• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • First-Year Students Reflect on Their Expectations for College, One Semester In
      First-Year Students Reflect on Their Expectations for College, One Semester In
    • “We Want to Fundamentally Change the Culture,” International Student Union says
      “We Want to Fundamentally Change the Culture,” International Student Union says
    • No image
      Students Reflect on Spring 2021 Move-in
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • The block system is a joke
      The block system is a joke
    • Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
      Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • Harry Styles de-typifies masculinity in Vogue’s December Issue, but is this enough? (spoiler: it’s not)
      Harry Styles de-typifies masculinity in Vogue’s December Issue, but is this enough? (spoiler: it’s not)
    • Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
      Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
    • Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
      Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • No image
      Maintaining wellness as the cold sets in
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Jodi Wei, Mary Meisenzahl OpinionsApril 3, 2019

Wellesley isn’t immune to elitism

Photo Courtesy of Hollywood Reporter

Ever since last month’s uncovering of the now infamous elite college admissions cheating scheme, renewed focus on the extreme means to which many parents resort to for the sake of their children has sparked a painful and frustrating conversation about wealth in society. Wellesley was not one of the colleges involved in the scandal, so we have mostly escaped nationwide scrutiny. Yet, we should take this opportunity to look at how wealth and privilege factor into the Wellesley community.

There are many ways to ‘buy’ your way into a college like Wellesley that don’t involve millions in cash wired to a phony charity bank account. However,  there are thousands of other desperate parents all over the world ready to sacrifice everything for their children’s success. Our parents may not have been charged in a federal sting operation, but every check that was cashed by a private tutor, admissions counselor or boarding school with their names signed on the dotted line is a complicit reminder that access to an elite secondary education is really only meant for the wealthy.

Without a doubt, many parents, as a show of love and caring, will go to extreme lengths for their child’s success with very few questions asked. An environment of competitiveness — between the students and also amongst the parents — creates an overwhelming pressure for parents to provide their kids with the most expensive tutor, the most expensive instrument, a spot on the most expensive club sports team. And in turn, kids feel they need these advantages from their parents for guaranteed success. We –– the kids –– spend our formative years not playing or leaning into our natural curiosity, but rather crafting and living a college-ready resume, stacking all of our commodifiable experiences and skills onto a single sheet of paper to present to an apathetic admissions counselor — who, might we remind you — could just as easily turn their head towards a $1.2 million bribe.

Despite efforts to welcome first-generation and low-income students, Wellesley is not always accessible to students who don’t come from elite backgrounds, with parents or siblings who can help them navigate all the unspoken rules of the elite private New England institutions, such as Wellesley. Indeed, for all of the College’s goodwill towards its first-generation and low-income student population, both implicit and explicit barriers prevail as a result of administrative policy and the elite secondary education system as it currently stands.

We admit that we are not exempt. This editorial staff is comprised of members who had an advantage in the current admissions process, and we must acknowledge how we have benefitted from the current college admissions system, just as you, the reader, likely did as well.  So before you accuse us of attacking the student body, let us remind you that what’s done is done. We cannot go backwards in time and rip up the check for the SAT bootcamp you endured in tenth grade. But we can, going forward, recognize and educate the families in our communities that every dollar spent on these college admissions prep schemes is a complicit agreement that wealth, above anything else, breaks barriers. Not, as we are conditioned to believe, intelligence, acumen, curiosity, passion, determination, grit or the other buzzwords we’re told to include in our Common App essays.

We can take the lessons of the college admissions scandal and do two things with them. We can continue to provide the demand for elite college services such as the ones from which many of us benefited, or we can recognize and work to dismantle the environment that allows the wealthy to succeed over even the most deserving individuals. So, for all of our sakes, if you’re in a position to help others — do it.

 

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleCosta Rica’s Green Deal is a stride towards environmental revolution
Next articleUsing procards to fund organizations is an important step in the right direction

You may also like

A piece of pizza missing topings.

Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?

The block system is a joke

Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls

1 Comment

  • Gianni says:
    April 6, 2019 at 1:57 PM

    Thank you for your article. I would like to point out that there are many families who worl really hard and who also came from humble backgrounds that have sent their kids to elite schools and that pay for tutors. It’s also a choice in life on how one spends one’s income. This article is not accurate as it doesn’t take into account what I just wrote. Kind regards and good luck.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

  • First-Year Students Reflect on Their Expectations for Colleg...
  • Students Reflect on Spring 2021 Move-in
  • “We Want to Fundamentally Change the Culture,” International...
  • Harry Styles de-typifies masculinity in Vogue’s December Iss...

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top