• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
      Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
    • Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
      Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
    • Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health
      Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • The block system is a joke
      The block system is a joke
    • Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
      Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
      Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
    • Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
      Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
    • “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
      “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • No image
      Maintaining wellness as the cold sets in
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Deeksha Udupa, Samantha Churchill OpinionsNovember 20, 2019

Northwestern in the national limelight: the role of consent and ethics in journalism

Photo Courtesy of Chris Sweda / Chicago Tribune

Overview of the Events

On Nov. 5 former Attorney General Jeff Sessions spoke at Northwestern University, and students staged a protest. The Daily Northwestern sent a photographer and two reporters: one to cover the protest and one to cover the talk itself. The newspaper obtained some protestors’ phone numbers from the student directory and requested interviews through text. They also ran pictures of student protestors.

Following an outcry from the student body, the Daily issued an apology for the way they covered this event and their role in contributing to “the harm students experienced.” This apology in turn was criticized by some members of professional publications on the count that it apologized for good journalistic practices.

The two sides of integrity

Sam Churchill ’20

According to journalism ethics and the law, media outlets — student newspapers included — have the right to take and print photos of any person in a public space. Consent is not required for a photo’s publication. Therefore, it is unreasonable for students at Northwestern University to demand that their school’s media extend them a unique order of privacy when protests by their very nature are public events. Although publishing these photos was technically legal and students should not feel entitled to privacy in the public sphere, I do not agree with the Daily Northwestern’s decision to run the photos. While the primary goal of student reporting should be a fair and accurate representation of the facts, it is the responsibility of each editorial board to carefully weigh this duty against the potential harm their coverage can cause.

In this case, I do not believe that photos of the protesters would have enhanced readers’ understanding of the events beyond the coverage the article provided. In order to do their part in creating a safe environment for the expression of dissenting opinions, the Daily could have instead chosen to ask protestors for their consent to publish the photographs. In either case, this is a decision that should have been carefully considered before publication. It should not take public outcry for journalists to consider their editorial responsibilities.

However, I am disappointed in the Daily Northwestern for their unnecessary public apology for contacting protestors. Members of the publication used the student directory to obtain phone numbers and request interviews. Applying the same principle of aiming to balance robust journalism with potentially harmful effects, the substantive value of gaining insight through interviews outweighs the discomfort some students felt as a result of contact. It is a journalist’s job to put together the most complete picture possible, particularly in relation to events of gravity, like Northwestern’s protests. Though mentioning the event may have caused distress to some, students who did not wish to discuss the protest had the option to decline the interview request. The threshold for potential harm outweighing journalistic responsibility is certainly somewhere between not requesting interviews at all and harassing someone for contact; again, how hard a journalist should push is a highly subjective benchmark that should be adjusted based on circumstance. In this case, I believe the cutoff lies well north of simply contacting a source. If students are uncomfortable with fellow students having access to their phone numbers, that is an issue that should be taken up with the administration; it is unreasonable to ask the paper not to use a resource that is readily available to all students in order to make a one-off request for information pertaining to a salient campus issue.

Ethical standards for student journalists should be inherently different from those of the professional media. However, I do believe that editorial responsibility in both instances expands beyond the minimum standards the law requires. Balancing robust journalism with the potential harm reporting can cause is an extremely complex task. In evaluating this balance, journalists must critically consider the power differentials and injustices often wrapped up in the stories we report. There is no one correct answer for everyone, and even if there were, no publication could strike that balance perfectly every time. Student journalists should aspire to reach that balance, regardless of its likelihood. When journalists inevitably fall short, we should be criticized for it. And when we are criticized, we will work to become better.

Precedent is not always the answer

Deeksha Udupa ’22

Young journalists are often forced to choose between opportunities and ethics, and I believe that with the coverage of this protest, the Daily Northwestern gave preference to the former. Rather than asking student protesters if they would be comfortable with permanently uploading the photographs online, the Daily acted out of self-interest; these student journalists were aware of the virality of both Sessions’ visit and the consequent protest and, in my opinion, hoped to take advantage of both to propel their own careers.

It is true that, according to journalism ethics and law, student newspapers do have the right to take and print photos of anyone in a public space. I don’t believe that this can be implemented as a “blanket rule” because it ignores situational context. According to a current Northwestern student, Northwestern University has previously punished protesters and has identified them through published photographs. Furthermore, a similar incident occurred after students protested an event by a public relations official of the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Northwestern has a pattern of penalizing dissenters and using published photographs as evidence.

The journalists at the Daily should have been more mindful not only of their actions, but also of their subsequent effects. The publishing of these photographs disproportionately affected first-generation students, low-income students and students of color, specifically women of color, because most activists at Northwestern identify with these groups, according to a current Northwestern student who spoke to The Wellesley News. Students who identify with these groups already deal with the difficulties of navigating college and predominantly white spaces, and shouldn’t also have to worry about facing punishment at the hands of the administration for exercising their freedom of speech.

The question is not if they had the right to publish these photos — rather, it is whether they should have done so. I am not denying that these journalists did follow precedent. However, I believe that journalists must not always turn to precedent so quickly because what worked in the past is not always the best option for the present. We live in a society where the voices of dissent are not just dismissed, but also endangered. Student journalists should not take part in the system of muting these voices. The Daily Northwestern is not just read by students, but also administrative officials, and its journalists need to be aware of their full readership. If a sensitive topic is to be covered, it should be done so ethically, so that those who are already in the minority are not further marginalized.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleEncountering unpredictability in your career: an alumna’s perspective
Next articleWe must reconsider our relationship with online anonymity

You may also like

A piece of pizza missing topings.

Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?

The block system is a joke

Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls

1 Comment

  • Man with the Axe says:
    December 4, 2019 at 9:50 AM

    The complaining students decided to go to the Jeff Sessions event to see if they could bully the attendees and organizers to cancel the event. In the process, they were photographed. So they tried to bully the student journalists into withdrawing the photos. And why? Because they might have to pay a price for violating university policy and they don’t want to do that. They are poster children for the concept of crybullies. They should be sentenced to read “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” so that they might better understand the ethics of breaking the rules to make a point. Namely, you have to take the punishment or you are just a law-breaker and not a real activist.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Man with the Axe Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top