• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
      Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
    • Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age
      Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age
    • Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation
      Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Controversial
      The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Controversial
    • Lucy Dacus Brings a Minimal Yet Powerful Performance to Northeastern University
      Lucy Dacus Brings a Minimal Yet Powerful Performance to Northeastern University
    • “Glass Onion” Takes Shots at Easy Targets
      “Glass Onion” Takes Shots at Easy Targets
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Rejected Snooze Articles for the Week
      Rejected Snooze Articles for the Week
    • Happy Valentine’s Day from Spog
      Happy Valentine’s Day from Spog
    • The Four Best Places to Loudly FaceTime Someone on Campus
      The Four Best Places to Loudly FaceTime Someone on Campus
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Jacqueline Sanchez OpinionsMarch 6, 2019

“Wellesley Uncensored Confessions” only serves to harm students

In my first semester of college, the fall of 2015, I was a big user of Yik-Yak, an app that let participants read and post anonymous comments visible to people within a range of a few miles. The use of the app died down nationwide once it became unanonymous in my sophomore year, and has since shut down entirely. Nevertheless, the anonymity it provided people made it a very popular online platform for a few years.  

When I first arrived at Wellesley, I was struck by the guarded and measured tones that many students spoke with, in and out of class. These were not negative traits to me, but very different from the mostly unthought-out flow of words that I was used to hearing from my high school peers. Thus, Yik-Yak appealed to me because, as I read people’s anonymous posts, I thought I was finally finding out what college was like “uncensored.”

Now, in the spring semester of my senior year, another anonymous forum has become popular at Wellesley, and I cringe at the viewpoints I had as a younger student regarding Yik-Yak. Reading through the “Wellesley Uncensored Confessions” page on Facebook oftentimes leaves me feeling uncomfortable and frustrated, mostly because the platform’s anonymity lends itself to problematic posting by students confident that the comment will not be traced to them.

Like Yik-Yak, many of the posts on the now quasi-infamous Facebook page are racist, misogynistic, transphobic and ableist. Because anyone in the world with access to Facebook can use “Wellesley Uncensored Confessions,” even outsiders of the Wellesley community can use the page to spread their hateful beliefs, all with the ease of not having their name attached to the post. For example, one particularly frightening incel posted about their hatred for women a few months ago, lamenting that women have “replaced God” in today’s society.

Others use the page to attack students. One of two rules on the page is “Don’t call out individual people by name if [you’re] dragging them,” yet there have been many instances in which students have been called out on the page, if not by name, then by other traits that are easily identifiable such as their position within a organization. Many posts calling out individual students have not been removed, and it’s unclear what does warrant the removal of a post.

People also use the page to talk about their mental health problems. They graphically discuss how terrible Wellesley makes them feel. These are the users that I am the most concerned about. Using an anonymous forum like “Wellesley Uncensored Confessions,” while giving people a place to vent their emotions, provides no concrete help, save that of any caring (yet for the most part unqualified) commenters who choose to reach out.

Indeed, these types of comments reveal one of the biggest problems with the confessions page, which is that it overwhelmingly does nothing to help people. People reaching out with problems are not receiving the professional attention that they need. Furthermore, the confessions page in general is doing nothing to help improve the campus culture that it’s tearing down.

Devotees to the page may argue that it is not meant to help people but to provide a platform for people to talk about Wellesley without being censored, and for those interested in reading about what life at Wellesley is like. Yet the page in no way accomplishes these aims, because it does not accurately give an entire picture of what life at Wellesley is like. Instead, it just reflects the worst of it.

In my opinion, the confessions page should be disabled entirely. I believe that as long as people have such a freeform way to spread hate, they will eagerly use it. However, I know that this isn’t a realistic option as long as it has so many supporters.

Instead, users who post on an anonymous page to share their views on race, class, gender and ableism should think about what they want anonymity for, and if they are intentionally spreading hostility to minority groups. People who genuinely have questions about these issues shouldn’t be afraid to attach their names to them.

For people struggling with mental health who are afraid to come forward publicly, the Stone Center or Active Minds could create a separate anonymous forum, and provide informed responses so that those affected can get proper help.

Above all, except when they feel unsafe, people should not turn to anonymity to express their views. Forums like “Wellesley Uncensored Confessions” should be abandoned in favor of outlets where participants are required to disclose their identity, in order to stop the spread of ignorance and hate at the college.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleISIS bride controversy exposes continued British colonialism
Next articleThomas Cushman Letter to the Editor

You may also like

Logos of social media apps such as Twitter, Tiktok, Netflix, Spotify, and Discord.

Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity

Abstract painting of various boxes meant to imply computer and phone screens

Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age

A collection of a wide variety of foods in the colors of the rainbow

Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

  • Stone-Davis dining staff report mistreatment
  • Logos of social media apps such as Twitter, Tiktok, Netflix, Spotify, and Discord. Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
  • The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Contro...
  • A collection of a wide variety of foods in the colors of the rainbow Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflat...
  • Red envelope that contains money to celebrate the Lunar New Year. America’s cultural appropriation is a modern form of i...

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top