facebook icon facebook icon facebook icon
  • About
  • ADS
  • Masthead
    • Editorial Board
  • Submission
  • Subscribe
The Wellesley News -
  • News
    • Contract ratified by Wellesley’s Maintenance and Service Employees Union
      Contract ratified by Wellesley’s Maintenance and Service Employees Union
    • News in Brief
      News in Brief
    • Wellesley adapts to end of race conscious admissions
      Wellesley adapts to end of race conscious admissions
    • Senate Report
    • News in Brief
  • Features
    • Professor Spotlight: Dr. Faisal Ahmed
      Professor Spotlight: Dr. Faisal Ahmed
    • Spotlight: New Professor Kathryn Winner
      Spotlight: New Professor Kathryn Winner
    • Spotlight: New Professor Lucia Nhamo ’11
      Spotlight: New Professor Lucia Nhamo ’11
    • Humans of Wellesley
    • Archives
  • Opinions
    • France’s Abaya Ban Unveils Its Own Misogyny
      France’s Abaya Ban Unveils Its Own Misogyny
    • Editorial: In defense of affirmative action
      Editorial: In defense of affirmative action
    • I am an NCAA champion: we should end college recruiting
      I am an NCAA champion: we should end college recruiting
    • Editorials
    • Letters to Editors
  • Arts
    • The SAG-AFTRA and WGA Strikes: What’s happening in Hollywood?
      The SAG-AFTRA and WGA Strikes: What’s happening in Hollywood?
    • Digging into Hozier’s Unreal Unearth: “De Selby (Part 1)” and the Population of Loss
      Digging into Hozier’s Unreal Unearth: “De Selby (Part 1)” and the Population of Loss
    • Summer Releases to Help Usher in Fall
      Summer Releases to Help Usher in Fall
  • Sports
    • Gauff and Richardson Shatter Expectations
      Gauff and Richardson Shatter Expectations
    • Student Athlete of the Month: Kennedy Mayo
      Student Athlete of the Month: Kennedy Mayo
    • No image
      What even is a BORG and why does it matter?
  • Multimedia
    • Photo of the Week
      Photo of the Week
    • “Stronger Together” Rally with Chelsea Clinton
      “Stronger Together” Rally with Chelsea Clinton
    • College Government Vice President 2016 End of the Year Report
      College Government Vice President 2016 End of the Year Report
    • Podcasts
    • The Wellesley Snooze
  • Projects
      • The News in Conversation
    • About
      • Contact
      • Join the News
      • Masthead
      • Editorial Board
    By Laurel Kinman OpinionsSeptember 12, 2014

    Media wrongly reinforces harmful preconceptions of sexual assault

    Sexual assault has taken over the headlines in the past several months as more and more disturbing figures regarding the subject come to light, particularly with respect to its prevalence on college campuses. From Time magazine, whose May 26 cover flashed a red college pennant emblazoned with the word “rape” to the New York Times, which has featured at least three articles, as well as an op-ed and a “Room for Debate” forum, on the topic in the past three months alone, news pieces concerning campus sexual assault are ubiquitous and unending. Crucial as such pieces are in raising public awareness of a sensitive, yet central issue in a modern discussion of gender relations, these articles unknowingly perpetuate the problem. The media catalogues our cultural discussion of rape into two distinct, and separate, entities: the aforementioned discussion of how to end sexual assault on college campuses, and the backlash against rape culture. These are not, and should not be, two separate discussions. When we fail to regard sexual violence, on or off college campuses, as a byproduct of rape culture, we fail also the many victims, and future victims, of this violence.

    As college students, this is an issue that should be near and dear to our hearts. Too many men and women of any age know the pain of sexual violence, and, on many college campuses, the pain and degradation of the initial attack are only further compounded by humiliating interrogations by impersonal panel members, often reported to be untrained, even bewilderingly ignorant given their position, and then the subsequent inadequate response to the students’ complaints. In May, the proliferation of such offenses as these prompted the federal government to open investigation into 55 colleges and universities across the nation for violations of the landmark 1972 Title IX bill, which prohibits sexual discrimination in educational institutions that receive federal funding. Among the 55 schools highlighted were four in Boston itself: Boston University, Emerson College, and Harvard, both the college and the law school. But while we may breathe a sigh of relief that Wellesley is not on this list, we must also recognize that as necessary as it is to repair these critically damaged response systems, changing the way we respond to rape isn’t going to fix the problem. That can only be accomplished by changing the parameters of the discussion.

    In its profile of the subject, “The Sexual Assault Crisis on College Campuses,” Time magazine cites a piece authored in 2002 by David Lisak and Paul Miller, appearing in the journal Violence and Victims, that found that, in an anonymous survey of men at the University of Massachusetts, Boston, only 6.4% of study participants reported committing acts that would be defined as rape. More tellingly yet, most of the men who did so reported more than one sexual encounter in which they behaved thus. Translation: Most rape isn’t about crossed signals or mixed messages. It’s about sexual predation by repeat offenders, and “consent is sexy” and “no means no,” while important messages to convey to young people, aren’t going to change that. What we as college-aged women need more than consent education, more than safe drinking tips, and more than increased stringency in enforcement is to be respected. Which brings us back to the question of rape culture.

    It should be established at this point that not all sexual assaults are committed by men against women. Nonetheless, the majority of sexual violence does follow this pattern, and it is easy enough to see why. As young people ourselves, we are only too keenly aware of how immersed our generation is in the varied media, whether social, visual, auditory, or otherwise. Yet in almost all of these arenas the depiction of women is constructed in such a manner as to suggest that women are sexual objects, to be viewed, and ultimately possessed, by men. The camera makes voyeurs of us all, and, if the romantic comedy genre has taught us nothing else, it has taught us that men are entitled to a woman’s love, both physical and emotional, if they treat her with any degree of decency.

    So long as colleges remain on the defensive, so long as assault-prevention programs focus on the symptoms and not the disease, progress will be sluggish and disappointing. Young women will be hurt. It is not going to be easy, but if we as a society are serious about achieving change, we need to focus on changing our underlying cultural paradigms, not on quick fixes. We owe our young women — and our young men — that much at least.

    Share on

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Google +
    • LinkedIn
    • Email
    Previous articleUber broadens travel options for college students
    Next articleALS Ice Bucket Challenge: More lukewarm than frigid

    You may also like

    France’s Abaya Ban Unveils Its Own Misogyny

    Editorial: In defense of affirmative action

    I am an NCAA champion: we should end college recruiting

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    The Wellesley News

      SECTIONS

    • News
    • Features
    • Opinions
    • Arts
    • Sports
    • Multimedia
    • Projects
    • About

      ABOUT

    • Contact
    • Join the News
    • Masthead
    • Editorial Board

      RESOURCES

    • Advertising
    • Submission
    • Subscribe

      CONTACT US

    • Contact
    COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS