• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
      Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
    • Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
      Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
    • Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health
      Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • The block system is a joke
      The block system is a joke
    • Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
      Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
      Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
    • Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
      Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
    • “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
      “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • No image
      Maintaining wellness as the cold sets in
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Kalyani Saxena News, News and FeaturesSeptember 18, 2019

2020 and the World Outside

Photo Courtesy of HuffPost

For all the coverage following the 2020 Democratic candidates’ every move, there seems to be a blind spot regarding foreign policy. Despite the frequent refrain that “the U.S president is the ‘leader of the free world,’” most candidates believe that there is little incentive to frequently discuss foreign policy while campaigning. Everyday Americans are far more likely to worry about issues that they have a direct impact on their everyday life. A candidate can gain more political ground discussing healthcare than they would debating the eighteen-year military quagmire in Afghanistan. It should thus come as little surprise that during the past three rounds of debates, foreign policy has had very little stage time. That said, the few positions that the candidates have outlined serve as an interesting mirror to their national policies. 

 According to Paul Musgrave, a political scientist at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, both Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg are running as the “Obama candidate.” They believe that while the international institutions could use some work, they are for the most part structurally sound. The two are thus likely to work to maintain the delicate balance between existing relationships with foreign countries and addressing pressing crises. For example, according to Al Jazeera, both Biden and Buttigieg refrain from labelling the occupation of the West Bank, a “humanitarian crisis” and instead call for a two-state solution. The similarity between the two candidates comes as somewhat of a surprise considering Buttigieg has frequently positioned himself as the young newcomer with fresh ideas and policies that contrast Biden’s old-fashioned centrism. Despite their differences in domestic policies, it looks like both Biden and Buttigieg are insistent on sitting down and not rocking the boat while abroad. 

On the other side of the political spectrum are Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, who Musgrave says are running as the “progressive candidates.” They both want to pursue foreign policy that reforms international institutions and reduces international insecurity. This is largely consistent with their domestic policies, as Sanders and Warren have said on numerous occasions that they believe structural change is necessary to create a more fair and more equal society. They are thus unafraid to make polarizing statements and disrupt existing ties to U.S. allies. Sanders, for example, responded to Israel’s occupation of the West Bank by suggesting that he would cut U.S military aid to Israel, and then posted a video comparing Israel to apartheid-era South Africa. Politicians of years past would balk at making similar statements, but candidates like Warren and Sanders believe that change cannot happen without drastic action. Interestingly enough, this stance abroad makes them in some respects curiously similar to their Republican opponent, President Donald Trump. Both Sanders and Warren have shown that they are concerned by the threat that trade with China poses to America. Sanders even went further than the president and labelled China as a currency manipulator. Similarly, Warren advocated for aggressive tariffs against the country. This simply goes to show that living under a Warren or Sanders presidency would in many ways be drastically different from the presidency under Trump, but some things may be strikingly similar. When it comes to foreign policy, the labels of progressive and conservative may not be as far apart as we think. 

The world of foreign policy is a different animal from the dominating conversations about the 2020 election. When one takes a closer look at the candidates and their proposals, some find similarities where one would expect there to be none; these unexpected similarities should be troubling to the average American. Without clearly articulated information about foreign policy during debates and rallies. It is difficult to vote for a candidate that fully represents one’s interests. Candidates should also be wary of brushing foreign policy under the rug. Dramatic domestic proposals can help catapult candidates to the presidency, but international failures are more than capable of removing them from office. 

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleHealth Services to be outsourced to Newton-Wellesley Hospital
Next articleClimate Strike

You may also like

Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus

Students attending the puja ceremony

Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali

Changing COVID-19 regulations impact students’ mental health

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top