facebook icon facebook icon facebook icon
  • About
  • ADS
  • Masthead
    • Editorial Board
  • Submission
  • Subscribe
The Wellesley News -
  • News
    • Contract ratified by Wellesley’s Maintenance and Service Employees Union
      Contract ratified by Wellesley’s Maintenance and Service Employees Union
    • News in Brief
      News in Brief
    • Wellesley adapts to end of race conscious admissions
      Wellesley adapts to end of race conscious admissions
    • Senate Report
    • News in Brief
  • Features
    • Professor Spotlight: Dr. Faisal Ahmed
      Professor Spotlight: Dr. Faisal Ahmed
    • Spotlight: New Professor Kathryn Winner
      Spotlight: New Professor Kathryn Winner
    • Spotlight: New Professor Lucia Nhamo ’11
      Spotlight: New Professor Lucia Nhamo ’11
    • Humans of Wellesley
    • Archives
  • Opinions
    • France’s Abaya Ban Unveils Its Own Misogyny
      France’s Abaya Ban Unveils Its Own Misogyny
    • Editorial: In defense of affirmative action
      Editorial: In defense of affirmative action
    • I am an NCAA champion: we should end college recruiting
      I am an NCAA champion: we should end college recruiting
    • Editorials
    • Letters to Editors
  • Arts
    • The SAG-AFTRA and WGA Strikes: What’s happening in Hollywood?
      The SAG-AFTRA and WGA Strikes: What’s happening in Hollywood?
    • Digging into Hozier’s Unreal Unearth: “De Selby (Part 1)” and the Population of Loss
      Digging into Hozier’s Unreal Unearth: “De Selby (Part 1)” and the Population of Loss
    • Summer Releases to Help Usher in Fall
      Summer Releases to Help Usher in Fall
  • Sports
    • Gauff and Richardson Shatter Expectations
      Gauff and Richardson Shatter Expectations
    • Student Athlete of the Month: Kennedy Mayo
      Student Athlete of the Month: Kennedy Mayo
    • No image
      What even is a BORG and why does it matter?
  • Multimedia
    • Photo of the Week
      Photo of the Week
    • “Stronger Together” Rally with Chelsea Clinton
      “Stronger Together” Rally with Chelsea Clinton
    • College Government Vice President 2016 End of the Year Report
      College Government Vice President 2016 End of the Year Report
    • Podcasts
    • The Wellesley Snooze
  • Projects
      • The News in Conversation
    • About
      • Contact
      • Join the News
      • Masthead
      • Editorial Board
    By Christine Arumainayagam OpinionsSeptember 29, 2017

    Slang should be adopted into newer versions of dictionary

    Photo courtesy of Keith Brofsky/Getty Images

    Merriam-Webster, now almost 200 years old, is one of America’s most popular dictionaries. This September, their editors announced that they have added more than 250 words to the dictionary— a modest addition compared to last February’s 1,000 new words.

    The new words from this month range from ‘froyo’ to ‘pregame’ to ‘alt-right.’ Many of these new words will be met with raised eyebrows. Whenever new words are added to the dictionary—especially slang words—there’s always backlash from older generations that would rather dig their heels in the past and cleanse the English language of impurities. These people may think that our language is regressing.

    But as Merriam-Webster wisely states on their website, “As always, the expansion of the dictionary mirrors the the expansion of the language.” If a word becomes popular, there’s no reason it shouldn’t be included in the dictionary, even if some believe that slang doesn’t have a place there. The dictionary isn’t forcing people to use those words. It’s merely providing a tool to understand them.

    Adding new words to the dictionary is not a simple process. Editors, or lexicographers, of any dictionary keep a close eye on language trends. When they notice a word surging in popularity, they take note. Lexicographers spend hours reading various published materials, including books, magazines and websites. When they notice that a new word is becoming popular, they put the word into a ling system that includes the spelling, the context and the citations. Merriam-Webster’s ling system began as early as the 1880s.

    But popularity isn’t the only criterion; to be added to the dictionary, words must be used across a wide variety of sources over an extended period of time. There is no specific number of citations or a specific length of time that must pass, as the lexicographers make decisions on a case-by-case basis.

    Sometimes new words are connected to current events and die off fairly quickly. Sometimes the words have been around for a while, and just haven’t gotten the stamp of approval yet. Often, new words reflect advancing technology, and sometimes they’re clearly born from the internet—like the word ‘troll,’ for instance. Some recent additions include the words ‘selfie’ and ‘binge-watch.’ These words have become incorporated into our everyday speech, so it only makes sense that we should be able to find them in the dictionary.

    Merriam-Webster even has a separate page called “New Words & Slang” for user-submitted words that haven’t quite emerged from the fringes and into everyday use, or that haven’t yet passed through the necessary research stages to allow them to take their spot in the dictionary. Examples of these include ‘woot’ and ‘ginormous.’

    When people police words, or ridicule people for not using ‘proper English,’ we head down a slippery slope. Is there really a single correct way to speak English? That belief can lead to classism, because not everyone in America lives in a white, upper-middle-class suburb. Distinct words and phrases can emerge from communities that don’t fall into this category, and there isn’t a good reason why one way of speaking should be considered superior to the other.

    Words can acquire alternate meanings as people stray from dictionary definitions. Take the word ‘literally,’ for example. I’ve met people who are outraged about sentences such as: ‘I’m literally going to explode.’ They’d most likely be outraged if they knew that this second usage of the word ‘literally’ has become so common that it has found its way into the pages of Merriam-Webster.

    Some want the dictionary to remain stagnant. But English is always evolving—perhaps much faster than ever before now that the majority of us have access to the internet. Additionally, English has the highest population of non-native speakers. Incorporating new words and phrases into dictionaries and our own vocabularies certainly isn’t a new phenomenon.

    Personally, I want to be able to look up the definition word up in Merriam-Webster without having to resort to the utter mayhem that is Urban Dictionary, where anyone can invent a new word out of the blue. It’s hard to tell which definitions actually represent the way the word is used and which ones are just pulling your leg (you might be interested to take a look at the most popular definition of ‘wellesley’).

    Our language shapes the dictionary, not the other way around. The only reason your favorite historical figure wouldn’t have used the word ‘binge-watch’ was because Net ix didn’t exist yet. If language didn’t evolve, we’d all still be grunting and pointing.

    Share on

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Google +
    • LinkedIn
    • Email
    Previous articleHarvard fails to live up to mission by rescinding fellowship to Chelsea Manning
    Next articleU.S economic growth is aided by immigrant jobs

    You may also like

    France’s Abaya Ban Unveils Its Own Misogyny

    Editorial: In defense of affirmative action

    I am an NCAA champion: we should end college recruiting

    4 Comments

    • Mommy says:
      May 7, 2018 at 4:59 PM

      Its huge change in language in no time since 20th century.New Slang words are coming in and going out so quick that with in years rooftop to underground.

      Reply
    • poop says:
      December 16, 2019 at 3:03 PM

      incredibly inaccurate bioch

      Reply
    • Your mom says:
      December 16, 2019 at 3:07 PM

      John I told you not to post on this website any more it’s dangerous plus you’re grounded for the bad word momma sees all remember that next time.

      Reply
    • poop says:
      December 17, 2019 at 2:05 PM

      fuck you

      Reply

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    The Wellesley News

      SECTIONS

    • News
    • Features
    • Opinions
    • Arts
    • Sports
    • Multimedia
    • Projects
    • About

      ABOUT

    • Contact
    • Join the News
    • Masthead
    • Editorial Board

      RESOURCES

    • Advertising
    • Submission
    • Subscribe

      CONTACT US

    • Contact
    COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS