• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
      Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
    • Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
      Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
    • Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health
      Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • The block system is a joke
      The block system is a joke
    • Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
      Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
      Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
    • Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
      Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
    • “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
      “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • No image
      Maintaining wellness as the cold sets in
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Ciara Wardlow Arts, ReviewsSeptember 23, 2017

Darren Aronofsky’s “mother!” is an explosive rant of a film

The Jennifer Lawrence starrer has inspired polarized reactions and poor box of office returns Photo courtesy of Paramount Pictures

Some critics are calling “mother!” one of the worst movies ever made. Others are calling it genius. Regardless, critics and other inhabitants of film Twitter are just about the only people seeing it, because with an “F” CinemaScore, Darren Aronofsky’s latest endeavor is a bona fide box office flop. Whether or not it’s because of the film itself, marketing that missed the mark, an inability to compete with the undying allure of a killer clown or some combination thereof, audiences are simply not lining up to see Jennifer Lawrence hyperventilate for two hours.

Which is a shame, because, believe it or not, “mother!” is actually worth seeing.

But before really delving into why, one thing needs to be made clear: “mother!,” though definitely horrific at times and loosely structured in the vein of the tried and true home invasion narrative that is a mainstay of the horror genre, is not really best understood as a horror film. Imagining a horror film is imagining the sort of story that can be told around a summer camp bonfire late at night, complete with a prank-loving camp counsellor ready to jump out of the darkness in full costume at just the right moment to scar a gaggle of youngsters for life.

“mother!” is not one of those types of stories. It is really most accurate to speak of the film not as a story, but as a rant—a cinematic explosion of bile and nervous energy, an overflowing of anger and fear and regret.

Like most rants, “mother!” is self-indulgent and prone to tangents and overblown hyperbole. That said, for these shortcomings, it also has that bizarre, unnerving element of spectacle that all truly inspired rants do. And perhaps more importantly, like most rants that have spent a long time building, there is actually a good degree of thought amongst the madness, and an overabundance of genuine feeling.

That does not mean that the arguments the film makes so fervently are necessarily accurate, but it goes to very extreme places in a wholehearted way that most films are afraid to—and, as “mother!”s box office returns indicate, seemingly for good reason. So you might love “mother!” or hate it or end up feeling any other of number ways, but you will not feel indifferent. I, for one, am much happier to take that gamble walking into a film than the low-risk low-reward scenario of tepid, CGI-laden mediocrity that major films much more often provide.

But this still has not addressed the question of what “mother!” is about. Well, as I mentioned before, it more or less touches on this, that and everything with an equally wide range of allegorical reference points—though the Bible and writer/director Darren Aronofsky’s personal life are definitely the two largest—but the basic setup is this: brooding poet Javier Bardem and his much younger wife Jennifer Lawrence live in a large, beautiful house in the middle of absolutely nowhere. Their relationship is depressingly staid and ‘the great writer’ has a serious case of writer’s block, until one day Ed Harris shows up thinking their house is a bed and breakfast, and things quickly spiral into a madness perhaps best described as “The Giving Tree” on an acid trip. The characters do not have actual names, and you will almost certainly laugh at least once—not because the film is humorous, but because you have no idea how else to react.

If you want to be creeped out by a murdering clown that has been around since the ’80s, go see “It.” If you want to see a bloated action sequel that is inferior to its predecessor in every way except budget, yet still moderately entertaining, go see “Kingsman: The Golden Circle.” But if you are up for something different and are willing to make a little bit of a gamble, give “mother!” a try.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleEd Skrein demonstrates how stopping Hollywood whitewashing can be as simple as saying “No”
Next articleiPhone 8, 8 Plus, X could limit efficiency, security

You may also like

Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester

Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart

“Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top