• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • The Wellesley (COVID) 100
      The Wellesley (COVID) 100
    • In memory of Professor Rebecca Summerhays
      In memory of Professor Rebecca Summerhays
    • Trans flag controversy: College power washes staircase after trans flag is painted over Harry Potter spray paint
      Trans flag controversy: College power washes staircase after trans flag is painted over Harry Potter spray paint
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • The News in Conversation: Wellesley Against Mass Incarceration
      The News in Conversation: Wellesley Against Mass Incarceration
    • Editorial Board calls for keeping up trans flag murals
      Editorial Board calls for keeping up trans flag murals
    • No, Elon Musk’s Twitter will not restore free speech
      No, Elon Musk’s Twitter will not restore free speech
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • Be/longing Centers Connection and Care
      Be/longing Centers Connection and Care
    • No image
      Birds Falling Upwards: Wellesley College Theater’s The Moors is a Must-See
    • No image
      Sometimes you just need to read a YA “Groundhog Day” to feel something
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Health and Wellness
    • February Student Athlete of the Month
      February Student Athlete of the Month
    • Athletics Update
      Athletics Update
    • Victoria Garrick Speaks on Mental Health
      Victoria Garrick Speaks on Mental Health
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Wellesley News Leadership Changes Completely Peacefully Without Any Suspicious Disappearances At All
      Wellesley News Leadership Changes Completely Peacefully Without Any Suspicious Disappearances At All
    • Solve Your Connection Problems With Wellesley Insecure
      Solve Your Connection Problems With Wellesley Insecure
    • Mayhem strikes Wellesley as paper towels removed from campus
      Mayhem strikes Wellesley as paper towels removed from campus
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Shayeza Walid Arts, ReviewsSeptember 18, 2019

“The Goldfinch” fails to please in its attempt to adapt the novel

Photo Courtesy of Warner Bros.

Needless to say, book-to-film adaptations often times fail to do many stories justice. Fans of multiple science fiction trilogies, dystopian novels and romantic comedies (the list is endless) would know. Regretfully, John Crowley’s adaptation of Donna Tartt’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel “The Goldfinch” is an unjust reflection of the complex yet compelling novel that tells the coming of age tale of loss, love, misfortune, and essentially, struggle to find belonging. 

The film depicts the life of a boy named Theo, a New Yorker whose mother is killed by an explosion at the Metropolitan Museum of Art (the MET). The loss of his mother leads to a troubled childhood for the main character, played by Oakes Fegley and later by Ansel Elgort, who has to move from one “home” to another and eventually descends into a world of crime. 

The story is driven through the medium of a small Dutch Golden Age painting called “The Goldfinch” — which Theo picks up after rummaging through the debris of the museum bombing. This painting not only serves as the driving force of the plot, but is also emblematic of Theo’s deceased mother. The main character carries the painting with him everywhere he goes, only to find out after many years and much apprehension that he holds only a replica. As we come to find out alongside Theo, the original painting was stolen by his friend Boris, played adeptly by Finn Wolfhard and later Aneurin Barnard, who he met as a teenager in Nevada. Thus, the film encompasses Theo’s journey to recover the original painting. The painting, however, merely acts as a plot device, dismantling the importance it holds for the character’s love for his mother. 

Although the film dilutes the complexity of the original narrative, it somehow manages to progress on a rollercoaster-like trajectory that often leaves the audience confused. Still, the movie deserves much credit when it comes to the impeccable and lucid cinematography. The artistic portrayal of the film makes one see New York City, where much of the plot takes place, as a warm wonderland where memories are stored and artistic history is nourished. It makes us feel like fleeing to a city, getting lost inside the galleries of the MET, but, oddly, also makes us connect with Theo as though he is a boy we once knew. 

However, despite the masterful camera work and star-studded ensemble cast consisting of  names such as Nicole Kidman, Sarah Paulson, Denis O’Hare, Jeffrey Wright, Ryan Foust and Willa Fitzgerald, the most the film achieves is faint echo of the heartbreaking and powerful journey Theo makes in finding happiness and inner peace as in Tartt’s novel. When watching the film, it is apparent that the director makes a sincere effort to stay faithful to the novel. He attempts to condense the original story and portray all the characters’ nuanced personalities and intense emotional journeys into two and a half hours. The film includes many lines lifted  directly from the original text. Most notably when Theo speaks about his his mother — “When I lost her, I lost sight of any landmark that might have led me some place happier.” This indicates to the audience that Crowley is a fan of the novel like many who’ve read it. The fact remains, however, that being a fan of a piece of art and trying to reproduce it in one’s own way are two very different things. And, inconveniently, it is left to the audience of the “reproduction”  to realize it is not the same as the original work. And that ironically happens to be the case when Theo realises the Goldfinch in his possession is a replica. It is excessive to say that fans of the novel, like myself, feel cheated by a fellow fan, such as the director, like Theo is by Boris in the story, but in this case, the mistake unfortunately is unredeemable. But fan or not, this movie definitely excels in perplexing the audience and there would be a very small niche (if one exists, that is) that viewed the motion picture as any form of golden artwork, with or without its technical brilliance.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous article“Hustlers” toes the line between exploitation and celebration
Next article“It Chapter Two” Fails to Deliver the Scares “It” Promised

You may also like

Be/longing Centers Connection and Care

Birds Falling Upwards: Wellesley College Theater’s The Moors is a Must-See

Sometimes you just need to read a YA “Groundhog Day” to feel something

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2022 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top