• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Students Remember the Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsberg
      Students Remember the Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsberg
    • First-Year Students Reflect on Their Expectations for College, One Semester In
      First-Year Students Reflect on Their Expectations for College, One Semester In
    • “We Want to Fundamentally Change the Culture,” International Student Union says
      “We Want to Fundamentally Change the Culture,” International Student Union says
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • The block system is a joke
      The block system is a joke
    • Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
      Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • Harry Styles de-typifies masculinity in Vogue’s December Issue, but is this enough? (spoiler: it’s not)
      Harry Styles de-typifies masculinity in Vogue’s December Issue, but is this enough? (spoiler: it’s not)
    • Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
      Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
    • Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
      Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • No image
      Maintaining wellness as the cold sets in
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Kelechi Alfred-Igbokwe ArtsApril 11, 2018

Your mediocre art isn’t being censored

A still from Birth of A Nation. Photo Courtesy of The New Yorker.

Ah, the age-old question: is restricting art on any grounds a form of censorship? This is a slippery slope. Are we better off letting artists say their piece without censure? Artists are often the people who are most vulnerable to censorship. Oftentimes, when a work of art can be ‘backed up’ by having some sort of ¨deeper meaning,” the artist is given leeway to produce shocking and horrific images that fall outside of society´s typical boundaries.

Censorship of art returned to the forefront after Saul Levine, a film professor at Massachusetts College of Art and Design (MassArt) — the only public arts school in the country — showed a film in his senior thesis class which contained graphic, sexually explicit footage featuring himself and his partner. He was reported by students to the Title IX coordinator of the school, who swiftly set up a meeting with Levine. He was initially asked to leave his position at MassArt, only to be quickly reinstated after strident backlash from other artists, fearing for their own freedom of expression.

As an artist and an appreciator of the arts, I recognize that we are too often the target of unnecessary social restrictions. Art is at its highest quality when there are no rules or hang ups. Regulations can inhibit the creative vision. So, I get it. Artists are meant to upend the status quo, think outside the box, march to the beat of their own drum. When one prominent artist is struck down for a bold statement, the instinct is to cry out against it because who knows who will be next? Freedom of expression should be protected.

However, it is also important to ponder what art is validated by institutions, and what art is disregarded. Saul Levine’s art is not at all acceptable in the classroom. It has no grounds for educational purposes, as it cannot be put in any historical or cultural context that lends the film any legitimacy. It is not a marker of technical feats that are essential to the learning of future film directors. It is not even art that should be up for debate. The school has every right to fire a professor who is showing classroom material outside of the bounds of healthy scholarship.

One classic example of a film that seems inappropriate but should still be taught due to its historical importance is “The Birth of a Nation” (1915). This film, set in the ‘Old South’ during Reconstruction after the Civil War, is widely known for portraying African-Americans in a dehumanizing light and for promoting racial intolerance. At the time, it was used to show why African-Americans should not be given rights lest they overrun their white counterparts in ‘savage’ ways. The film depicts African-American men as “subhuman,” possessing “vicious bestiality” and “primitive sexuality,” as Leon Litwack wrote in “Past Imperfect: History According to the Movies.” A major theme of “The Birth of a Nation’’ is the supposed danger that hypersexualized black men pose to white women and all the prominent Black characters are played by white actors in Blackface. At the same time, this notoriously offensive film is still taught in film classes and Roger Ebert, a renowned film critic, said that it is “the first great narrative film.” It is perceived as the “first true cinematic epic” and is regarded as culturally, artistically and technically important. While the film is still taught in film courses, its racist imagery is highlighted and it is recognized as a form of white supremacist propaganda that glorifies the Ku Klux Klan. As such, the film makes sense within its context and has a relevant educational purpose.

Of course, whether or not “The Birth of a Nation” should still be taught in schools is debatable. However, there should not be a debate over whether educators have the right to dismiss it as a teachable piece of art because they believe that its racist depictions outweigh its artistic legitimacy. “The Birth of a Nation” has value because it is a clear depiction of the racist ideologies that are truly sewn into the fabric of our country’s history. Untouchable art it is not.

On the other end of the spectrum is Saul Levin’s ‘art,’ which is in no way acceptable in the classroom. Although he claims his intent was to examine gender and power dynamics through sexuality, the film is no great feat, no magnum opus, no story of our time. I saw the film myself, and anybody who claims that it is necessary for classroom learning is delusional. Are we giving him a pass because he has constructed a greater social intent to his crude sexual content? If so, why are we doing so?

It is not censorship to protect students from being unduly subjected to obscenities by a person who is in a position of power. Great art will live another day. This just isn’t it.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleFrances McDormand’s mention of inclusion riders could be impactful
Next article“A Quiet Place” is fine, but not nearly as clever as it thinks it is

You may also like

Harry Styles de-typifies masculinity in Vogue’s December Issue, but is this enough? (spoiler: it’s not)

Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester

Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

  • Harry Styles de-typifies masculinity in Vogue’s December Iss...
  • Students Remember the Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsberg

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top