• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
      Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
    • Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age
      Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age
    • Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation
      Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Controversial
      The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Controversial
    • Lucy Dacus Brings a Minimal Yet Powerful Performance to Northeastern University
      Lucy Dacus Brings a Minimal Yet Powerful Performance to Northeastern University
    • “Glass Onion” Takes Shots at Easy Targets
      “Glass Onion” Takes Shots at Easy Targets
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Rejected Snooze Articles for the Week
      Rejected Snooze Articles for the Week
    • Happy Valentine’s Day from Spog
      Happy Valentine’s Day from Spog
    • The Four Best Places to Loudly FaceTime Someone on Campus
      The Four Best Places to Loudly FaceTime Someone on Campus
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Jodi Wei OpinionsMarch 11, 2019

We must be critical of our candidates

Photo Courtesy of Wellesley College Government

Once again, Wellesley College finds itself in the midst of another College Government (CG) election. In the past week, you have been accosted with countless emails with aggressively friendly invitations for lunch chats, buzzwords about ‘experience’ and ‘commitment’ and maybe even a fun, quirky video about a candidate. How exhausting — both for candidates and us voters. That said, I do want to add a little more to your CG plate. In the next couple of days, I humbly ask that we voters take the same care, consideration and especially critical lens we bring to every other aspect of our lives to the crafted messages on which our peers are pinning their hopes of election.

This year is different, especially perhaps in comparison to the debacle of last year’s first election. At the time of this writing, no Elections Committee violations have been filed and no one campaign is drawing any sort of unwanted attention. That, however, does not mean we can afford complacency in this election cycle. It means that not only must we be more critical, but we must also be more vocal in our criticisms, reflecting more comprehensively on each candidate’s past, as we can only surmise from their campaign materials what will happen in the future.

During my time at Wellesley, I’ve noticed a reticence when discussing contrarian views. Rather than confront the source of the issue, we resort to anonymous forums and private murmurs to express our displeasure about everything both occasionally and systematically wrong with and at Wellesley. CG and its elections are not absolved of this problem and all of its myriad implications. In fact, perhaps it is during the election cycle in which it is at its worst. We take at face value the lovely promises our campaigners write, regardless of if we know them and their history. This is dangerously complacent, and we must break that tradition this year.

As this year we are voting for the first CG cabinet that will be paid, it is especially crucial to hold our candidates to a much harsher light, and even more so important to talk to the candidates along with the Wellesley community about our concerns. Last year’s first round, for the spectacle that it was, represented an aspect of student government campaigning atypical at Wellesley, wherein students discussed not just the good candidates could bring, but also, more importantly, where candidates substantially lacked as a representative of the student body.

We must move away from considering CG candidates as merely students. The decision to run must come with every good, bad and ugly thing that we expect to see in election cycles, maybe perhaps not to the same extent as national elections, just a lighter Wellesley version of it. Even so, as public figures soliciting your votes, these candidates should be subject to a firm and fair evaluation in all sense of the word, including criticisms of their history, actions and especially character.

This is perhaps high hopes to motivate adequate due diligence to this campaign on a community of tired, overburdened college students. High hopes especially to implore you to engage in possibly uncomfortable conversations about a candidate’s questionable qualifications or past behavior. But the very least we voters can do is, shockingly, vote. Voter turnout from last year’s elections, including for special elections, was less than 50 percent of total eligible voters. It is impossible to elect a CG cabinet that we view as properly representative of the community’s desires if only a mere fraction of the community expresses their opinion.

To claim to be the best representative of their peers, especially in positions that will have direct impact on our lives, is a lofty assertion. It is our job as voters to discuss amongst ourselves who truly deserves a seat on the cabinet and the soon enacted salary figures. Before you vote, think about who you want in those positions. Think, for example, which CG President candidate would act as the best liaison between the student body and the administration? Which Chief Justice candidate has the best in mind for students facing the Honor Code Council?

Long emails with as-of-now empty promises does not give students the best idea of who they want in their cabinet. Criticism and questioning does. As our candidates work to gain our votes, we must ensure that our endorsements and votes are not as easy to come by as in past elections. I write this as someone distinctly critical of CG, and as someone whose experience on The Wellesley News has led me to cross paths professionally with many of the candidates prior to their campaigning. I’ve got a pretty clear idea of who I want in my cabinet, and you should too. Above all else, remember that your vote overwhelmingly counts. So don’t ignore that ballot when it graces your inbox next Tuesday.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleThe Sanders presidential campaign is just different enough to work
Next articleWhat is the future of American Privacy? Ask yourself.

You may also like

Logos of social media apps such as Twitter, Tiktok, Netflix, Spotify, and Discord.

Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity

Abstract painting of various boxes meant to imply computer and phone screens

Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age

A collection of a wide variety of foods in the colors of the rainbow

Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

  • Logos of social media apps such as Twitter, Tiktok, Netflix, Spotify, and Discord. Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
  • Stone-Davis dining staff report mistreatment
  • The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Contro...
  • A collection of a wide variety of foods in the colors of the rainbow Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflat...
  • Red envelope that contains money to celebrate the Lunar New Year. America’s cultural appropriation is a modern form of i...

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top