• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
      Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
    • It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
      It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
    • What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
      What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • No image
      Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy
    • No image
      Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand
    • Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
      Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
      Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
    • Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
      Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
    • The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
      The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Shannon Dennehy OpinionsApril 25, 2019

Renewing the call to divest from fossil fuel companies

Photo Courtesy of SolarSurge

In the fall of 2014, student activists petitioned the College to begin the process of completely divesting from fossil fuel companies. A working group formed by the Board of Trustees met with students and examined the issue, specifically addressing the question of how divestment would affect the endowment. That spring, President Kim Bottomly responded by saying that “the (Board of Trustees) and I, do not support the idea of using the College’s endowment as a lever for social change … the cost to Wellesley would be high and the economic impact on fossil fuels companies inconsequential.”  

However, I argue that continuing to invest in fossil fuel companies also sends a message, though it is one of social stagnation, rather than change. And that message says that Wellesley College is unconcerned with the realities and consequences of the fossil fuel industry. It says that when Wellesley encourages students and departments to become more sustainable, it’s simply a pretense, for when presented with the opportunity to take a bigger step, Wellesley would rather stay in line. There are stickers in our bathrooms, for example, reminding us to turn off running water or switch off the lights — which are obviously good measures — but they are not enough. Their initiative says that Wellesley would rather bolster its financial success and stability with companies and practices that are destroying the environment and altering the world as we know it. It says that at the end of the day, Wellesley is content with gazing inward instead of seeking to help our community and planet.

This semester has seen EnAct and Renew Wellesley make efforts to spark conversation and action regarding sustainability and renewable energy. And their efforts are admirable. However, if Wellesley is to truly make a difference, it must make that political statement President Bottomly and the Board of Trustees were so hesitant to make and divest. I’m not naive; one institution divesting from fossil fuel companies won’t have a huge immediate impact. But Wellesley would not be the only institution. Universities, local governments, churches and more have started divesting. As a result of the tireless work of activists, city councils and companies around the world are beginning to take action. What is keeping Wellesley from doing the same? While the Office of Investments didn’t respond to my email asking for their input, I can imagine the reason is simple: money.

It isn’t as if Wellesley doesn’t understand the threat that climate change poses. Wellesley College isn’t primarily composed of climate change skeptics, so our funding should reflect that. Climate change has recently become a recurring topic in the news with many other organizations and governments taking a more radical stance on the issue. The Costa Rican government, for example, vowed to end the country’s dependence on fossil fuels by 2050. If a country can do it, why is it so difficult for Wellesley College to follow suit?

Five years later it is well past the time for Wellesley to reconsider that decision. Like it or not, Wellesley College is a political institution — how could a college created for and devoted to the education of women not be? Its very essence is the fabric of social change. Perhaps a new administration can finally set Wellesley down the right path.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous article“Anti-mormon” attitudes show contradictions in commitment to Wellesley’s values
Next articleWellesley’s emphasis on internships is damaging to student morale and campus culture

You may also like

Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification

It’s time to put traditional grading to the test

Banner reading this website has been seized over images of a book shelf

What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top