• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
      Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
    • It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
      It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
    • What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
      What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • No image
      Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy
    • No image
      Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand
    • Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
      Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
      Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
    • Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
      Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
    • The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
      The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Nyana Cheng Wright OpinionsDecember 6, 2020

The block system is a joke

Photo Courtesy of the Wellesley News

The block system has been an absolute failure in the midst of COVID-19.

I, along with many other First-years who arrived in August, was assured that I would have a “social block” and be able to make friends outside of my living block. Both assumptions were proven wrong. The reasoning behind the block system is that it should limit contact and make contact tracing easier, as students have a sort of “family” on campus. However, what happens if you are not part of that family?

One of the first things everyone tells you when you go to college is that the people you are friends with in the first week will not be your friends later on. The block system assumes this is not true, to our detriment. One student who wished to remain anonymous because of the added pressure of block drama said, “I had an argument with my block, and I now have no friends, because it’s hard to make friends when everyone else has a friend group.” 

The block system has made Wellesley incredibly cliquish, and this is not a unique story. Students who are not instant friends with their blocks are stuck making an impossible decision: they must either disregard the college’s COVID rules or isolate themselves completely.

One First-year was randomly placed in a two-person block instead of the usual four to six-person block. When she found out about her unusually small block before moving on campus, she contacted residential life and expressed her concern over the lack of social contact a two-person block entails. Their response was that she “would be able to interact and eat with anyone [she] wanted to”. 

Given the rules we’ve been operating on this was never true, and has become less so with updates, and the new rules. If anything, it’s become harder to “interact and eat with anyone”. This student’s only blockmate went home for Thanksgiving, meaning that she is living in a block of one for her last three weeks on campus. For any student, this would be extremely isolating. The first semester of college is hard for most people, and college-enforced solitude makes it even worse.  

In the absence of in-person, college-sponsored social gatherings and club meetings, eating is one of the few things that students can do with their friends. However, students are supposed to only eat with blockmates. If you are not friends with your blockmates or they are busy, you are supposed to always eat alone. When you sign into dining halls, you are supposed to affirm that you are eating with blockmates. 

As of November 13th, there is a tentative meal block system, but it isn’t very accessible and has been presented as intended for students in small blocks of two or three. This only helps a small group of students, as those with blocks of five or six can’t easily access the program. It also assumes that isolated students have had the opportunity to make new friends. Even if a student is mildly interested in the program, they still have to email student housing. It isn’t an easily accessible system. Thus, students aren’t very likely to use it even if they can.

Given that most students regularly eat outside of their blocks, many do not sign into dining hall contact tracing systems. Or, they choose to eat in common spaces other than the dining halls, spaces that provide less social distance and do not have contact tracing. If anything, these college rules on the dining system make Wellesley students more at risk for COVID.

Like many other students, I do not interact with my blockmates at all. Yet, if one of them tested positive for COVID I would go into quarantine automatically. This is absolutely ridiculous. We are in the middle of a mental health crisis as well as a viral one, and quarantine should only happen when necessary.

Part of the reasoning the administration has given us for the block system is the shared use of facilities. Each block is assigned a set of one toilet, one sink, and one shower. Several blocks are assigned to each bathroom. Once again, this does not make any sense. I regularly go into the bathroom and see someone from another block brushing their teeth (mask off, of course). I am much more likely to get COVID from brushing my teeth right next to someone from another block than from someone from my block who is using the same toilet. If I tested positive, it would make more sense to quarantine the other two blocks that use my bathroom than to only quarantine my own block. Most of the concern over the use of public toilets is due to the airborne nature of COVID, not butt to butt contact.

There are communal bathrooms in academic buildings and some of the dorms, but no contract tracing is employed for these bathrooms. If the reasoning that led admin to make blocks use the same toilet holds true this should be a public safety hazard, but it is not. Furthermore, many times you cannot use the nearest dorm bathroom because of the block system. As a First-year who did not start figuring out where the communal bathrooms are until very recently, I have regularly chosen to simply hold it rather than walk fifteen minutes to my dorm. This just encourages a UTI.

COVID regulations on campus have loosened, and now we are allowed to have up to two blockmates in our rooms at a time. While this is clearly too little too late considering the damaging isolation imposed on us during the first half of the semester, it is also too late in terms of student habits. By over-regulating students, the school is almost encouraging students to break the rules. It is a well-known idea that someone who lives in a controlling environment will just get better at lying. Most Wellesley students are cautious and do take the pandemic seriously, but college rules are far past cautious. Students are people, and expecting them to perfectly isolate is just unrealistic.

If students are not friends with their blockmates, rules dictate that they should always eat alone and never socialize in their rooms. This has created a wide divide on campus. There are students who will have one or two friends in their room from outside their blocks and eat with whoever they want. There are also students who are adamant about not breaking the rules and simply do not socialize very often, if at all.

One thing I have noticed is that First-years are much more likely than other students to be extremely cautious. We have never experienced Wellesley without COVID. We are not as likely to smoke with our friends or eat outside of our blocks because many of us just do not have the friends or the habit of on-campus interactions. In the absence of opportunities to meet new friends, First-years are much more isolated than upperclassmen, who have already established friend groups and usually have blocks of close friends.

For some lucky students, most of these are mild concerns, as they are very close with their blockmates. However, we cannot blame students for breaking the rules if their only alternative is complete social isolation. These students are not wildly irresponsible. I don’t know any students who leave campus or throw parties, which would be extremely dangerous. I do know plenty of responsible students who had to choose their mental health over the block system. In President Paula Johnson’s most recent email, she said the rules “are not designed to punish,” but unfortunately that is exactly what they have done.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleSpineless nonpartisanship: how the Girl Scouts convinced me they no longer care about girls
Next articleWellesley, why can’t you meet our dietary needs?

You may also like

Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification

It’s time to put traditional grading to the test

Banner reading this website has been seized over images of a book shelf

What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?

1 Comment

  • Bella says:
    December 9, 2020 at 4:15 PM

    I agree that the block system is a joke, and it lends itself to student isolation or a calculated choice to break the rules. However, I have heard from many on-campus students that there were first years going into Boston via a rented party bus. And a while back I heard of students partying at babson (although I’m not sure of their grade).

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top