• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
      Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
    • Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age
      Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age
    • Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation
      Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Controversial
      The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Controversial
    • Lucy Dacus Brings a Minimal Yet Powerful Performance to Northeastern University
      Lucy Dacus Brings a Minimal Yet Powerful Performance to Northeastern University
    • “Glass Onion” Takes Shots at Easy Targets
      “Glass Onion” Takes Shots at Easy Targets
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Rejected Snooze Articles for the Week
      Rejected Snooze Articles for the Week
    • Happy Valentine’s Day from Spog
      Happy Valentine’s Day from Spog
    • The Four Best Places to Loudly FaceTime Someone on Campus
      The Four Best Places to Loudly FaceTime Someone on Campus
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Mary Jo Granado OpinionsDecember 8, 2021

Privacy as a currency

Social media applications reach far beyond their platform to track our digital footprint. Photo courtesy of Jeremy Bezanger on Unsplash

We live in the age of information. Never before has information been so readily available and easy to access. We have technology to thank for this, which has undeniably changed every facet of our lives and woven itself into our culture. For the most part, this change has been for good. Think back to the pandemic. In a time where human contact was curtailed, social media gave us the opportunity to connect with our loved ones, while also allowing us to continue our work or education remotely. However, for whatever all these technological advances are worth, they have come at a cost: our privacy. 

While privacy might seem like an adequate trade-off in light of all the benefits that technology has given us, the extent of our personal information that is out on the web is troublesome. What we voluntarily choose to post on social media isn’t the only information of ours that is available. Companies such as Facebook — which owns other social media companies such as Instagram, Snapchat and WhatsApp — go as far as tracking you even when you’re not using their app. Facebook then keeps a log of your texts, phone calls, what you search and virtually everything about you. Using this information, they create targeted ads based on what you’re doing. In 2020 alone, Facebook made roughly $86 billion in revenue, most of which came from advertising. To make matters even worse, they are capitalizing off of invading people’s privacy. 

In 2013, when Edward Snowden came out and spoke up about the NSA spying on American citizens, everyone was rightfully outraged. Why should Big Tech companies be able to get away with doing the exact same thing? Unfortunately, it seems as though personal information itself has become the preferred currency in the age of information. We simply cannot trust big private corporations to prioritize consumers when their monetary interest will always win out. Companies know and bank on the fact that consumers won’t be reading the fine print in the terms of conditions. And who can blame consumers for not doing so? Facebook’s data and privacy policy — which is only a fraction of its terms and conditions — comes around to about 6,500 words. Just because we unknowingly consent to the invasive practices of social media companies does not make their actions any less morally abhorrent.

In many ways, technology is what we make of it. The privacy conundrum that we face is not inherently caused by social media, but by the big corporations that run them. By no means am I pushing for everyone to quit social media. I am merely pointing out that we must demand more regulation of what social media companies can do with our data. However, regulation is a challenge in itself. It doesn’t help that most members of Congress are older and have little to no knowledge on technological issues. 

Regardless of the challenge it poses, we must push for comprehensive laws that stop social media companies from invading our privacy. Otherwise, they will never stop their invasive practices. The ways that consumers can limit how social media tracks them are not as effective, so regulation must happen. Privacy isn’t a luxury but rather a fundamental right. Technological progress should never come at the cost of our rights.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleIt’s getting darker, weather we like it or not
Next articleRittenhouse acquittal: clemency for white vigilantes

You may also like

Logos of social media apps such as Twitter, Tiktok, Netflix, Spotify, and Discord.

Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity

Abstract painting of various boxes meant to imply computer and phone screens

Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age

A collection of a wide variety of foods in the colors of the rainbow

Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

  • Logos of social media apps such as Twitter, Tiktok, Netflix, Spotify, and Discord. Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
  • Stone-Davis dining staff report mistreatment
  • The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Contro...
  • A collection of a wide variety of foods in the colors of the rainbow Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflat...
  • Red envelope that contains money to celebrate the Lunar New Year. America’s cultural appropriation is a modern form of i...

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top