• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Four Cases of COVID-19 Reported During Winter Break
      Four Cases of COVID-19 Reported During Winter Break
    • Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
      Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
    • Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
      Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • The block system is a joke
      The block system is a joke
    • Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
      Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
      Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
    • Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
      Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
    • “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
      “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • No image
      Maintaining wellness as the cold sets in
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Victoria Angelova OpinionsSeptember 23, 2015

Hillary Clinton’s education reform will alleviate student debt

When looking at the numbers connected to student loans, it confounds me that only three presidential candidates have come forward with education reforms. Twelve percent of all Americans have a student loan to repay. The debt they have accumulated, $1.3 trillion, is greater than the nominal GDP of Mexico in 2014. Hillary Clinton has proposed a long-overdue education reform that despite its flaws will alleviate the burden on future students of lower income and on current students with outstanding loans. At the same time it will make certain that states spend more on colleges, ensuring their affordability.

Repaying a student loan reminds me of Shakespeare’s “The Merchant of Venice,” wherein a character had to cut a pound of flesh from his body to repay a debt. There are two major issues with the current repayment system: first, there is no limit on how much a loan payment can make up of a student’s income, and second, the interest rate is higher than it should be. Many politicians, including Democrat Elizabeth Warren, have openly protested against the fact that student loans have become a source of revenue for the federal and state governments. Clinton’s program tackles these issues by ensuring that a student’s payment will never be more than 10 percent of their income, and that graduates with outstanding debts will be able to refinance it at current interest rates (4.39 percent for undergraduate students). The interest rate for future college students will be lower from the beginning.

The hardest challenge for the reform, which may also make the biggest difference, is lowering university tuition. Her reform envisions free community college, earning a debt-free four-year degree from state schools and rewarding states that invest more in higher education. Her plan includes colleges that reduce the costs, ones that are more capable of serving a minority or low-income population, using additional grants. The Atlantic argued that requiring states to increase spending on universities might be perceived as an expansion of federal power. While the states’ reaction is a valid concern, the aspects of the reform that go beyond the students and force states and universities out of their comfort zones make it a game changer.

Another concern, voiced by Steven C. Bahls, the president of Augustana College, in an op-ed for the Washington Post, is that making undergraduate education at public institutions debt-free will steer students away from applying to private universities, which can offer very generous financial aid packages. He refers to Michelle Obama’s description of the support she received at Princeton University as a first generation undergraduate and her calls for collaboration between private and public institutions in lowering costs. I have to disagree with Bahls. If Clinton’s reforms are implemented, students will still be able to apply to private institutions. If they are not accepted in private universities, or find the cost too high, they will have an opportunity to pursue their education in a state university debt-free. The choice between attending a private or a public institution is hard, but the reform does not remove it altogether.

So what is the downside? The reform will cost $350 billion for the next 10 years, and Clinton will limit the tax deductions for some high-income taxpayers to fund it. Republicans have protested this provision, and I can understand their frustration. While the program is mostly oriented towards low-income students, it will be funded with high-income taxpayers’ money. An argument can be made that the people investing in this reform will not be the ones to reap the benefits. To me, an investment in future generations of American students, regardless of their debt is an investment in America.

This reform will encourage students to focus on their studies, rather than funding them, thus, transforming higher education for the better.

Photo courtesy of Graphics Editor Padya Paramita ’18

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleDrought deprives America of quintessential green lawn
Next articleUnited States has moral responsibility to take in Middle East refugees

You may also like

A piece of pizza missing topings.

Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?

The block system is a joke

Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

  • Four Cases of COVID-19 Reported During Winter Break

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top