• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
      Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
    • It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
      It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
    • What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
      What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • No image
      Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy
    • No image
      Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand
    • Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
      Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
      Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
    • Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
      Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
    • The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
      The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Sri Mylavarapu Arts, ReviewsNovember 20, 2019

“The King”: A mediocre retelling of a Shakespearean classic

Photo Courtesy of Netflix

A Shakespeare adaptation has once again hit our screens, and this time the one and only Timothée Chalamet is leading the pack. “The King,” directed by David Michôd, is the newest adaptation of Shakespeare’s “Henriad” plays and the first to be created entirely by Netflix. The movie remains faithful enough to the beloved plays. However, the movie fails to incorporate some of the most memorable lines from the “Henriad.” For Shakespeare enthusiasts, this adaptation may fall short in terms of dialogue when compared to other adaptations. Still, Michôd’s “The King” isn’t a direct translation of the original plays nor does it try to be. 

The movie’s real strong suit is the power of its cast. Timothée Chalamet, unsurprisingly, is absolutely captivating. It’s not hard for the audience to picture Chalamet as a young, boyish King Henry suddenly thrust into power after the death of his father and brother. Chalamet’s performance stands out in a movie that is at times terribly dull, proving that he is truly deserving of his cult like fan following. Robert Pattinson plays the Dauphin, a mad ruler who seemingly does everything in his power to taunt the immature King Henry. Pattinson’s French accent is outrageous, to say the least, but his presence on screen is suited for his character, who provides comic relief in a movie that takes itself too seriously. King Henry’s sidekick, Falstaff, is portrayed by none other than Joel Edgerton. Edgerton does an amazing job at giving Falstaff depth as well as personality. However, the film’s take on Falstaff pales in comparison to Shakespeare’s iconic character. Lily-Rose Depp plays Catherine of Valois, the soon to be wife of King Henry. Although Depp’s screen time is short, she is convincing in her role and her character serves as a nice contrast to Chalamet’s. In one of the best scenes of the movie, Catherine of Valois questions King Henry’s foolish, egotistical motivations for war. Scenes like this actually give the film a unique, modern perspective compared to previous adaptations. However, the film only briefly explores the concept of toxic masculinity that is all too present in these types of stories. Despite strong performances from the cast, the overall film is dull. The dialogue is forgettable and some of the scenes feel empty. Though shot beautifully, the cinematography does not distract from the fact that we have all seen this movie a hundred times. We are in an age where almost every period piece has been done before, and “The King” fails to use its young cast to tell an old story in a new way. 

Films like “The King” suggest that Netflix is slowly beginning to push the limits for its originals. Alfonso Cuaron’s period drama, “Roma” proved that Netflix is capable of creating critically acclaimed films. Like “Roma,” “The King” had a limited theatrical release before streaming on Netflix. With the critical success of their other originals, Netflix has now established itself as a highly regarded studio. However, some members of the film industry are reluctant to let Netflix originals compete in the same category as traditional films. Recently, director Steven Spielberg has been critical of The Academy’s decision to allow streaming services to be nominated for Academy Awards. However, it looks like many highly regarded actors are eager to participate in movies produced by streaming services. “The King” boasts a star-studded cast that includes the likes of Academy Award nominee Timothée Chalamet and Golden Globe nominee Joel Edgerton. This prompts the broader question of audience turnout. For films like “The King” that attract a more niche audience, will viewers even think it’s worth seeing in theaters if streaming services will offer the movies so soon after? Audiences only go to movie theaters to see non-blockbuster, award contender films if they feel like the movie is worth it. If streaming services start offering more reputable films for mass consumption, will it lessen the credibility of the films in the eyes of industry elites? Right now, all we know is that streaming services are on the rise and with movie theater attendance hitting all time lows, it’s safe to say that films like “The King” may succeed in becoming small screen spectacles.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleLast Christmas falls flat as a holiday rom-com
Next articleMuch Ado About Shakes House: Biannual production is a rousing success

You may also like

Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy

Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand

Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top