• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
      Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
    • Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
      Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
    • Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health
      Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • The block system is a joke
      The block system is a joke
    • Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
      Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
      Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
    • Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
      Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
    • “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
      “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • No image
      Maintaining wellness as the cold sets in
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By thewellesleynews Opinions, Staff EditorialOctober 7, 2015

Editorial: We stand with Planned Parenthood

Photo courtesy of Planned Parenthood

In 2014, Planned Parenthood provided nearly 10.6 million affordably priced health care services to more than five million patients. The vast majority of these services involve cancer screening, STD testing and contraception. Despite the diversity of services,  opponents of Planned Parenthood have zeroed in on abortions, which constitute only three percent of services last year, yet remain  Planned Parenthood’s biggest political case in the past few years. While opponents claim ethical and moral authority in their arguments, their stances and actions bear resemblance to blatant attacks on women’s freedom. The grievances held against Planned Parenthood are no different than those held a century ago. In 1914, the organization’s founder was arrested for distributing pamphlets on the street to promote birth control methods. Last week’s threat to defund Planned Parenthood is another clear demonstration against women’s reproductive rights. The current sensationalized opposition, especially in the case of abortions, does nothing but detract from women’s empowerment. Thousands of Americans protect guns fervently but turn their backs when it comes to protecting women’s reproductive rights.

Earlier this year, a pro-life group released a video in which Planned Parenthood officials discussed selling organs and tissue from aborted fetuses for profit. After Planned Parenthood asserted that the videos are edited, Congress launched an investigation. Investigations have found no evidence whatsoever that Planned Parenthood profits from selling fetal tissues, but the opposition does not seem to care about evidence. Not only does the opposition have no substantial evidence to prove the statements in the video, Planned Parenthood does not use federal funds to perform abortions unless the patients are the victims of rape, incest, or are facing major health problems, as dictated by the Hyde Amendment. Republicans attempted to defund an organization that supports women’s health based on unreliable and circumstantial evidence.

Undoubtedly, the highly private, personal choice of women has become a matter of debate in the public forum. In the past weeks, protesters on both sides have gathered outside government buildings. People turned up with signs of “If I turn my fetus into a corporation, will y’all stop regulating it?” and “Life begins at conception and ends at Planned Parenthood.” With the 2016 elections looming near, political figures too have taken the opportunity to earn supporters by attacking or defending the organization.

Republicans have announced their intention to shut down the government — in order to defund Planned Parenthood. The bill that Republicans hope to pass involves a nationwide ban on abortion at or after 20 weeks. Upon closer scrutiny it’s clear that the bill  does not defend a moral cause, as many argue, but rather is a political strategy. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, only 1.3 percent of women perform abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy. This 1.3 percent  largely consists of women who discover fetal abnormalities or health risks. Nevertheless, as the bill fails to protect women from health risks, it also fails to protect rape victims. In order to be able to have an abortion after 20 weeks, the proponents require that victims have reported the rape case to the police. This requirement is, of course, a barrier to protection; rape victims often suffer at the hands of relatives and bear a tremendous emotional burden, deterring them from ever reporting the case. The case against Planned Parenthood is inherently flawed. It’s a sensationalist argument that ignores women rights.

26 percent of the organization’s patients are teenagers and 75 percent of them have incomes near the federal poverty level. We need to move towards helping patients who are young or who would otherwise not be able to pay for more access to health care, instead of taking away their health care providers. Planned Parenthood receives approximately a third of its money in government grants and contracts, so that defunding could be devastating. Defunding would mean that fewer patients would receive cancer treatment, contraception, treatment for STDs and sexual education. The early detection of cancer is of paramount importance to its successful treatment and the organization currently helps more than 1.8 million people detect and treat cancer.

As a group of students who cares deeply about women’s reproductive rights, The Wellesley News Staff supports Planned Parenthood’s work to protect women’s health. This is one of many challenges that  the reproductive rights movements has and will face, and we believe in the importance of supporting women’s power to control their own bodies in every single one of these cases. We are grateful to be part of a community that cares and discusses women’s rights passionately, that understands the urgency of declaring solidarity for reproductive rights. Along with public displays of support in form of cover photos and Facebook, we should lobby our Senators and Congressmen to protect Planned Parenthood. If we are true advocates of life, then let us celebrate an organization that  prevents thousands of cancer deaths with early detection and let us celebrate an organization that offers women dignified lives by preventing long-term diseases and allows them to make decisions about their own bodies. 

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleUnited States fails to provide for women in the workplace
Next articlePrioritize on-campus discussions instead of lectures

You may also like

A piece of pizza missing topings.

Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?

The block system is a joke

Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top