• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
      Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
    • It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
      It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
    • What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
      What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • No image
      Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy
    • No image
      Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand
    • Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
      Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
      Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
    • Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
      Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
    • The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
      The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Shreya Parjan Sports and WellnessNovember 8, 2017

Under the flag, under the helmet: the validity of athlete voices in political protest

Many professional athletes have used their platform to express their political views to fans across the country in the last few months, including protests during the national anthem. Anthem protests allow the athlete to make a public stand and discuss their opinions in the media.

Title 36 of the United States Code outlines conduct for patriotic observances, noting that “All persons present should face the flag and stand at attention with their right hand over the heart.” Given this specification, playing the anthem before a televised football game is an inherently political act, unalienable from the context in which it takes place.

Similarly, Title 4 of the code dictates position and display of the flag, and a recurring theme in Section M is respect in cases of national tragedy, specifically when they involve key political figures. On Sept. 25, The New York Times published an op-ed by Eric Reid, one of Colin Kaepernick’s teammates on the San Francisco 49ers.

Reid expressed what caused him to join Kaepernick after bearing witness to continued oppression of people of color, “thinking our position was like a flag flown at half-mast to mark a tragedy.” He emphasized, much as the United States Code does, that he chose to kneel “because it’s a respectful gesture.”

Ultimately, the #TakeAKnee protests are not unique to any particular sport, event or political administration. Always and inherently about disparity across racial categories, the protests denounce the continuous ignorance that we are unable to move beyond as a nation and that silences the demands for equality posed by minority groups and individuals.

This is not the first time that issues of racial oppression have entered sports. In 1968, Tommie Smith and John Carlos gave a now iconic black power salute from their podiums at the Summer Olympics. Officials on the International Olympic Committee were quick to expel them from the event. In 1973, black collegiate athletes at Nassau Coliseum on Long Island refused to get off the ground during the national anthem, incurring racialized epithets from spectators. In 1996, the NBA suspended Denver Nuggets player Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf for not standing for the “nationalistic ideology” promoted by the anthem.

Despite this continuity, the criticism of political protest by athletes and public figures has taken a new form, with President Donald Trump encouraging NFL owners to ‘Get that son of a b**** off the field right now,’ in response to protesting players. Rather than addressing the concerns raised by athletes like Kaepernick and Reid, Trump sanitizes the issue, manipulating their actions to exacerbate polarization in our already divided nation. An HBO Sports poll indicates a recent increase in Democrats who support peaceful national anthem protests and  a decrease in support from Republicans.

Trump’s public statements denying the issue’s connection to race and the promptness with which he insulted athlete protesters compared to his delayed response to neo-Nazis in Charlottesville reflect an unwillingness and inability to transition from the bully pulpit to the ‘responsive elected official’ necessity of the presidency. Punishing athletes for exercising their free speech.

Athletes participating in the #TakeAKnee protests, the majority of whom are black, have been criticized for everything from being overpaid and conceited to displaying unwarranted ingratitude with disrespect towards the flag. But what goes unrecognized is that when their actions are televised nationwide, they transcend the individual actor. When a figure within an American cultural institution like the NFL participates in an act of protest, it’s for those who aren’t idolized or given national platforms to express their realities, to stand unified with those who otherwise go unseen.

Charles Thomson, secretary of the Continental Congress, described the symbolism of the American flag as follows: “White signifies purity and innocence, Red, hardiness and valour, and Blue… signifies vigilance, perseverance and  justice.” How, then, can we defend the flag while attacking the values of the very people it represents? Their innocence continues to be criminalized, their valor goes unrecognized and their calls for justice are unanswered.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleWellesley Crew Prepares for Head of the Charles
Next articleWellesley athletic community takes strides in mental health awareness

You may also like

Student-Athlete of October

Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022

The Case for Body Neutrality

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top