facebook icon facebook icon facebook icon
  • About
  • ADS
  • Masthead
    • Editorial Board
  • Submission
  • Subscribe
The Wellesley News -
  • News
    • Contract ratified by Wellesley’s Maintenance and Service Employees Union
      Contract ratified by Wellesley’s Maintenance and Service Employees Union
    • News in Brief
      News in Brief
    • Wellesley adapts to end of race conscious admissions
      Wellesley adapts to end of race conscious admissions
    • Senate Report
    • News in Brief
  • Features
    • Professor Spotlight: Dr. Faisal Ahmed
      Professor Spotlight: Dr. Faisal Ahmed
    • Spotlight: New Professor Kathryn Winner
      Spotlight: New Professor Kathryn Winner
    • Spotlight: New Professor Lucia Nhamo ’11
      Spotlight: New Professor Lucia Nhamo ’11
    • Humans of Wellesley
    • Archives
  • Opinions
    • France’s Abaya Ban Unveils Its Own Misogyny
      France’s Abaya Ban Unveils Its Own Misogyny
    • Editorial: In defense of affirmative action
      Editorial: In defense of affirmative action
    • I am an NCAA champion: we should end college recruiting
      I am an NCAA champion: we should end college recruiting
    • Editorials
    • Letters to Editors
  • Arts
    • The SAG-AFTRA and WGA Strikes: What’s happening in Hollywood?
      The SAG-AFTRA and WGA Strikes: What’s happening in Hollywood?
    • Digging into Hozier’s Unreal Unearth: “De Selby (Part 1)” and the Population of Loss
      Digging into Hozier’s Unreal Unearth: “De Selby (Part 1)” and the Population of Loss
    • Summer Releases to Help Usher in Fall
      Summer Releases to Help Usher in Fall
  • Sports
    • Gauff and Richardson Shatter Expectations
      Gauff and Richardson Shatter Expectations
    • Student Athlete of the Month: Kennedy Mayo
      Student Athlete of the Month: Kennedy Mayo
    • No image
      What even is a BORG and why does it matter?
  • Multimedia
    • Photo of the Week
      Photo of the Week
    • “Stronger Together” Rally with Chelsea Clinton
      “Stronger Together” Rally with Chelsea Clinton
    • College Government Vice President 2016 End of the Year Report
      College Government Vice President 2016 End of the Year Report
    • Podcasts
    • The Wellesley Snooze
  • Projects
      • The News in Conversation
    • About
      • Contact
      • Join the News
      • Masthead
      • Editorial Board
    By Katharine Tracy Arts, ReviewsMarch 5, 2020

    Emma offers a new perspective on Austen’s most unlikable heroine

    When setting out to write “Emma,” Jane Austen hoped to craft “a heroine whom no one but myself will much like.” In the novel’s opening sentence, Emma Woodhouse is described as “handsome, clever, and rich,” something that distinguishes her from typical Austen favorites like Elizabeth Bennet from “Pride and Prejudice” or Elinor Dashwood from “Sense and Sensibility”. Autumn de Wilde’s newest adaptation of Austen’s novel doesn’t shy away from that characterization either; the film’s promotional material paints this three word tagline across 2020’s answer to Emma Woodhouse, horror movie ingenue Anya Taylor-Joy. With the already exhausting amount of Austen-adjacent-adaptations in mind, do we really need another “Emma” adaptation?

    After seeing de Wilde’s adaptation, my answer is a resounding “yes.” My feeling’s pre- and post- 2020’s “Emma.”, remind me of my feelings toward another retelling of a beloved literary classic: Greta Gerwig’s “Little Women.” Both films comfortably navigate the eccentricities of the 19th century and sketch a tangible portrait compatible with 21st century sensibilities. While Gerwig’s changes are more structural and social-minded, screenwriter Eleanor Catton’s changes are mostly tonal, not altering much of the story from Austen’s original novel.
    “Emma.” follows the exploits of hapless matchmaker Emma Woodhouse. Emma, largely too impressed with herself, feels she will never find a man of her worth. She instead strives to improve her peers. Her newest project is Harriet Smith (played by Mia Goth), an orphan. While Harriet’s true affections lie with a lowly farmer, Emma pushes her to fall for the snobby vicar, Mr. Elton, played by a hilariously detestable Josh O’Connor. In this portion of the film, absurd, stilted comedy, silly costumes and symmetric, colorful cinematography — think Wes Anderson meets Regency Era England — run rampant. Taylor-Joy is cruel and cold, so much so, I’d have trouble believing if even Jane Austen would much like her.

    Though delightful at times, this style over substance approach worried me. The film almost began to feel like the essence of “Emma.,” offering nothing thematically interesting. However, de Wilde’s film takes a stunning turn after Emma makes a snide comment about the socially inept Miss Bates toward her brother-in-law and eventual dark horse romantic contender, Mr. Knightley, whose brooding depiction by Johnny Flynn is a welcomed departure from the character’s overly bookish and scrupulous past. Emma’s reflection and relationship with Mr. Knightley are reminiscent of Joe Wright’s 2005 “Pride and Prejudice.” It’s steeped in romanticism and yearning, but our love interests are too persnickety to realize. It’s also worth noting that Taylor-Joy no longer possesses her first act haughtiness, but instead a more complete and humble Emma emerges.

    Usually, making sense of Austen’s novel requires an almost encyclopedic memory of the dozens of Misters and Misses who waltz in and out of the plot. Catton is less concerned with these figures and devotes more time to developing Harriet and Emma’s friendship, including a stand-out scene in which Emma helps Harriet prepare for a ball. In addition, less time is devoted to Emma’s later experiences with Mr. Knightley, providing a delicious tension and believability to the latter’s affection toward Emma. Catton is also wise to inject something too frequently absent from Austen retellings: her humor. In the frills of period piece austerity, Austen adaptations can quickly lose the liveliness that serves as a backdrop to her wisdom. Catton never forgets to find the humor in things as minor as an inopportune nosebleed.

    In a world where BBC mini-series and late 90s teen movie retellings of classic literature seem to dominate the zeitgeist’s perception of all things Austen, de Wilde’s revisionist stab at “Emma” is shockingly refreshing. If you love the comedic melodrama and romantic release of “Clueless,” maybe give “Emma.” a try, too.

    Share on

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Google +
    • LinkedIn
    • Email
    Previous articleBob Iger Steps Down as CEO of Disney: A Look into the Company’s Past and Future
    Next articleSecret Sisters come into their own with mesmerizing album “Saturn Return”

    You may also like

    The SAG-AFTRA and WGA Strikes: What’s happening in Hollywood?

    Digging into Hozier’s Unreal Unearth: “De Selby (Part 1)” and the Population of Loss

    Summer Releases to Help Usher in Fall

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    The Wellesley News

      SECTIONS

    • News
    • Features
    • Opinions
    • Arts
    • Sports
    • Multimedia
    • Projects
    • About

      ABOUT

    • Contact
    • Join the News
    • Masthead
    • Editorial Board

      RESOURCES

    • Advertising
    • Submission
    • Subscribe

      CONTACT US

    • Contact
    COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS