• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
      Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
    • Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
      Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
    • Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health
      Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • The block system is a joke
      The block system is a joke
    • Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
      Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
      Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
    • Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
      Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
    • “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
      “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • No image
      Maintaining wellness as the cold sets in
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Samantha Churchill OpinionsNovember 8, 2017

EPA scientists cannot serve government properly when barred from presenting ndings

Photo courtesy of Aaron P. Golstein/Getty Images

Wellesley students have a long, proud history of public service, but in the current political climate it has become increasingly clear that, for scientists as well as other professionals, working for government agencies is no longer the most effective way to serve the public. A few weeks ago, several Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) scientists were barred from presenting at a conference in Providence, RI regarding the Narragansett Bay Estuary Program. These scientists were originally supposed to discuss a report that analyzed the effects of climate change on sea level, ocean and air temperature and fish populations. One scientist was set to give the keynote address at one workshop and was forced to cancel his speaking engagement only a few days before the conference. Many scientists and democratic members of Congress have expressed outrage at what they have justifiably deemed an act of scientific censorship. The Trump administration has made a point of minimizing and even denying the scientifically proven effects of climate change, but this does not give them license to unilaterally control which data is presented and discussed.

The decision to block these scientists from presenting their findings came from the EPA headquarters in Washington which is run by administrator Scott Pruitt. Pruitt was appointed by President Trump and has also rejected the scientific consensus on climate change. Additionally, Pruitt sued the EPA to challenge the Cross State Air Pollution Rule less than three years ago. While it may initially seem nonsensical to appoint a climate change denier to head the EPA, it is exactly what we should expect from this administration. Trump’s campaign was not based on carefully crafted policies to address national issues, but rather on the exploitation of feelings. Any facts that did not t the narrative he was trying to tell were casually dismissed as “fake news.” Under Pruitt’s leadership the Trump administration has the power to suppress any scientific findings that come out of the EPA that do not t the beliefs of the administration.

Many partisan issues are a question of what the ideal outcome of any given policy should be. In most cases, the two major parties have very different ideas of what an ideal immigration, welfare or abortion policy would look like, and they have different ideas about the best way to implement those policies. But in most of these cases, both sides can generally agree that there is an issue that needs to be addressed. Climate change differs from many of these highly partisan issues in that we cannot even agree that it is a real issue, much less what the best way to solve it might be. The rest of the world has not only agreed that climate change is a real problem, but they have also settled on what they believe is the best way to address it by signing the Paris Climate Accord. Now that Nicaragua and Syria have both signed the treaty, the U.S. has become the sole holdout.

Despite the fact that there is a sweeping consensus in the scientific community, many conservatives still deny the validity of climate change. By not allowing EPA scientists to present their findings the Trump administration has demonstrated its willingness to compromise the integrity of the EPA for the sake of the administration’s agenda. In theory, the EPA, which was founded by republican Richard Nixon, is supposed to be a nonpartisan agency with a primary mission to protect human and environmental health, but that becomes difficult to do when scientists are barred from discussing their findings. This administration has a tendency to ignore the urgings of experts in favor of pursuing policy that is inconsequential or even dangerous, but that makes their supporters feel heard. Sometimes we forget that the U.S. is in fact not a pure democracy but rather a democratic republic. This means

that we elect representatives to look after our interests and craft policy on issues that are much too large or complex for the average person to make an informed decision on. The purpose of agencies like the EPA is to provide the government with the necessary information it needs to make informed decisions. But when these findings fall on deaf ears, it leaves many scientists justifiably outraged.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleMulticultural requirement must be de ned and expanded to t needs of students
Next articleLetter to the Editor

You may also like

A piece of pizza missing topings.

Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?

The block system is a joke

Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top