• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
      Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
    • It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
      It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
    • What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
      What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • No image
      Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy
    • No image
      Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand
    • Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
      Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
      Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
    • Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
      Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
    • The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
      The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Alexandria Otero, Erin Kelly OpinionsOctober 3, 2018

Elections Committee should be given the benefit of the doubt

On Sept. 15, Wellesley students elected a College Government President (CGP) after two failed attempts last spring. Although we as a student body were finally able to elect a representative, the race was not without controversy. On Sept. 24, a member of one of the candidates’ campaign teams tweeted negatively about another candidate. According to the Elections Committee (EC), the tweet interfered with another candidate’s campaign, which is classified as a Tier 3 violation, resulting in removal from the ballot. Upon finding out this information, we were skeptical about EC’s decision to remove the candidate from the ballot given past controversies with College Government (CG) elections. After reading through the Special Elections handbook, however, we came to the conclusion that in this instance, the candidate’s removal from the ballot was warranted under EC guidelines. As we completed more in-depth research for this piece, we came to realize that we as students should take more time to inform ourselves about institutions such as CG throughout the year rather than hastily pass judgment in the heat of campus-wide controversy.

We have not always agreed with Elections Committee decisions in the past. Often times, campaign violations seem to be arbitrary and don’t take into account students’ lives outside of campaign season. For example, in the College Government 2017 elections a student’s campaign was penalized because a member of the campaign team removed spam of another candidate in their role as an RA. Violations such as that were widely viewed as unfair because they penalized a student for fulfilling their campus job. Inevitably, this experience has left a sour taste in the mouths of students regarding rules of Elections Committee and we were no different. When evaluating EC’s decision to remove the candidate from the ballot, we allowed past experiences with CG and the Elections Committee to cloud our judgment before we had done adequate research.

According to this year’s special elections handbook, candidates or campaign members cannot interfere with another candidate’s campaign, including but not limited to “personal attacks” which warrant a Tier 3 violation and automatic removal from the ballot. The handbook specifies that these rules do not apply only to the candidate, but also to members of their campaign team. These rules were provided to all of the candidates and were accessible online to the entire student body. The member of the campaign team clearly violated the guidelines EC developed for this election and therefore the subsequent removal from the ballot was warranted. Whether or not the structure or “tiering” of the rules by EC is appropriate is another question that can be discussed prior to future elections.

We do not hold the events that took place in this election against the candidate or the member of her campaign team. Mistakes happen, especially in student elections. We doubt the person who sent the tweet intended to break EC’s rules or hurt anyone’s feelings. However, we understand the position of EC as a body that is tasked to ensure fair elections for all students running.

Our main concern is that students, including ourselves, have not given EC the benefit of the doubt when it comes to violations that happen during Wellesley College Government Campaigns. Now that we have done our research, we come to realize that EC has taken into account past controversies –– such as the RA controversy from 2017 –– and revised their standards. We have also accounted for the fact that members of EC are students just like us and are trying their best to run successful, transparent and fair elections.

With that being said, we are not saying that the current process is perfect. For example,  EC can definitely revise their “tiering structure” to leave more margin for error. However, in this instance we feel EC did the right thing this special elections given the explicit guidelines they laid out in their handbook. After this experience, we have learned to not base our opinions of institutions like CG on experiences that happened a year ago. Just as we expect EC and CG to cut candidates and campaigns some slack, we should afford them the same courtesy.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleRemix: Idealization Inspires Disappointment
Next articleAnita Hill and Christine Blasey Ford: a black and white issue?

You may also like

Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification

It’s time to put traditional grading to the test

Banner reading this website has been seized over images of a book shelf

What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top