• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
      Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
    • It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
      It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
    • What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
      What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • No image
      Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy
    • No image
      Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand
    • Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
      Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
      Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
    • Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
      Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
    • The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
      The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Saanthia Bulchandani OpinionsMay 2, 2018

Trump supporters fear loss of white supremacy not economic security

Photo Courtesy of Sean Rayford

Last week, Diana C. Mutz, a political science professor at the University of Pennsylvania, published a study that characterizes Trump supporters as inherently racist and disinclined to diversity, which is not surprising to most. Much of Trump’s symbolic significance lies in his promise to restore power and status to white American males, purposefully discriminating against any group that diverges from this category.

The study revealed that Trump supporters, contrary to what some conservatives would have us believe, did not vote for Trump to ensure a sense of economic stability, but rather to re-establish the dominance of “whiteness.” This study incorporates analyses from previous years, particularly an analysis published in The Washington Post that explained “First, white millennial Trump voters were likely to believe in something we call ‘white vulnerability’ — the perception that whites, through no fault of their own, are losing ground to other groups. Second, racial resentment was the primary driver of white vulnerability — even when accounting for income, education level or employment.”

Mutz explained the lack of evidence regarding the correlation between Trump supporters and economic anxieties in that the economy faced significant improvement before the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Furthermore, she discovered that people did not perceive their financial standings as a reason to vote for Trump. Instead, she describes the symbolism of “racial resentment” as the driving motivation for Trump supporters. “It’s not a threat to their own economic well-being; it’s a threat to their group’s dominance in our country over all,” she explained.

Although Mutz’s study provides more of a reason for people to criticize the Trump Administration and its latent racism, it does not offer any new information regarding the profile of Trump supporters. Similar studies on Trump supporters have been published habitually. A Public Religion Research Institute survey conducted last year with a sample group of 3,000 people found that cultural displacement is a primary reason for inclination towards Trump. This means that white Trump supporters did in fact support Trump out of a fear of being disadvantaged.

A feature of particular significance in Mutz’s study is a psychological measure called “social dominance orientation,” which quantifies the extent to which a person believes that hierarchy is inextricable from the construct of a society. She found a strong correlation between higher social dominance orientation and Trump supporters, revealing the sizeable perceived threat that white American males were concerned about when they voted for Trump. Furthermore, an article published in The Independent on Saturday, April 28, contained a poll that asked whether one would like to see a female president in their lifetimes; 60 percent of Trump supporters clicked no. Diversity and inclusion simply do not fit into Trump supporters vision for America.

In the midst of these new polls, one might question their purpose. Does it really matter whether the driving forces behind one’s vote is economic or cultural? Or is this focus a digression from a larger problem: the fact that white voters used somewhat empty economic concerns as a cover for supporting Trump’s racist ideals?

As an international student studying at Wellesley, the distinction between economic and cultural motives worry me. My naïve idealism compels me to believe that voting for Trump is a culmination of economic fears. However, the little voice inside my head is profoundly aware of the only reason a significant proportion of the United States, a country revered for its mélange of cultures, would vote for a man who is a symbol of white male supremacy. It disheartens me to think of the backward society that Trump supporters hope for, one that they are trying to achieve by establishing their superiority and dominance through  electing a man who promises to eradicate and eliminate any “cultural threats” — a vague concept that could encompass anything he decides.

When I think of a Trump supporter, I see a white man, holding a sign that says “Make America Great Again.” I worry about what this “greatness” is based upon, that it marginalizes minorities and places travel bans on entire nationalities and culture groups. I worry that Trump is perhaps the most powerful person in the world, let alone the United States and that one of his first major policy decision was to ban citizens of six Muslim countries from traveling to America. I worry about what I will do once I graduate, since finding a job in the United States as an international student is becoming virtually impossible. More than anything, I wonder what pleasure Trump supporters have gained in their attempts to eliminate diversity.

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleWhy students should rally behind the Global Flora Project
Next articleWe need to support the ambitions of working mothers

You may also like

Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification

It’s time to put traditional grading to the test

Banner reading this website has been seized over images of a book shelf

What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top