facebook icon facebook icon facebook icon
  • About
  • ADS
  • Masthead
    • Editorial Board
  • Submission
  • Subscribe
The Wellesley News -
  • News
    • Contract ratified by Wellesley’s Maintenance and Service Employees Union
      Contract ratified by Wellesley’s Maintenance and Service Employees Union
    • News in Brief
      News in Brief
    • Wellesley adapts to end of race conscious admissions
      Wellesley adapts to end of race conscious admissions
    • Senate Report
    • News in Brief
  • Features
    • Professor Spotlight: Dr. Faisal Ahmed
      Professor Spotlight: Dr. Faisal Ahmed
    • Spotlight: New Professor Kathryn Winner
      Spotlight: New Professor Kathryn Winner
    • Spotlight: New Professor Lucia Nhamo ’11
      Spotlight: New Professor Lucia Nhamo ’11
    • Humans of Wellesley
    • Archives
  • Opinions
    • France’s Abaya Ban Unveils Its Own Misogyny
      France’s Abaya Ban Unveils Its Own Misogyny
    • Editorial: In defense of affirmative action
      Editorial: In defense of affirmative action
    • I am an NCAA champion: we should end college recruiting
      I am an NCAA champion: we should end college recruiting
    • Editorials
    • Letters to Editors
  • Arts
    • Bottoms is the Best Queer Comedy of the Year, and Wellesley College agrees!
      Bottoms is the Best Queer Comedy of the Year, and Wellesley College agrees!
    • Rio Romeo releases single “Over & Over”
      Rio Romeo releases single “Over & Over”
    • Dolly Parton confirms “Rock Star” collaborations
      Dolly Parton confirms “Rock Star” collaborations
  • Sports
    • Gauff and Richardson Shatter Expectations
      Gauff and Richardson Shatter Expectations
    • Student Athlete of the Month: Kennedy Mayo
      Student Athlete of the Month: Kennedy Mayo
    • No image
      What even is a BORG and why does it matter?
  • Multimedia
    • Photo of the Week
      Photo of the Week
    • “Stronger Together” Rally with Chelsea Clinton
      “Stronger Together” Rally with Chelsea Clinton
    • College Government Vice President 2016 End of the Year Report
      College Government Vice President 2016 End of the Year Report
    • Podcasts
    • The Wellesley Snooze
  • Projects
      • The News in Conversation
    • About
      • Contact
      • Join the News
      • Masthead
      • Editorial Board
    By Jacqueline Sanchez OpinionsMarch 6, 2019

    “Wellesley Uncensored Confessions” only serves to harm students

    In my first semester of college, the fall of 2015, I was a big user of Yik-Yak, an app that let participants read and post anonymous comments visible to people within a range of a few miles. The use of the app died down nationwide once it became unanonymous in my sophomore year, and has since shut down entirely. Nevertheless, the anonymity it provided people made it a very popular online platform for a few years.  

    When I first arrived at Wellesley, I was struck by the guarded and measured tones that many students spoke with, in and out of class. These were not negative traits to me, but very different from the mostly unthought-out flow of words that I was used to hearing from my high school peers. Thus, Yik-Yak appealed to me because, as I read people’s anonymous posts, I thought I was finally finding out what college was like “uncensored.”

    Now, in the spring semester of my senior year, another anonymous forum has become popular at Wellesley, and I cringe at the viewpoints I had as a younger student regarding Yik-Yak. Reading through the “Wellesley Uncensored Confessions” page on Facebook oftentimes leaves me feeling uncomfortable and frustrated, mostly because the platform’s anonymity lends itself to problematic posting by students confident that the comment will not be traced to them.

    Like Yik-Yak, many of the posts on the now quasi-infamous Facebook page are racist, misogynistic, transphobic and ableist. Because anyone in the world with access to Facebook can use “Wellesley Uncensored Confessions,” even outsiders of the Wellesley community can use the page to spread their hateful beliefs, all with the ease of not having their name attached to the post. For example, one particularly frightening incel posted about their hatred for women a few months ago, lamenting that women have “replaced God” in today’s society.

    Others use the page to attack students. One of two rules on the page is “Don’t call out individual people by name if [you’re] dragging them,” yet there have been many instances in which students have been called out on the page, if not by name, then by other traits that are easily identifiable such as their position within a organization. Many posts calling out individual students have not been removed, and it’s unclear what does warrant the removal of a post.

    People also use the page to talk about their mental health problems. They graphically discuss how terrible Wellesley makes them feel. These are the users that I am the most concerned about. Using an anonymous forum like “Wellesley Uncensored Confessions,” while giving people a place to vent their emotions, provides no concrete help, save that of any caring (yet for the most part unqualified) commenters who choose to reach out.

    Indeed, these types of comments reveal one of the biggest problems with the confessions page, which is that it overwhelmingly does nothing to help people. People reaching out with problems are not receiving the professional attention that they need. Furthermore, the confessions page in general is doing nothing to help improve the campus culture that it’s tearing down.

    Devotees to the page may argue that it is not meant to help people but to provide a platform for people to talk about Wellesley without being censored, and for those interested in reading about what life at Wellesley is like. Yet the page in no way accomplishes these aims, because it does not accurately give an entire picture of what life at Wellesley is like. Instead, it just reflects the worst of it.

    In my opinion, the confessions page should be disabled entirely. I believe that as long as people have such a freeform way to spread hate, they will eagerly use it. However, I know that this isn’t a realistic option as long as it has so many supporters.

    Instead, users who post on an anonymous page to share their views on race, class, gender and ableism should think about what they want anonymity for, and if they are intentionally spreading hostility to minority groups. People who genuinely have questions about these issues shouldn’t be afraid to attach their names to them.

    For people struggling with mental health who are afraid to come forward publicly, the Stone Center or Active Minds could create a separate anonymous forum, and provide informed responses so that those affected can get proper help.

    Above all, except when they feel unsafe, people should not turn to anonymity to express their views. Forums like “Wellesley Uncensored Confessions” should be abandoned in favor of outlets where participants are required to disclose their identity, in order to stop the spread of ignorance and hate at the college.

    Share on

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Google +
    • LinkedIn
    • Email
    Previous articleISIS bride controversy exposes continued British colonialism
    Next articleThomas Cushman Letter to the Editor

    You may also like

    France’s Abaya Ban Unveils Its Own Misogyny

    Editorial: In defense of affirmative action

    I am an NCAA champion: we should end college recruiting

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    The Wellesley News

      SECTIONS

    • News
    • Features
    • Opinions
    • Arts
    • Sports
    • Multimedia
    • Projects
    • About

      ABOUT

    • Contact
    • Join the News
    • Masthead
    • Editorial Board

      RESOURCES

    • Advertising
    • Submission
    • Subscribe

      CONTACT US

    • Contact
    COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS