• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
      Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
    • Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age
      Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age
    • Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation
      Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Controversial
      The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Controversial
    • Lucy Dacus Brings a Minimal Yet Powerful Performance to Northeastern University
      Lucy Dacus Brings a Minimal Yet Powerful Performance to Northeastern University
    • “Glass Onion” Takes Shots at Easy Targets
      “Glass Onion” Takes Shots at Easy Targets
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Rejected Snooze Articles for the Week
      Rejected Snooze Articles for the Week
    • Happy Valentine’s Day from Spog
      Happy Valentine’s Day from Spog
    • The Four Best Places to Loudly FaceTime Someone on Campus
      The Four Best Places to Loudly FaceTime Someone on Campus
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By thewellesleynews Opinions, Staff EditorialOctober 26, 2016

Data leaks should not infringe on privacy without due cause

Photo Courtesy of The Herald Sun

The purpose of journalism is to pursue the truth and convey it effectively to the public. In that pursuit, journalists may find themselves in ethical grey areas that require thoughtful consideration. The intentional disclosure of Hillary Clinton’s emails by WikiLeaks serves as one of many hot-button examples of this ethical grey zone. Though journalists must determine if ethics and truth-seeking are mutually exclusive on a case-by-case basis, their investigations should not personally harm individuals while keeping those in power accountable for their actions.

In determining the ethics of investigations, journalists and consumers should carefully consider the source and method of the leaks. While the leaks have been powerful in initiating investigation, they are not without political bias or malintention. Many, including CIA Director, Mike Morell, have suggested a high probability of Russian government and WikiLeaks collaboration in disclosing emails from both Clinton Foundation and Hillary Clinton’s campaign. In corroboration, the Department of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence asserted in a joint statement, “The recent disclosures of alleged hacked emails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts.”  Moreover, both entities  went on to assign a political character to the leak: to interfere with the U.S. election process. Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, said, in an interview with Afshin Rattansi, that it was likely state actors, including Russia specifically, that hacked the Democratic National Convention. Former WikiLeaks employees, such as Kevin Ball, have confirmed Assange and WikiLeaks’s anti-Clinton bias. Ball has claimed that Assange is hoping to reclaim his fame and settle a score with Clinton, who lambasted Assange when she was Secretary of State. For what it’s worth, Eric Snowden, a famous whistleblower of the NSA’s activities, believes that the WikiLeak’s failure to even moderately curate the data leak is a “shot at reclaiming the world stage, and settling a score with Hillary Clinton as he does so.” Perhaps WikiLeaks has released necessary information; however, the manner in which it has done so is both harmful and undemocratic.

What the Clinton email leak does show is that WikiLeaks is not a democratizing tool and remains marred by political bias. In direct contrast to the early WikiLeaks release of Iraq and Afghanistan war logs and State Department cables, no information from the Clinton emails was curated. For the war logs and cables, WikiLeaks employees redacted information to protect innocent people and met with the State Department in order to figure out what information should be withheld. This act of editing before the leak shows that WikiLeaks was more interested in providing the American people with information than sharing personal information. Unfortunately, WikiLeaks has not maintained this practice consistently or ethically — instead, it has increasingly relied upon bad leaks.

According to the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, there are specific definitions for good and bad leaks. A good leak is “the disclosure of information that expands public understanding of an issue of public interest – without harming anyone,” while a bad leak is defined as “one that does harm and does not aid public understanding of an important public issue.” Consequently, journalists must consider intent and content when deciding what leaks to leverage in reporting. The use of bad leaks reveals tawdry information, while that of good has the potential to create a more democratic world.

These definitions are also helpful when we consider other large WikiLeaks like the “Erdogan emails,” which regarded Turkey’s military coup. These emails did contain valuable information about corruption and censorship in Erdogan’s regime. However, they also included the voter ID numbers, phone numbers and addresses of nearly every female voter in Turkey in 79 out of 81 provinces. In a society where women are under threat of being harmed, disclosing such information is not valuable, but dangerous. Therefore, leaks need to be curated, not only to protect classified information that, if released, would endanger outgroups and less powerful populations from violence.

As journalists, the decision to report private information ultimately requires  thoughtful consideration and curation. Respecting the rights of others and the pursuit of truth is what separates a news publication from a tabloid; “telling it all” sounds democratic but is unethical. Leaks that focus on propelling better policy are superior to those focused on embarrassing the subject or author of the leak. Even in the modern age, journalists still hold a large degree of power. The winner of a debate is determined not by the arguments and rebuttals of the candidates themselves, but how journalists and talk show hosts craft the conversation around it. The public also relies on the news for information, so journalistic judgment and ethics are imperative. With the 24-hour news cycle, success of journalism is dictated by its relative quantity of consumers. While sordid details about personal relationships and gossip draw more clicks, journalists, bloggers and any online media user must exercise judgment when confronted with leaked information. We, the Wellesley News, remind ourselves of our purpose to inform our community, hold those in power accountable and avoid the desire to focus on personally harmful stories.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleLetter to the Editor
Next articleEthics should not be conflated with religious morals

You may also like

Logos of social media apps such as Twitter, Tiktok, Netflix, Spotify, and Discord.

Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity

Abstract painting of various boxes meant to imply computer and phone screens

Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age

A collection of a wide variety of foods in the colors of the rainbow

Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

  • Stone-Davis dining staff report mistreatment
  • Logos of social media apps such as Twitter, Tiktok, Netflix, Spotify, and Discord. Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
  • The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Contro...
  • A collection of a wide variety of foods in the colors of the rainbow Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflat...
  • Red envelope that contains money to celebrate the Lunar New Year. America’s cultural appropriation is a modern form of i...

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top