facebook icon facebook icon facebook icon
  • About
  • ADS
  • Masthead
    • Editorial Board
  • Submission
  • Subscribe
The Wellesley News -
  • News
    • Contract ratified by Wellesley’s Maintenance and Service Employees Union
      Contract ratified by Wellesley’s Maintenance and Service Employees Union
    • News in Brief
      News in Brief
    • Wellesley adapts to end of race conscious admissions
      Wellesley adapts to end of race conscious admissions
    • Senate Report
    • News in Brief
  • Features
    • Professor Spotlight: Dr. Faisal Ahmed
      Professor Spotlight: Dr. Faisal Ahmed
    • Spotlight: New Professor Kathryn Winner
      Spotlight: New Professor Kathryn Winner
    • Spotlight: New Professor Lucia Nhamo ’11
      Spotlight: New Professor Lucia Nhamo ’11
    • Humans of Wellesley
    • Archives
  • Opinions
    • France’s Abaya Ban Unveils Its Own Misogyny
      France’s Abaya Ban Unveils Its Own Misogyny
    • Editorial: In defense of affirmative action
      Editorial: In defense of affirmative action
    • I am an NCAA champion: we should end college recruiting
      I am an NCAA champion: we should end college recruiting
    • Editorials
    • Letters to Editors
  • Arts
    • The SAG-AFTRA and WGA Strikes: What’s happening in Hollywood?
      The SAG-AFTRA and WGA Strikes: What’s happening in Hollywood?
    • Digging into Hozier’s Unreal Unearth: “De Selby (Part 1)” and the Population of Loss
      Digging into Hozier’s Unreal Unearth: “De Selby (Part 1)” and the Population of Loss
    • Summer Releases to Help Usher in Fall
      Summer Releases to Help Usher in Fall
  • Sports
    • Gauff and Richardson Shatter Expectations
      Gauff and Richardson Shatter Expectations
    • Student Athlete of the Month: Kennedy Mayo
      Student Athlete of the Month: Kennedy Mayo
    • No image
      What even is a BORG and why does it matter?
  • Multimedia
    • Photo of the Week
      Photo of the Week
    • “Stronger Together” Rally with Chelsea Clinton
      “Stronger Together” Rally with Chelsea Clinton
    • College Government Vice President 2016 End of the Year Report
      College Government Vice President 2016 End of the Year Report
    • Podcasts
    • The Wellesley Snooze
  • Projects
      • The News in Conversation
    • About
      • Contact
      • Join the News
      • Masthead
      • Editorial Board
    By Kristen Elizabeth Gasparini OpinionsMarch 4, 2020

    Who’s afraid of the word “conspiracy”?

    Conspiracy theories — quickly dismissed in public conversation — are a touchy subject. Engaging with conspiracy theorists only serves to promote their ideas, which can have harmful consequences on society. For example, arguing that vaccines are harmful causes the measles to spread, continuing to question climate change leads to fatal inaction and rejecting the trustworthiness of media and governments turns politics into a circus. So should we dismiss these views as well as the people who hold them?

    Before answering, let us grasp the difference between “conspiracies” and “conspiracy theories.” The first are crimes punishable by law. Think of the Tuskegee experiments,  MK Ultra or of the Iran Contra scandal. Conspiracies occur when two or more people secretly agree to commit illegal acts in order to achieve some goal. Successful conspiracies involve some amount of deception and cover up, since conspirators obviously do not want to be discovered. Conspiracy theories, instead, are the reason why any conspiracy is brought to justice. Conspiracy theorists are people who suspect that a conspiracy has occurred, investigate aspects of the plot and the cover up, and bring their findings or “theories” to the public’s attention.

    Investigative journalists like Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward, who brought the Watergate conspiracy to light in 1972, are professional conspiracy theorists: without people like them, masterfully hidden abuses of power would go unchecked. This is why philosopher David Coady thinks we should not dismiss conspiracy theories and theorists. He encourages us to reflect on their societal function, rather than stigmatize them. Investigating whether conspiracies occur is an important endeavor, but, unfortunately, we cannot always rely on institutional investigators and mainstream news agencies to tell us what is really going on, because they are often part and parcel of efforts to deceive people.

    Consider the reporting of Saddam Hussein’s elusive Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs). Major media outlets worldwide lied in unison about the existence of WMDs in Iraq in order to steer public opinion in favor of the 2003 invasion. Reporters who fought against these lies were largely ignored. It was as early as 1977 that Bernstein reported on how the relationship between hundreds of US journalists and the CIA had and would continue to have an effect on mass opinion. Unfortunately, most people seem to not have paid considerable attention to his effort, and as we have seen, the consequences are lethal. Coady uses the term “coincidence theorists” to refer to those among us who are excessively unwilling to analyze evidence and connect the dots of a contested story: by doing so, they make it easier for criminals to escape justice.

    Coincidence theorists, then, can also cause harm to society. Blindly agreeing with mainstream media and institutions who are often both untrustworthy and crippled by conflicts of interest such as corporate funding, military and political pressures, only weaken democratic inquiry. “Coincidence theorizing” arguably makes it more likely that more conspiracies will occur because culprits expect to be scrutinized less and less. Therefore, we must engage in depth with other viewpoints, as improbable as they sound, and beware of the times when authoritative mouthpieces discourage us from doing so. The discrediting of dissenters, after all, should be an expected cover up tactic.

    The harmful effects of incorrect beliefs — the spread of diseases, climate change inaction, political nihilism — should be blamed first and foremost on an environment of stifled public dialogue and corrupted information systems, rather than on individuals whose mistrust in authorities is often legitimate, and who try their best to understand the truth by other means. It is up to each and every one of us to transform that unhealthy environment. First, by not stigmatizing conspiracy theorists. Second, by advocating for widespread, structured conspiracy discourse. Third, by listening deeply, and letting the truth emerge from practicing respectful, receptive, rigorous disagreement.

    Share on

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Google +
    • LinkedIn
    • Email
    Previous articleEnduring senior spring with financial insecurity
    Next articleThe role of language in mainstream media: principles of exclusion

    You may also like

    France’s Abaya Ban Unveils Its Own Misogyny

    Editorial: In defense of affirmative action

    I am an NCAA champion: we should end college recruiting

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    The Wellesley News

      SECTIONS

    • News
    • Features
    • Opinions
    • Arts
    • Sports
    • Multimedia
    • Projects
    • About

      ABOUT

    • Contact
    • Join the News
    • Masthead
    • Editorial Board

      RESOURCES

    • Advertising
    • Submission
    • Subscribe

      CONTACT US

    • Contact
    COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS