• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
      Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
    • Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age
      Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age
    • Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation
      Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Controversial
      The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Controversial
    • Lucy Dacus Brings a Minimal Yet Powerful Performance to Northeastern University
      Lucy Dacus Brings a Minimal Yet Powerful Performance to Northeastern University
    • “Glass Onion” Takes Shots at Easy Targets
      “Glass Onion” Takes Shots at Easy Targets
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
      Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
    • Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
      Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
    • The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
      The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Andreea Sabau OpinionsNovember 20, 2019

2020 presidential candidates, end your bid before you end the country

Photos Courtesy of Associated Press, Getty Images, EPA-Shutterstock

On Nov. 8, congressman and former candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination Beto O’Rourke dropped out of the race. 

I’m sure hardly anyone was surprised by the announcement. With 17 Democratic candidates still in the race — maybe 18 if the rumors about wealthy businessman and former mayor of New York City Michael Bloomberg running are true — pre-nominee proclamations of defeat have only just begun. There are 112 days until Super Tuesday, when most states will hold primary elections; assuming there is only one candidate left in the race by then, someone must drop out every seven days. Given that new presidential campaigns are still being announced, it doesn’t seem like anyone is planning to leave the race anytime soon. This is a problem.

We’ve all heard this before, but it must be said again: the nature of American politics has radically changed since President Donald Trump’s victory. It is evident that his presidency made the expression of white supremacist, sexist, homophobic beliefs much more acceptable to manifest through harmful action, as evidenced by the uptick in hate crimes since 2016. But less obvious have been the ways in which he has legitimized authoritarian tendencies in the United States, such as the “Fifth Avenue argument” his lawyer is making to claim that a sitting US executive is immune from criminal prosecution even if they shoot someone on Fifth Avenue in broad daylight. Clearly, it would be dangerous to settle into a sense of complacency over the “new norm” of politics set by the Trump administration. Silence in the midst of atrocity allows the administration’s policies to disproportionately harm marginalized groups. 

I want to challenge Trump’s abhorrent presidency just as much as the next person. But is joining, or, if your poll numbers are low, staying in the Democratic presidential race the right way to go? 

In past years, there have been far fewer candidates vying for the Democratic presidential nomination: five in 2016, none in 2012, nine in 2008, ten in 2004 and two in 2000. The party  should have learned from the 2016 Republican presidential nominee field, which, at its peak — a bit over a year before the general election — contained 17 candidates. We all know how well that race went: Trump’s personality outdid the qualifications of other notable candidates, such as Senator Ted Cruz and former Governor of Ohio John Kasich, leading him to victory. 

Beyond political tradition, however, is the real-world impact of having a crowded 2020 election field. The tensions produced from this overcrowding are evident in the Democratic debates. For example, on Oct. 15, O’Rourke and Mayor Pete Buttigieg warred over gun control, a topic that the Democratic party — particularly its voters — generally agrees upon. The two got into a nasty fight after Buttigieg expressed skepticism about O’Rourke’s plan to buy back assault weapons.

Would this situation have occurred if there had been three to five people on the stage instead? It’s possible, but it is far more likely that debate discordance on common partisan stances is solely an attempt by candidates to stand out on an overcrowded stage. My interpretation of some of the sharpest attacks in the debates is that candidates, desperate for a surge in the polls, tend to go for soundbite quotes most likely to be replayed on news channels and other media. As a result, debates have become messy, unfocused and generally unpleasant to watch. Many voters rely on watching debates to get a feel for the candidates and develop an informed vote by Super Tuesday. How can voters decide on a candidate when debates are so disorganized and discordant? 

On their official website, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) claims: “Democrats have a moral imperative to win back the presidency in 2020.” However, when candidates are relying on ad hominem attacks to gain notoriety, it creates a level of disunity that deters voters from core partisan beliefs listed by the DNC, such as health care as a basic human right, preventing gun violence and equality for marginalized groups. Now, with the crowded 2020 field, voters focus on which candidate “wins” each debate — or, which candidate delivers the most polished attacks — instead of candidates’ policies. This attitude erodes the idea of elected officials actually representing constituents’ interests, threatening the core of the United States’ so-called representative democracy.

Beating Trump in 2020 is Democratic candidates’ main priority, plastered on most major campaign websites. Many Americans may identify with this sentiment and support this ultimate goal. Victory seems unlikely, however, if the large pool of candidates and split voter base remains. This overcrowding enables more constituents to devote themselves to candidates unlikely to win the nomination, and the divisive nature of subsequent debates encourages voter proclamations like “my candidate or bust.” The broad and subjective notion of “electability” should not necessarily play a role in which Democratic presidential candidate voters like myself choose to support, but with such a large pool of candidates, concerns over electability might be valid.

To be representative of voters’ interests, only the top four candidates — Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg — need to stick around for the next debate and onward. Imagine if previous Democratic debates presented only these four candidates and how much more information voters would get out of watching. I am talking to you: Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Andrew Yang, Amy Klobuchar, Tulsi Gabbard, Tom Steyer and more. Drop out of the race before the Democrats hand victory to Trump yet again.

 

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleClarifying the Wellesley College residential life compensation policy
Next articleThe case against X markers

You may also like

Logos of social media apps such as Twitter, Tiktok, Netflix, Spotify, and Discord.

Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity

Abstract painting of various boxes meant to imply computer and phone screens

Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age

A collection of a wide variety of foods in the colors of the rainbow

Let them eat bread: the unequal effects of food price inflation

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

  • Stone-Davis dining staff report mistreatment
  • Logos of social media apps such as Twitter, Tiktok, Netflix, Spotify, and Discord. Andrew tate: ending the cycle of toxic masculinity
  • The 95th Academy Awards Nominations: The Cool and The Contro...
  • Abstract painting of various boxes meant to imply computer and phone screens Turn it off: healing from news fatigue in the digital age
  • Red envelope that contains money to celebrate the Lunar New Year. America’s cultural appropriation is a modern form of i...

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top