• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Four Cases of COVID-19 Reported During Winter Break
      Four Cases of COVID-19 Reported During Winter Break
    • Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
      Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
    • Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
      Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • The block system is a joke
      The block system is a joke
    • Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
      Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
      Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
    • Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
      Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
    • “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
      “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • No image
      Maintaining wellness as the cold sets in
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Lizamaria Arias Opinions, The Elephant in the RoomFebruary 11, 2015

Jordan’s failed negotiations reveal the truth about engaging with ISIS

Brokering a deal between two parties with different perspectives and end goals is difficult enough. How do you arrive at an agreement with a party that not only has a radically different end goal than your own, but also has absolutely no respect for human life, doesn’t tolerate those with different ideologies and views terrorism as a means to an end? The answer is simple: you don’t.

Last December, Jordanian air pilot Moath al-Kasasbeh was captured by ISIS when his aircraft crashed during a mission over Syria. Near the end of January, ISIS delivered a message to Jordan demanding the release of terrorist Sajida al-Rishawi by sunset or al-Kasasbeh would die. ISIS also linked the release of al-Rishawi to the fate of the Japanese journalist, Kenji Goto, claiming that his death would follow al-Kasabeh’s. The world was surprised when Jordan acquiesced and said they would release al-Rishawi after they received proof that the pilot was still alive.

Tensions mounted as the hour drew near and ISIS refused to produce proof of al- Kasabeh’s survival. As the sun set on Jan. 29, the dead line to bring al-Rishawi to the border, Jordan and Japan awaited the fate of the hostages. A few days later, ISIS released its most gruesome and inhumane video to date, showing al-Kasasbeh’s incineration in a cage.

Intelligence later revealed that the video was not a response to Jordan’s failure to release al-Rishawi, but had actually been shot a month before. ISIS never had any intention of releasing the pilot; according to this information, al- Kasasbeh had been dead since Jan. 3.

This tactic, which is often referred to as information warfare, relies on manipulation and deception to weaken the enemy. Had Jordan released al-Rishawi, the decision would have caused problems for the country and increased tension between the Arab nations. ISIS knew how to play on the emotions of Jordanians and hoped that they would allow emotion to win over reason — it nearly worked.

Major powers, particularly the US, have long touted the axiom, “we do not negotiate with terrorists.” Last May, after President Obama’s controversial decision to release five Guantanamo detainees in exchange for Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, critics denounced the action as setting a dangerous precedent while supporters claimed that the exchange posed no security threat since the detainees had been out of the field for a while and were not likely to return to terrorist activity. However, recent intelligence has alerted the US that at least one of the detainees has attempted to make contact with the Taliban. Although the situation is being monitored closely and there appears to be no imminent threat, according to intelligence officials, the facts remain the same. When America and other countries engage with terrorists we stand to lose more than the terrorists do, because they do not play by the rules. While the President Obama’s negotiations seemed harmless to supporters they set a dangerous precedent, they allowed terrorists to return home and gave them the opportunity to reach out to terror groups once again, but worst of all, they made others in the international community entertain the thought that negotiating with terrorists might not be such a bad idea. Thankfully, Jordan did not fall for ISIS’s deception.

Negotiations assume that there is a set of rules by which both parties will abide — but terrorists do not adhere to rules or lofty doctrines. ISIS has shown this time and time again. While it is tempting to want to try and save one of our own, it is crucial to remember that the difference between us and them is principle. Terrorists do not negotiate with transparency and they do not deliver on their promises. It is a very slippery slope to engage these terrorist groups and treat them like we would any other nation on the international stage. They are not legitimate groups and they do not deserve to be treated as such.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleMedia coverage on Boko Haram indicates Western bias
Next articleEducation, not forced immunization: tackling the measles outbreak

You may also like

A piece of pizza missing topings.

Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?

The block system is a joke

Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top