• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
      Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
    • It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
      It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
    • What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
      What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • No image
      Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy
    • No image
      Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand
    • Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
      Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
      Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
    • Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
      Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
    • The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
      The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Elizabeth Murno ArtsOctober 23, 2022

The Glorification of Serial Killers

With “Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story”  (2022) starring Evan Peters having launched on Netflix, there has been a discourse about how people fetishize crime and glorify serial killers, such as Dahmer himself. This has been a problem I have seen since Zac Efron played Ted Bundy in 2019 “Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile” (2019). People watched this and sympathized with the Killer, viewing him as funny and attractive. “‘Dahmer”’ poses a different problem, however, that is truly more disturbing. “‘Dahmer”’ is a 10-part series with each episode going into graphic detail and viewing of the way he murdered his victims. One episode for each of the victims Netflix viewed as most dramatic and deserving of the screen. The show is predicated on recreating the most traumatic moments in explicit detail. The series literally takes the stories of how people died and emulated them to make millions of dollars. 

Beyond the series itself, the response to it was shocking. Dahmer’s victim was a black gay man. Reactions from people on social media and speaking on podcasts, mostly straight white women, claimed that the show was not violent enough and  they had no problem watching the graphic murders. They had no stake in the murders because it was not happening to people like them. They were able to watch this show without fear because Dahmer would have never victimized them. People are constantly watching the horrors that Black people face completely unphased because it is not happening to them, so they are not getting retraumatized by it the way that Black people are. “‘Dahmer”’ isn’t the only problem, there are at least 134 podcasts on Apple Music, Spotify and Soundcloud about true crime in the US. The entertainment aspect that people associate with murder causes desensitization of brutality in a way that absolutely can be avoided. 

A lot of people justify making media about real serial killers by saying that it (1) raises awareness and (2) allows us to understand the mind of a killer. I, however, justify the extent to which an average American needs to do either of those things. It is not the role of the citizen to understand the way killers think, that is what we have psychologists and detectives for. Further, there is not any education happening when people are only learning about the victims in relation to Dahmer and only 2% of people who watched the show actually researched the victims. 

Lastly, it is important to acknowledge the effects the show had on the victims of the families. The mother of one of Dahmer’s victims has spoken out against the series saying that “it didn’t happen that way.” Despite the outcry from the families of victims, the directors and writers of the show felt no need to consult families because these cases are public records. Rita Isbell, a sister of one of the victims has made a true claim about how the show is using murder as a way of making money, claiming “It’s sad that they’re just making money off of this tragedy.” I imagine creators in Hollywood sitting in a room watching the news thinking about how much money each story is going to make them. The profit outcomes that come from horrific events change the way people view such events. 

Dahmer is no longer alive, but he has been immortalized through the 21+ pieces of media created about him. This is exactly what he wanted, and by making movies, books and shows we are displaying his name and making it so that everyone knows his name. We should stop giving terrible people the power and attention that they killed for.

Tags

dahmerjeffrey dahmernetflixreviewserial killer

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleThe Sound of Solidarity in Hozier’s Latest Single “Swan Upon Leda”
Next articleOur Choices for the Top Five Horror Movies of 2022

You may also like

Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy

Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand

Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top