• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
      Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
    • It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
      It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
    • What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
      What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • No image
      Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy
    • No image
      Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand
    • Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
      Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
      Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
    • Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
      Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
    • The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
      The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Sarah Young OpinionsNovember 7, 2018

Atheists have the ability to alter election outcomes

Photo Courtesy of Getty Images

Disclaimer: for the purpose of this article, “atheist” refers to those who don’t believe in God or view themselves as having no religion, or as Pew calls them, “nones.”

 

         Atheism has played an important, if controversial, part in American political history — specifically when it comes to religious freedom. If you look at religious freedom cases brought before the US Supreme Court, you will see that many involve atheists, especially cases pertaining to religion in schools. Atheists are the reason public schools cannot teach religion, why students  don’t start their mornings with classroom prayers and why, at the end of their education, there will not be a member of the clergy speaking at their graduation. But these are just examples from the mid to late 1900s when atheists were few in number.

According to the Pew Research Center, the number of atheists has been growing significantly over the years.  Their estimate ranges from 17-35 percent of American adults, but a “most credible indirect estimate” is 26 percent.  With these numbers, atheists have the ability to become the largest religious voting bloc in America, beating out Catholics at 20.8 percent and evangelicals at 25.4 percent.

         These numbers are so significant, you might wonder why they aren’t being talked about.  To begin with, this is uncharted territory for atheists. Atheists have been ignored by politicians for years, especially on the right. Conservative tend to emphasize religious values because their base largely identifies as religious.  David Silverman, the president of American Atheists from 2010 until 2018, demonstrated this to a wider audience when he was featured on the late night show “Full Frontal With Samantha Bee.” It showed him at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) trying to engage in dialogue with conservatives.  Most of the conversations led nowhere –– except some people saying they would pray for him. Others still said that they would never vote for an atheist, some going as far as to say that a man who does not start his morning in prayer cannot be trusted to be president.

         Seeing this, it is no coincidence that atheists lean Democrat.  In fact, Pew found that while 69 percent of atheists identify as or lean Democrat, only 15 percent of atheists are/lean Republican, with the remaining 17 percent claiming neutrality.  Still, the question remains: why are atheists –– potentially one of the biggest voting blocs in America –– ignored and even rejected from mainstream politics?

         Well, part of it comes down to actual voting records.  While there are more atheists of voting age in America than Catholics, Catholics vote more reliably.  In fact, the Public Religion Research Institute found that while the rate of atheism in America has dramatically increased over the past two decades, very little has changed in the number of those who vote.  The study was concluded after the 2014 election, but we see the percent of registered atheist voters rising steadily while they still only make up about 10-12 percent of the voting population in America.

         If a higher percent of atheists vote in this election, they could have a huge impact on the outcome of the midterms.  With the rise of the religious right, many question whether the political pendulum is getting ready to swing in the opposite direction.  With 69 percent of atheists leaning Democrat, could it be possible that they can make the “Blue Wave” a reality?

 

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleClimate Change is here, and it’s not your fault
Next articleMeaningful conversation is ensnared by social etiquette

You may also like

Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification

It’s time to put traditional grading to the test

Banner reading this website has been seized over images of a book shelf

What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top