• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Four Cases of COVID-19 Reported During Winter Break
      Four Cases of COVID-19 Reported During Winter Break
    • Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
      Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
    • Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
      Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • The block system is a joke
      The block system is a joke
    • Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
      Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
      Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
    • Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
      Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
    • “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
      “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • No image
      Maintaining wellness as the cold sets in
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Laurel Kinman OpinionsSeptember 12, 2014

Media wrongly reinforces harmful preconceptions of sexual assault

Sexual assault has taken over the headlines in the past several months as more and more disturbing figures regarding the subject come to light, particularly with respect to its prevalence on college campuses. From Time magazine, whose May 26 cover flashed a red college pennant emblazoned with the word “rape” to the New York Times, which has featured at least three articles, as well as an op-ed and a “Room for Debate” forum, on the topic in the past three months alone, news pieces concerning campus sexual assault are ubiquitous and unending. Crucial as such pieces are in raising public awareness of a sensitive, yet central issue in a modern discussion of gender relations, these articles unknowingly perpetuate the problem. The media catalogues our cultural discussion of rape into two distinct, and separate, entities: the aforementioned discussion of how to end sexual assault on college campuses, and the backlash against rape culture. These are not, and should not be, two separate discussions. When we fail to regard sexual violence, on or off college campuses, as a byproduct of rape culture, we fail also the many victims, and future victims, of this violence.

As college students, this is an issue that should be near and dear to our hearts. Too many men and women of any age know the pain of sexual violence, and, on many college campuses, the pain and degradation of the initial attack are only further compounded by humiliating interrogations by impersonal panel members, often reported to be untrained, even bewilderingly ignorant given their position, and then the subsequent inadequate response to the students’ complaints. In May, the proliferation of such offenses as these prompted the federal government to open investigation into 55 colleges and universities across the nation for violations of the landmark 1972 Title IX bill, which prohibits sexual discrimination in educational institutions that receive federal funding. Among the 55 schools highlighted were four in Boston itself: Boston University, Emerson College, and Harvard, both the college and the law school. But while we may breathe a sigh of relief that Wellesley is not on this list, we must also recognize that as necessary as it is to repair these critically damaged response systems, changing the way we respond to rape isn’t going to fix the problem. That can only be accomplished by changing the parameters of the discussion.

In its profile of the subject, “The Sexual Assault Crisis on College Campuses,” Time magazine cites a piece authored in 2002 by David Lisak and Paul Miller, appearing in the journal Violence and Victims, that found that, in an anonymous survey of men at the University of Massachusetts, Boston, only 6.4% of study participants reported committing acts that would be defined as rape. More tellingly yet, most of the men who did so reported more than one sexual encounter in which they behaved thus. Translation: Most rape isn’t about crossed signals or mixed messages. It’s about sexual predation by repeat offenders, and “consent is sexy” and “no means no,” while important messages to convey to young people, aren’t going to change that. What we as college-aged women need more than consent education, more than safe drinking tips, and more than increased stringency in enforcement is to be respected. Which brings us back to the question of rape culture.

It should be established at this point that not all sexual assaults are committed by men against women. Nonetheless, the majority of sexual violence does follow this pattern, and it is easy enough to see why. As young people ourselves, we are only too keenly aware of how immersed our generation is in the varied media, whether social, visual, auditory, or otherwise. Yet in almost all of these arenas the depiction of women is constructed in such a manner as to suggest that women are sexual objects, to be viewed, and ultimately possessed, by men. The camera makes voyeurs of us all, and, if the romantic comedy genre has taught us nothing else, it has taught us that men are entitled to a woman’s love, both physical and emotional, if they treat her with any degree of decency.

So long as colleges remain on the defensive, so long as assault-prevention programs focus on the symptoms and not the disease, progress will be sluggish and disappointing. Young women will be hurt. It is not going to be easy, but if we as a society are serious about achieving change, we need to focus on changing our underlying cultural paradigms, not on quick fixes. We owe our young women — and our young men — that much at least.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleUber broadens travel options for college students
Next articleALS Ice Bucket Challenge: More lukewarm than frigid

You may also like

A piece of pizza missing topings.

Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?

The block system is a joke

Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top