• About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
The Wellesley News -
  • News and Features
    • Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
      Professor Phillip Levine Discusses “A Problem of Fit”
    • CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
      CS Department shifts CS 111 course structure
    • WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
      WAMI and WRJ host discussion on criminalization of abortion
    • News
      • News in Brief
      • Nation & World
      • President’s Corner
      • Senate Report
    • Features
      • Alumnae Spotlight
      • Eye on Science
      • Faculty Focus
      • LGBTQIA+ Column
  • Opinions
    • Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
      Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification
    • It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
      It’s time to put traditional grading to the test
    • What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
      What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?
    • Staff Editorial
    • Letters to the Editor
    • The Elephant in the Room
  • Arts
    • No image
      Pentimento’s Open Mic is Like an Old Patchwork Quilt–Worn, Yet Cozy
    • No image
      Kanye’s Antisemitism Steps on his Shoe Brand
    • Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
      Lousy Realities: Luca Guadagnino (2015)
    • Arts In The News
    • Reviews
    • Music Peek
    • Books Before Boys
  • Sports and Wellness
    • Student-Athlete of October
      Student-Athlete of October
    • Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
      Athletics Update Oct. 19, 2022
    • The Case for Body Neutrality
      The Case for Body Neutrality
    • Athlete of the Week
    • Boston Sports Update
    • The Vegan Digest
    • The SHE Corner
  • The Wellesley Snooze
    • Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
      Top 10 Girlbosses who aren’t alumnae, but I would totally believe you if you told me they were
    • Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
      Wendy Wellesley’s Thanksgiving Menu
    • The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
      The Snooze Awards for the Best Tanners of 2022
  • Miscellanea
    • President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
      President’s Column: The Butterfly Effect
    • Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
      Administrators shocked to learn that students dislike being left in dark
    • 50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
      50 Lies You Tell Yourself in Order to Survive Until Graduation
    • The Dose
    • The Olive Branch
    • Multimedia
      • Galleries
      • Infographics
      • Videos
By Cheynie Singleton OpinionsDecember 7, 2022

Why towns affected by gun violence are split on candidates

Photo of a protest in favor of stricter gun control
Protest in favor of stricter gun control. Image courtesy of Unsplash

On May 24, 2022, a gunman opened fire at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, and killed 19 students and two teachers. This tragedy and the dismissal response of law enforcement horrified the country and renewed conversations surrounding gun violence. As I watched Uvalde vote this midterm election, their stance on gun laws was nothing short of surprising, especially when compared to communities like Broward County in Florida where similar tragedies have occurred. Just four years earlier on Feb.14, 2018, 14 students and three teachers were killed in Parkland, a municipality in northern Broward County, when a former student opened fire at Marjory Stoneman-Douglas High School. Both of these towns have seen the worst of what gun violence can do to a community, but as we all know, they are far from the only communities in America to experience something so horrific. 

This year’s midterm results in Uvalde and Broward were especially revealing because they reflected the country’s division over addressing gun violence. In the November 2022 Texas gubernatorial election, Uvalde County overwhelmingly voted in favor of Republican candidate Greg Abbott. Not only is Abbott vehemently against all forms of gun control, but he also expanded access to firearms by legalizing permitless carry. Meanwhile, voters in Broward were strongly in favor of gubernatorial candidate Charlie Crist, a Democrat who has been vocal about his support for stricter gun laws (it’s important to note that incumbent Ron Desantis ultimately defeated Crist at the state-wide level). 

Like many Americans, I was shocked when the numbers in Uvalde came back in favor of Abbott. It would make sense that citizens in Uvalde would vote for a candidate like Beto O’Rourke after the tragedy they witnessed this past Spring. Why didn’t Uvalde vote for the “gun sense” candidate like Broward did? Perhaps Uvalde citizens didn’t prioritize gun violence over other issues like abortion and the state economy. 

It’s easy to say that the tragedy at Robb Elementary wasn’t enough to change the direction of the electorate in Uvalde, but I don’t believe that this is the case. While conducting research for this article, I found it much harder to find voting resources for Uvalde than for Broward. Broward provides concrete information about municipal elections and precinct access, as well as information about redistricting and election day procedures. 

Uvalde on the other hand doesn’t even provide updated numbers on voter registration. The accessibility of election information appears to make a difference in voter turnout given that a higher percentage of registered voters vote on election day in Broward than in Uvalde. The fact that it was so hard to find election information for Uvalde compared to Broward proved to me that political leaders want to make voting as hard as possible for Uvalde citizens.

At first glance, comparing Broward to Uvalde seems fair. But when you look deeper, it’s clear that they can’t be held to the same standards because of the role of race in these societies. Broward is over 60% white and Uvalde is nearly 80% Hispanic/Latino – Uvalde’s elected officials do not represent the racial makeup of the county. This has created what Uvalde natives describe as a racial hierarchy. 

After the incident in May, former Uvalde resident Neil Meyer wrote about this dynamic in the Washington Post. Meyer stated that the white minority in Uvalde places its love of right-wing ideologies over the safety and needs of the Hispanic community. He wrote that Robb Elementary – which is 90% Hispanic and 81% economically disadvantaged – has been at the center of “the struggle in Uvalde over the past half-century to desegregate its schools,” and that he knew the victims would be largely Hispanic when the news broke about where the shooting took place. The majority of Uvalde is Hispanic/Latino, and the majority of Hispanic/Latino citizens generally feel that Democrats care about them more than Republicans. Based on this, Uvalde should be voting in favor of Democrats like Beto O’Rourke and subsequently voting for gun-sense candidates. But Uvalde’s leaders wish to maintain the racial hierarchy because it allows them to stay in power. So they limit access to voting information and resources in order to make voting harder for citizens. Ultimately, this has led to Uvalde voting in favor of Republicans and against gun-sense. 

Broward has homogeneity in its population and its elected officials, and this saves the town from having the same problem that Uvalde has. There isn’t a racial hierarchy between the government and citizens like there is in Uvalde. And the interest of Broward’s white majority is not a threat to its predominately white leadership. As a result, voting in Broward is generally easier than it is in Uvalde because voting information and resources are made accessible by people in power. Voter participation and turnout are naturally increased when barriers to voting are eliminated, and higher voter turnout tends to tip key races in the direction of Democrats and gun-sense candidates.

Broward County and Uvalde County are not split on this issue because one city cares more about the tragedy it faced. Citizens in both towns clearly care about what happened in their communities. They are split on the issue because they don’t share the same challenges. The only thing these communities have in common is that they both were scenes of mass gun violence. Other than that commonality, Broward and Uvalde are different in every other way so we should expect the results of their elections to reflect that difference. Until the racial hierarchy in Uvalde subsides, access to voting information will remain challenging and Uvalde will continue to not vote in favor of gun-sense candidates. 

Share on

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Google +
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Previous articleA tale of two Wellesley’s divided by wealth
Next articleWhat can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?

You may also like

Why Art Basel is partially responsible for Miami’s gentrification

It’s time to put traditional grading to the test

Banner reading this website has been seized over images of a book shelf

What can the fall of Z-library teach us about textbook accessibility?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

Top Articles

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @Wellesley_News

The independent student newspaper of Wellesley College since 1901.

Sign up to receive our weekly digest in your inbox

* indicates required

  • About
  • Editorial Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Advertise
  • Join Us
  • Archives
COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE WELLESLEY NEWS
Back to top