• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
      Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
    • It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
      It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
    • What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
      What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • No image
      Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy
    • No image
      Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand
    • Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
      Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
      Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
    • Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
      Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
    • The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
      The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Ahilya Mehta OpinionsNovember 29, 2017

Republican tax cuts seek to aid corporate interests, while hurting majority of Americans

If the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act does not pass by the end of the year, it will be disastrous for the Trump administration. While President Trump could have focused on bipartisan issues such as infrastructure, he instead chose to focus on extremely partisan and highly controversial issues such as health care and tax reform. President Trump’s efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act were embarrassingly unsuccessful. If this tax reform bill does not pass, President Trump will have nothing to show for his first year in office.

With this in mind, is it even necessary for President Trump to pass a tax reform bill? The new reforms proposed will eventually negatively affect the American middle class. The House of Representatives has already passed its version of the tax reform bill. In order to make this bill a part of ongoing legislation, the Senate needs to pass the exact same bill that the House did. However, the bills that the Senate and House have put forward seem to vary greatly. Moreover, the House’s passing of the tax reform bill reeked of desperation. The House tax bill, which was over 400 pages long, was not reviewed at a single House hearing prior to being passed, which happened against the wishes of 13 Republicans and all Democrats in the House. Unlike in the House, the Senate can only afford to lose the support of two Republicans, assuming the Democrats will be unified in their efforts to shut down the Senate tax bill.

The House bill has chosen to simplify the tax code by collapsing the seven tax brackets to four tax brackets: 12 percent, 25 percent, 35 percent and 39.6 percent. These tax brackets are representative of the different income levels and how much tax an individual with a particular income has to pay, according to the tax bracket they fall under. The Senate bill, however, has chosen to remain with the original seven-tax-bracket system (12 percent, 22 percent, 24 percent, 32 percent, 35 percent and 38.5 percent for high-income individuals and married couples). Simplifying the tax code is, in theory, a good concept because people will better understand how their money is being used. That being said, simplifying the tax brackets will only be harmful to the American middle class because a tax bracket is representative of the percentage rate one pays when they fall within an income bracket range. With more tax brackets, people are able to pay taxes that more accurately reflect their income. For example, it would not be ideal to tax someone who earns $20,000 annually the same as someone who earns $60,000 annually.

Additionally, the House and Senate tax bills differ in the time in which they are in effect. The House bill wants to make tax cuts for corporations and individuals permanent, whereas the Senate wants to implement the corporate tax cuts by 2019 and ensure that the individual tax cuts expire by 2025. The Senate bill also attempts to repeal the Affordable Care Act, thereby saving $300 billion but also taking away health insurance from millions of Americans. The House bill does not include this provision; however, it could be easily added.

The Senate and House bills do coincide on several issues. The mortgage interest deduction from $1 million to $500,000 would definitely be a big win for both the House and Senate Republicans. Similarly, the Republicans are united in their efforts to give small businesses a tax break so that they have better chances of success.

Both these tax reform bills have one thing very much in common: they hurt blue states much more than they do red ones. As Daniel Donovan, a Republican congressman from Staten Island, said, “There was a study showing four states will end up paying 16  billion dollars more in taxes, and 46 states will pay less.” Donovan added, “Those states are New York, New Jersey, California and Maryland. Those are the people that are subsidizing this tax break for the rest of America.” Moreover, this tax bill could have the most overwhelming impact on the middle class American taxpayer in every state. This would happen as a result of the elimination of personal exemption, where the money a family is allowed to deduct from their income corresponds to the number of taxpayers and dependents claimed. At present, married couples can deduct approximately $4,000 from their taxable income per family member. The elimination of personal exemptions will cause $1.6 trillion in tax increases over the next decade.

Michael Linden, a tax-policy fellow at the Roosevelt Institute, has studied the tax legislation in detail. Linden told Sheelah Kolhatkar from The New Yorker that “it is a flat-out lie that everyone gets a tax cut. There will be people who pay more in taxes in every state, in every district. The reddest state in the country, and the reddest district in that state, will have people who pay more in taxes.” Michael Linden is just one of the many scholars in this field who emphasize the need to adjust the tax system, but not in the way that the Republicans have put forward. Yes, we do need to simplify our tax code. It will definitely make it easier for the average American to understand and to incorporate. However, simplifying the tax code does not necessarily mean making it fundamentally more harmful for the average American taxpayer, and that is what this tax reform bill does.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleWellesley needs to encourage constructive discourse on controversial topics
Next articleVisitors to Dubai must educate themselves about the emirate’s laws

You may also like

Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification

It’s time to put traditional grading to the test

Banner reading this website has been seized over images of a book shelf

What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?

1 Comment

  • Carl Hardwick says:
    December 2, 2017 at 8:48 AM

    The Republicans are hell bent on saving the upper crust and squeezing the life out of middle-income Americans. Protecting the wealthy and aiding corporations first seems to be the Republican way. We’ll see if their actions to help corporate America will actually produce the number of jobs needed that have decent wages and benefits. When President Trump, on his campaign of dread, said he was going to bring jobs back to America, we’ll, we haven’t really seen this his first year, which has been riddled with scandal and so many probes into the possible Russian connection. If the Republicans continue hurting middle America and the poor, they’re going to destroy our country with their agendas. Is this the America we all want and is the American dream being choked to death even further? Very sad day for all of us. It’s time to ouster many of the Republicans when we vote, as they do not have the majority of Americans interest at heart.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top