• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
      Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
    • Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
      Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
    • Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health
      Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • The block system is a joke
      The block system is a joke
    • Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
      Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
      Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
    • Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
      Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
    • “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
      “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • No image
      Maintaining wellness as the cold sets in
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Leanne Shen OpinionsNovember 12, 2019

Reformation’s Performance of Activism

At the end of Sept. 2019, Forever 21 filed for bankruptcy.

Some analysts believe that Forever 21’s bankruptcy filing is indicative of a shift in consumers’ tastes and preferences — one that veers away from the follies of fast fashion — but there’s reason to believe that the industry is doing just fine. Fast fashion refers to mass-produced clothes based on current trends, generating tons of waste and low-quality items. Examples of fast fashion brands include a mix of storefront and online warehouses: ZARA, SHEIN and Missguided, to name a few.

Fast fashion has come under increasing scrutiny for its role as one of the biggest contributors to environmental degradation. As evidence of the environmental toll of fast fashion gains traction, so does the trend of brands willing to capitalize on a shift in consumer interest towards ethical shopping.

In comes Reformation: too good to be true? Spoiler alert — it is. The popular brand checks off all the boxes for a fashionable and environmentally minded consumer: minimal, sleek, casually glamorous and outspokenly environmentally responsible. Unfortunately, if buying high-waisted mini skirts for $98 is within the bounds of what’s reasonable, choosing the environmentally conscious option is incredibly inaccessible — especially when exact replicas of Reformation’s items are sold on SHEIN’s website for $13. Is this the true cost of sustainability? There are certainly people in the world who see $98 as a normal cost for a clothing basic — but does that mean only those people are morally absolved to be sustainable?

 Clare O’Connor for Forbes reports:  “The prices [of Reformation] — $158 for a stretch jersey maxi dress and $58 for a ribbed off-the-shoulder top — aren’t far off what you might find at less scrupulous chains with manufacturing facilities in places like Bangladesh.” O’Connor’s tone and treatment represent something that’s infected contemporary American marketing: the conflation of moral superiority and classism.

While Reformation’s environmental reputation may be sparkling, their marketing campaign pushing their image is not. It seems as if they’re doing everything they can to make sure the first word that comes to mind when thinking of Reformation is sustainability. The brand’s blog posts attempt to make environmental activism chic, leaving a sour taste in the mouths of consumers. “Carbon is canceled,” one cheery heading on Reformation’s sustainability report reads, stealing slang from social media. The brand uses what they call “sexy math” to calculate the environmental resources they’ve saved. Their tone seems too contrived, too performative — it’s clear that the brand treats environmental preservation as a profitable trend. 

At the end of the day, Reformation is a company that, like all others, is in the market to make a profit. But they’ve found a way to bridge social media activism and capitalism to market to their ideal consumer, who believes that $150 dresses and $60 tops are comparable to prices found in notably less ethical — albeit cheaper — brands. And if that’s out of your price range, that’s fine; they’ll just try their best to guilt you into splurging anyway. 

Take their slogan for example: “Being naked is the #1 most sustainable option. We’re #2.” Despite what this slogan claims, Reformation is still producing new clothes — inevitably creating  waste. Buying clothes from stores other than Reformation will not immediately send you to climate change hell, just like buying clothes from them doesn’t make you the Greta Thunberg of your friends.

For a company that proclaims to be so dedicated to the cause of sustainability, Reformation doesn’t seem to offer many ways for consumers to get involved with environmentalism that don’t involve a pricetag. There is, of course, the “Ref Guide To Sustainable Travel.” If you’re looking for a four-star hotel and you’ve got over $800 to blow, it’s the perfect guide for you. The guide is short and not very informative and more about connecting customers with environmentally conscious products, rather than encouraging them to change their habits. 

Reformation has combined classism and moral superiority to create a contemporary culture of elitism about shoppers’ habits. They don’t advertise themselves as a luxury brand, even if their prices reflect otherwise. If you aren’t part of the inside circle — the one that can afford basics in the three figure mark — then according to Reformation, there’s not much else you can do to maintain a sustainable lifestyle. It seems like the only kind of environmental preservation that Reformation values is the kind you have to pay for.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleBig corporations don’t care about the little guy, and they never will
Next articleLetter to the Editor: RE: We need to pay attention: Wellesley is failing its students with ADHD

You may also like

A piece of pizza missing topings.

Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?

The block system is a joke

Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top