• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
      Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
    • It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
      It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
    • What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
      What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • No image
      Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy
    • No image
      Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand
    • Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
      Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
      Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
    • Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
      Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
    • The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
      The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Samantha Churchill OpinionsFebruary 24, 2017

Identity is not politics, but it is political

Photo by Samantha Churchill '20

“The optics aren’t great,” admitted Wellesley Professor Thomas Cushman as he and another white man prepared to begin their conversation on why “Identity is Not Politics.” Nonetheless, last Wednesday Columbia University professor and author of The New York Times article “The End of Identity Liberalism,” Mark Lilla spoke with Cushman on the controversial topic in front of a full house. Many, including myself, initially thought that Lilla might dismiss the struggles associated with minority groups as irrelevant or exaggerated. However, looking past the provocative title, I found that the lecture revolved around a case for playing politics.

Since we live not in a pure democracy but in a democratic republic, decisions are made by those who win elections, whether we like it or not. Thus, Lilla argues that though ‘minority issues’ are real and do need to be addressed, they have to go on the back burner in the media and on the campaign trail. He advocates for expanding the liberal base by placing issues that directly affect the ‘vast majority’ of Americans at the forefront of the platform in order to win elections and put liberals in positions of power to then quietly pursue more specific social issues. I, however, have no desire to see a politician duck questions on LGBTQ+ rights and mandatory minimums even if they would clandestinely attempt to address these issues if elected, nor do I believe that this is a viable strategy for winning elections.

One thing that attracted so many voters to President Trump is their perception, disillusioned as it may be, that he “tells it like it is.” Voters have become so wary of the backhanded games politicians play that they were willing to elect a novice just to see if he could shake up Washington. Dodging specific social issues may be a good way to avoid making enemies, but it is also a good way to lose allies. Something Lilla failed to address is that these ‘minority issues’ don’t only matter to the group of Americans they directly pertain to. I am heterosexual and no candidate who denies or dismisses gay rights will ever win my vote. That’s the thing about most liberals: though we sometimes deal with issues surrounding identity, we pride ourselves on equal treatment for all Americans, regardless of how they identify. In his New York Times article, Lilla advocates for “appealing to Americans as Americans.” But how can a liberal candidate do this and then ignore that some citizens systematically have their rights infringed on—the same rights that are supposed to be guaranteed to them as citizens of the United States. Pretending that we are all equal when we clearly suffer from gaping inequalities is irresponsible, and to do so in the name of winning an election is immoral.

Though it is worthwhile to try to expand the liberal base, avoiding the issues surrounding civil rights and equal treatment will more quickly deface our ideology than develop it. This is not to say that leftist ideology consists solely of ‘minority issues’, but the ideas of equal opportunity and equal protection that drive those issues are also the values at the heart of the liberal identity. It may seem paradoxical, but I believe there is a way to bridge or at least lessen the divide in what was once an ideological spectrum without compromising the core values on either side. This starts with conversation. Despite Lilla’s claim that simply having a discussion isn’t good enough, he advocated vigorously for having conversations with individuals whose values not only differ from, but contradict our own. It is here that I join his calls for change.

After this election, it is safe to say that there is next to no need to invigorate the liberal base, which means that the best way to perpetuate liberal values is to rally support from those who don’t already agree to you. This means that, starting now, we have to make the conscious shift from ‘expressive’ to ‘persuasive expression’ of our beliefs. Unfortunately, this means shifting away from clever memes and satirical talk shows that only alienate those with opposing views, and towards the much less sexy: logical arguments and open minds. Though surely not all conversations will be productive, it is at the very least a step in the right direction. If we make no attempt to understand the motives of those on the other side of the aisle than we can’t possibly expect them to try to understand ours.

Identity is political, but in Lilla’s eyes it is not an effective way to play politics. With our country divided, there is an urgent need to find commonality that we have to address, but that cannot come at the cost of dismissing blatant and widespread injustice. If these issues are taken out of the mainstream media and out of the debates, it will become far too easy for elected officials to continue to dismiss them in once in office. Compromising on our calls for equal rights for all Americans in the name of getting a “liberal” elected will spell not only the end of identity liberalism but also the end of liberalism itself.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleFlynn’s resignation is merely a preview of coming White House pandemonium
Next articleThe federal government is too negligent of infrastructural failings

You may also like

Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification

It’s time to put traditional grading to the test

Banner reading this website has been seized over images of a book shelf

What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top