• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
      Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
    • Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
      Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
    • Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health
      Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • The block system is a joke
      The block system is a joke
    • Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
      Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
      Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
    • Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
      Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
    • “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
      “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • No image
      Maintaining wellness as the cold sets in
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Kele Alfred-Igbokwe OpinionsSeptember 30, 2015

United States fails to provide for women in the workplace

The United States has always prided itself on being a free market economy. In our hyper capitalized society, everyone wants to outwork the other and become the best in their fields. From birth, we are practically raised to compete amongst ourselves and win at all costs. This creates a negative environment of cutthroat competition in which Americans aim to “succeed,” no matter the sacrifice. This weighs particularly heavily on women, as it is difficult for women to give up taking care of their families, which is seen as a traditionally female role, in order to “get ahead” in their careers. We need an equal opportunity society that values women’s work. We should give both men and women a chance to progress in the workplace.

In 1800s America, women were almost always constrained to work in the home, rearing children, cooking, cleaning and doing laundry. Household work was seen as not only women’s personal duty, but also their primary labor. As a result, women were less likely to seek outside employment. Instead, their husbands were the sole breadwinners and received all the income for the household.

Flash forward 200 years later, and it seems women are still facing the same problem of being forced to choose between their careers and their families. More and more women have to sacrifice promotion in their careers in order to be responsible for their homes. American work culture of “survival of the fittest,” does not help. Employers would simply prefer people without the burden of taking care of children and/or elderly people, because they would be able to work longer hours and chug out more production. This shuts out many career women who are also mothers, because they are expected to put their work before their family. This is not right.

For example, there is no guaranteed paid maternity leave in the United States. The United States does not legally mandate pay for women or men who have to take time off to have a baby and take care of the baby. Women are expected to juggle both having a new baby and a demanding, production-oriented job. This places women at an unfair disadvantage in the workforce.

In the workforce, women are still being shut out of executive positions. Only 10 to 20 percent of women are in senior management in American businesses. This can be a direct result of apathetic bosses who do not take into consideration the fact that women tend to have to balance their work life with their family life. As a result, women tend to be left behind, compared to their male counterparts, when it comes to executive positions in the corporate world.

If we as a society incorporated “care-giving” the way we incorporate “competition,” we could have a much fairer workforce. This includes high-quality and affordable child care and elder care; paid family and medical leave for women and men; a right to request part-time or flexible work; investment in early education comparable to our investment in elementary and secondary education; and comprehensive job protection for pregnant workers.

Women still shoulder the responsibility of care: care for the children, care for the elderly. Both women and men are expected to be competitive in terms of production quantity at work, in a society that prizes quantity over quality, yet, just like in the 1800s, 200 years ago, only women are expected by society to take care of their families as well. This unfairly disenfranchises women in the workplace.

I believe that we should be an equal opportunity society, and give both men and women a chance to flourish and be competitive in the workplace. Women need to benefit from a work culture that accommodates caregiving and not only competition. It’s about time we institute policies like paid paternity leave and better child care facilities. It’s time we value household work as a legitimate job sector.

Photo courtesy of Liberty Voice

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleFrom psych wards to cell blocks: How the prison system hurts the mentally ill
Next articleEditorial: We stand with Planned Parenthood

You may also like

A piece of pizza missing topings.

Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?

The block system is a joke

Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top