• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
      Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
    • Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
      Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
    • Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health
      Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • The block system is a joke
      The block system is a joke
    • Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
      Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
      Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
    • Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
      Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
    • “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
      “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • No image
      Maintaining wellness as the cold sets in
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Genae Matthews OpinionsOctober 26, 2016

Ethics should not be conflated with religious morals

Photo Courtesy of Centre of Pan African Thought

When U.S. politicians, performers or celebrity figures attempt to paint themselves as morally righteous, they often do so by asserting their adherence to Christian values. Since 83 percent of Americans identify as Christian, this move may be motivated more by pragmatism than honest religious fervor. Nevertheless, these discussions seem to have made morally good acts of love and compassion tied to religious tradition to the extent that those who act lovingly and compassionately are assumed to be religious.

Certainly these conversations aren’t unique to U.S. celebrity culture. Since self-identified atheists constitute approximately 13 percent of the world’s population, it’s safe to say that most world leaders and activists either honestly practice a religion, falsely assert themselves to be practicing a religion or are uncomfortable admitting their lack of religious devotion. These numbers are not troubling by default.  Religious institutions and spiritual practices play a significant role in improving elements such as individual communities, humanitarian causes and even mental health treatments. However, when religion comes to be tethered to morality such that a lack of religious tradition entails a lack of moral righteousness, we should be critical. This conflation of religious or spiritual devotion with respectable morals is a problematic one. 

Even when read solely for historical inquiry, it’s hard to deny that texts such as the Bible, the Bhagavad Gita, the Torah and the Qu’ran all seem to be offering some sort of guidance for living one’s best life. While religious teachings are certainly capable of offering moral guidance, all ethical guides do not exist solely as a result of religious doctrines.

In order to separate religion from moral righteousness, it seems necessary to first define what exactly a religion is. While the diversity of worldwide religious thought is nearly unfathomable, for pragmatism’s sake we can define a religion as a system of faith and worship that involves some form of deity or deities.  Thus western moral philosophy, which clearly lacks both deities and worship, seems to be an easy case for preserving ethics sans religion. Of course, religious thought precedes both western moral philosophy and other ethical paradigms. We could argue extensively about whether moral virtuousness existed before religious thought was formalized or whether modern ethical theories could have risen without their religious predecessors. However, I think it’s safe to say that at least in the present day and age, there must exist some non-religious methods of moral guidance.

The limits of human cognition prevent us from fully understanding the morals of others. With an awareness of these inhibitions in play, I’d argue that our window of perception lies in watching those around us prioritize. ‘Prioritize’ doesn’t mean simply to prefer one thing over another, but to place something at a level of fundamental importance.  Most often, people whom we claim have admirable morals are those who prioritize empathy, compassion and love over self-absorption and vengeance. We admire these priorities because of a seemingly unspoken consensus that those admirable choices aren’t natural.  When relationships fail, ideas don’t materialize or families separate, it takes effort and motivation to respond empathetically.  Empathy necessitates an attempt to comprehend emotions other than our own and act accordingly, an effort that requires children to learn it and adults to practice it.

For 87 percent of the world’s population, this motivation likely has spiritual underpinnings, whether through explicit teachings or implicit cultural agreement. For the other 13 percent, these motivations must come from elsewhere. It seems untenable to entertain the idea that this 13 percent simply accounts for the portion of the population that lacks morals entirely. I don’t think I’m alone in attesting that some of the most loving people I’ve known have been agnostic, and I’ve certainly met some seemingly not-so-righteous people who have been religious devout. If loving is a morally good act, then those agnostics certainly aren’t in moral deficit.

How exactly ethics and religion are conflated is difficult to comprehend. It may be a centuries-old issue, but it is one that we should continue to examine with a critical and nuanced eye. It takes no more than a case study to prove this issue to still be a live controversy.  Suppose there are two women volunteering at a hospital.  Each woman has taken substantial time out of her weekly work schedule to do room visits, and each woman exudes an equal amount of thought, love and compassion to each patient. One of these women is a Christian, and she asserts her faith to be the motivation behind the joy she finds in her work. The other woman is an atheist, whose love for her work comes from an affinity she has for volunteerism and social interaction.  Is one of these women more morally righteous than the other?  The conclusion is not obvious. Rather, it seems there is ample room for discourse. If these conversations are open, then religion and ethics are not to be conflated.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleData leaks should not infringe on privacy without due cause
Next articleCollege admissions process unfairly favors higher-income applicants

You may also like

A piece of pizza missing topings.

Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?

The block system is a joke

Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top