result in a more holistic application process, similar to that of colleges and universities, or perhaps in an independent review board for candidates that has a more diverse audience. Throughout this lawsuit, and others similar to it, Google should still continue to strive for diversity.

Wilburg’s lawsuit shows of his lack of knowledge regarding diversity and inclusion. A company that is largely white and male cannot discriminate against white males. The system that Google has operated under, as well as society at large, places white males at an extreme advantage. Recruiters like Wilburg should check their privilege and seek to make sure that the company has a more diverse workforce instead of hiring a homogeneous one.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleImmigration issues should not be decided by partisan courts
Next articleHillary Clinton should fight for all women, not only those who support her

You may also like

Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification

It’s time to put traditional grading to the test

Banner reading this website has been seized over images of a book shelf

What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top