• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Four Cases of COVID-19 Reported During Winter Break
      Four Cases of COVID-19 Reported During Winter Break
    • Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
      Students With Medically Restricted Diets Struggle to Eat On Campus
    • Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
      Students find new ways to celebrate Diwali
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
      Wellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?
    • The block system is a joke
      The block system is a joke
    • Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
      Spineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
      Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester
    • Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
      Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart
    • “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
      “Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
  • Health and Wellness
    • No image
      Athletic impacts of Covid-19
    • No image
      A new kind of PE
    • No image
      Maintaining wellness as the cold sets in
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • Miscellanea
    • No image
      Remote students experience existential crises; change class years in email signatures
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
      Your next on-campus romance isn’t going to work out
    • The Artichoke
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Avalon Swanson Arts, Arts In The NewsMarch 5, 2020

Bob Iger Steps Down as CEO of Disney: A Look into the Company’s Past and Future

Pictured here at the Avengers: Endgame premiere, Disney CEO steps down from his position Photo Courtesy of Indiewire

On Tuesday, Bob Iger announced that he is stepping down from his role as the CEO of Disney to a less demanding position as executive chairman of the company. But before I discuss the future of Disney, I’d like to give some background on the company’s past. 

Micheal Eisner, who served as Disney’s CEO from 1984 to 2005, once famously wrote:

“We have no obligation to make art. We have no obligation to make history. We have no obligation to make a statement. But to make money, it is often important to make history, to make art, or to make some significant statement … In order to make money, we must always make entertaining movies, and if we make entertaining movies, at times we will reliably make history, art, a statement, or all three.”

These words were circulated around the Hollywood community and inevitably trickled down to Eisner’s protege and eventual replacement, Bob Iger. He took these words as gospel. Over Iger’s 14 years as CEO of Disney, the company has pursued aggressive, high-risk acquisitions that include the acclaimed Pixar Studios, a majority stake in the streaming giant Hulu, LucasFilm, Marvel Entertainment and, most recently, 20th Century Studios. As of 2020, 13 out of the top 20 grossing films of all time were made under Iger’s tenure, including smash hits like “Frozen” and “Avengers: Endgame.” Iger’s time as head of Disney marked an incredibly profitable period for the company and its investors. 

Iger’s replacement, Bob Chapek, has worked at Disney for over 27 years. He formerly had the position of Chairman of Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, where he supervised projects like the new Star Wars: Galaxy’s Edge themepark and the rebranding of the classic Disneyland ride Tower of Terror into Guardians of the Galaxy – Mission: BREAKOUT! This controversial decision angered many diehard Disney Parks fans, who thought Chapek was throwing away Disneyland’s history in favor of profits. This all begs the question: what does a Disney monopoly mean for the art of film and animation? 

Remember Eisner’s words at the beginning of this article: “We have no obligation to make art. We have no obligation to make history. We have no obligation to make a statement.” Over the past decade, Disney has banked on nostalgia by reliably producing a live-action remake of a beloved Disney animated film every six months or so. These films are incredibly profitable: 2019’s “The Lion King” made over $1.657 billion in the box office alone. However, do these remakes actually add anything new to film as a medium? Will they last in the public consciousness? In my opinion, no. Disney is just repackaging old stories and wrapping them in a shiny, woke bow to make them more palatable for modern audiences. Disney has no obligation to make art; Disney has no obligation to make history. Disney’s only obligation and goal is to make money. 

However, I would argue that the jig is up. Audiences and critics are beginning to turn to new sources for their entertainment. I don’t think that it is a coincidence that a South Korean film, “Parasite,” swept the stubbornly Eurocentric Oscars and countless other American awards. In 2019, Sony’s film “Spider-man: Into the Spider-Verse” introduced groundbreaking animation styles and techniques that propelled it to an Oscar win over two Disney-Pixar franchise sequels, “Incredibles 2” and “Ralph Breaks the Internet.” Although Pixar’s “Toy Story 4” secured the win for Animated Feature Film in 2020, “Frozen 2” wasn’t even nominated for an Academy Award. Notably, three movies from smaller studios, “Klaus,” “I Lost My Body” and “Missing Link,” were given nominations instead. 

Bob Iger has built a strong and stable legacy at Disney, and Bob Chapek will reliably follow in his footsteps. What this means is a future of mostly sequels and live action remakes: a stagnant time for the art of film at Disney. However, as a lover of film and animation, I hope that Disney will prove me wrong and begin to produce films with the intention of making something truly revolutionary, not just palatable. 

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleThe Photograph: Film Review
Next articleEmma offers a new perspective on Austen’s most unlikable heroine

You may also like

Music Performance Courses Adapt to an Altered Semester

Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of “Rebecca” fails to deliver compared to its classic counterpart

“Dash & Lily” Find Love, Stranded

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2021 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top