• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
      Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
    • Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
      Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
    • Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health
      Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • The block system is a joke
      The block system is a joke
    • Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
      Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
      Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
    • Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
      Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
    • “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
      “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • No image
      Maintaining wellness as the cold sets in
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Nikita Nagras OpinionsFebruary 11, 2015

Education, not forced immunization: tackling the measles outbreak

After 50 years as a measles-free nation, an outbreak of measles in December shocked the nation, sparking debate on the benefits and dangers of vaccines. Ultimately, the debate concerns the clash between freedom of choice and public safety rather than a question of medical advantages. At the same time, misinformation about vaccines abounds in Internet forums and local media, exacerbating the public’s fears about immunizations. While medical research proves that vaccination benefits society as a whole, forced immunization that disregards religious and cultural beliefs should not be the solution. Instead, health organizations and medical professionals should collaborate to provide accessible information about vaccinations, their importance and possible side effects. In addition, health experts must challenge and thoroughly debunk every voice that protests against vaccines before ungrounded fears can grip the public.

As per American democratic values, every person reserves the right to make decisions for their own bodies. Mandatory vaccination would remove any freedom of choice and invalidate the concept of informed consent. According to medical law, patients reserve the right to choose whether or not to undergo a medical procedure only after a health professional informs them of the success rate and possible risks. The law should apply the same ethics to vaccination. Furthermore, when we give up the right to make decisions about our own bodies, we lose the privilege of being able to think critically about what’s best for ourselves. Mandatory vaccination would only increase people’s ignorance, as the public would become more passive with regards to vaccinations and their effects. Imposed laws would only curtail people’s choice and antagonize the public as they would feel that the government was overstepping boundaries by making personal choices for them.

Some argue that the main purpose of vaccination is not simply to prevent people from catching incurable diseases but to provide herd immunity. Indeed, the National Institute of Health proposes that some vaccines can be considered “altruistic medical procedures” because they provide more protection to society than the patient, who runs the risks of the associated procedure. In cases where procedures on individuals would protect society at large, public safety should supposedly overrule personal liberty. However, most medical professionals agree that herd immunity can only be achieved if 95 percent of the population is vaccinated. According to a recent Center for Control of Diseases and Prevention report, 94.5% of kindergarteners throughout the nation are vaccinated for measles, mumps, and rubella, and 95.1% are vaccinated for acellular pertussis. In states with the lowest vaccination rates, the percentage of those who are vaccinated borders 90 percent. Such statistics demonstrate that the majority of the population leans toward vaccination, and the likelihood of a disease spreading wildly is very low. In any case, people who are exempting from vaccinations for religious or philosophical reasons are not likely to follow mandatory laws that oppose their principles; people with strong inclinations will certainly find loopholes or ways to avoid vaccinations.

However, anti-vaccine campaigns are gaining momentum, and more people are exempting themselves from vaccinations. Although the danger of contagion may not be immediate, the American public’s lack of knowledge on the topic will hurt future generations. In order to fully maximize herd immunity, our goal should be to reach out to parts of the demographic that remain uncertain about the benefits and risks associated with vaccinations. Ignorance and lack of education threaten public safety more than flexible laws regarding vaccination. A single voice of protest can easily halt several immunization campaigns, because people’s fears of vaccinations stem from lack of knowledge. Even today, anti-vaccination advocates and politicians continue to quote Andrew Wakefield’s thoroughly debunked study from 1998 that linked vaccinations to autism in children. In order to counteract fearful dissent, health professionals and vaccination advocates should make information regarding vaccines readily accessible to the public. This does not simply entail uploading free information on the Internet, but reframing scientific research and experience in a way that would be easily understood by the masses and be used to challenge every media outlet that argues against vaccines. Ironically, the problem lies in America’s success with preventing contagious diseases; American vaccinations have so successfully halted the spread of most diseases that the threat of contagion is not readily apparent to most Americans. Increasing awareness of vaccinations and informing the public of the long history behind vaccines would be the first step in reducing the general ignorance and complacency on the topic.

As per the State of Massachusetts mandate, all college students must be immunized against certain preventable diseases before arriving on campus. Likewise, Wellesley College requires that all students receive vaccinations for measles, mumps, rubella, tetanus, diphtheria, hepatitis B, and meningitis.

Prospective students should not be denied the privilege of education because of their immunization status, but unvaccinated students must uphold the consequences of their choice. If the college asks unvaccinated students to leave the College in cases of a contagion breakout or requests that they refrain from living in dorms altogether, then they must follow the rules to protect themselves and others. Health Services at Wellesley already offers free flu shots intermittently throughout the year, and the lack of expense encourages more students to immunize themselves and strengthens herd immunity.

In a clash between public safety and personal liberty, it seems obvious to protect general society first and foremost. However, forced medical procedures would only serve to antagonize the public even further, as such an imposition would curtail their choice and would remove responsibility for their own bodies. In such cases, we should increase awareness, reduce ignorance and trust that the general public would make an informed choice.

Photo Courtesy of Creative Commons.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleJordan’s failed negotiations reveal the truth about engaging with ISIS
Next articleSchneider needs space for Student’s Aid Society’s clothes closet

You may also like

A piece of pizza missing topings.

Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?

The block system is a joke

Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top